...DID we go to the moon?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Of course not. There is footage of the astronauts in the space station in obvious weightlessness for periods longer that can be faked in a diving aircraft.
Hold-on. Your saying there are real people in the space station?
I heard it was all CGI (Computer generated imagery). Of course, we are not talking here about your usual run of the mill computer, but, the secret ones at NASA or was it Area 51?
Hmmm... FF resurrects a five year old thread so it can be active during the fiftieth anniversary year of the moon landing. Oxygen.
 
Last edited:
Hold-on. Your saying there are real people in the space station?
I know! He's so gullible. Here's proof that the ISS is fake, by almost Nobel prizewinner and successful author J.P. Skinner:

http://www.marsanomalyresearch.com/evidence-reports/2010/184/fake-starfield.htm

And here's more on The Conspiracy:

https://wiki.tfes.org/The_Conspiracy

Remember, there is no Flat Earth Conspiracy. Everyone can see it is flat with their own eyes. It is a Space Travel Conspiracy!
 
The guy who did that is a paid sophist.

No he isn't. Prove it, but without resorting to another moronic conspiracy.

Look how he tried to obfuscate the clear proof that the Chinese spacewalk was faked.
http://debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com/2011/07/chinese-spacewalks-part-1.html

Seems spot on. You got your ass kicked yet again.

The clearest anomaly is item seven on his list. He tried to obfuscate this.

I truly think that anyone who thinks they are filming the space walk in water is a complete moron. There are numerous reasons why a flag would do any number of things in a vacuum, but in water, it simply does not flap so effortlessly. You cannot possibly believe that is in water.

Your nemesis kicks your ass here as well:


The flag fluttered the way it would in a gaseous or liquid medium at the thirty second time mark in this video. This is such a clear anomaly that the moderator over at Political Forum deleted the posts where he addressed this because it's simply too clear to obfuscate and he just looked silly.

You are a liar. You keep making this claim that you are being censored, when what us happening is your off topic spam is getting removed. The flag moves exactly the way it would in a vacuum. You have zero credibility, your attempt at hijacking this thread with such obvious drivel is pathetic.

Here's more.

Spam.

I started posting here again because I wanted to continue this discussion.

You started posting here because you have some serious OCD issues and a complete inability to see how crazy your claims are.
 
I'm just trying to thwart censorship. It's not easy to share this info as it gets deleted on so many forums and comment sections of articles.

You are an appalling spammer who has not one ounce of credibility. You have demonstrated an appalling dishonesty on this thread and everywhere you post.

When Neil Armstrong "Passed away"* there were articles in Yahoo and other places that had comment sections at the bottom of the articles. All of the comments were celebratory and the links to the hoax proof I tried to post didn't appear.

Pathetic spammer complaining about his span being removed.

I can't even post them in Wikipedia.

Because they have all been debunked. Nobody cares whether YOU think they haven't - they have and you are a busted dead hand.

This debate isn't even allowed on most forums anymore. With all of this censorship it's pretty difficult to get the info out so I post it wherever I can.

Get A Life. Forums have had enough of this bullshit. Some have sections for the loonies, but most don't tolerate them.

If there weren't any censorship, I wouldn't feel the urge to thwart it somehow.

You don't "thwart" anything. You are one of the biggest jokes on the internet. I'm sure you have this need for notoriety even if it's as the biggest failure online.

I used to put links to the info in YouTube comment sections but I'm shadowbanned** there now.

Did you now! That second video details over a thousand in a matter of a few weeks.

Get A Life.

If the moon landings were real, why is the hoax info blocked in so many places?

Who cares, it isn't "info" it's bullshit.

If a theory is wrong, it will fall by its own lack of merit.

The big problem is not that your spammed crap has fallen a thousand times, it is that you refuse to accept it. It fell on its own dis-merit 10 years plus ago.

Censorship is only necessary when a lie is being defended.

You're not being censored, nobody is. There is no lie being defended, there are some forums that won't put up with YOUR lies!

Medical Doctors Killed Neil Armstrong!

Oh shutup!


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning–Kruger_effect
 
No but it's proof that the guy who put this together...
http://debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com/

...doesn't even believe his own arguments.

An utterly ridiculous statement. Let's dissect it.

YOU make the ridiculous claim that the Chinese are in a swimming pool and not in space, because of some moronic and highly selective observations, then the man who routinely kicks your sorry ass, kicks your sorry ass over this and because YOU disagree with him, he must therefore be a paid sophist and doesn't believe his own argument?

Where is your proof he doesn't believe this totally obvious debunk of your nonsensical claim and where is your proof that this makes him a paid sophist. EVEN IF you had made a sound solid argument(and I've yet to see that from you!!) it would still only mean he was wrong. Do you ever wonder why most people think you a bit on the sad side?

 
All of you pro-Apollo people seem to be maintaining that the flag movement in the video in post #153...
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/did-we-go-to-the-moon.134682/page-8#post-3568738

...is consistent with its being in a vacuum. This pretty much destroys your credibility and all of the viewers have seen it. You can't save this with attitudes and snide remarks. That anomaly is simply too clear to obfuscate. There's a point at which things are so clear that sophistry simply becomes ineffective. That anomaly is in that category.
 
This pretty much destroys your credibility.....

This is the guy that believes bubbles are jagged, rotating, quickly enlarging and that flags swivel in water. This is the guy who thinks Macca was replaced:rolleyes: I do not wish to clutter this thread with all the mad batshit nonsense you suck up.

There's a point at which things are so clear that sophistry simply becomes ineffective. That anomaly is in that category.

You are the internet equivalent of a blocked toilet. Full of it, un-flushable and it just keeps overflowing.
 
No matter how lame your arguments are, you people have the attitude that you have the upper hand. The truth is that it's pretty clear that you don't even believe your own arguments.

You'll never admit anything though.

http://www.whale.to/m/disin.html
http://www.whale.to/b/sweeney.html
(excerpt)
-----------------------------------------------
6) Artificial Emotions. An odd kind of 'artificial' emotionalism and an unusually thick skin -- an ability to persevere and persist even in the face of overwhelming criticism and unacceptance. This likely stems from intelligence community training that, no matter how condemning the evidence, deny everything, and never become emotionally involved or reactive. The net result for a disinfo artist is that emotions can seem artificial. Most people, if responding in anger, for instance, will express their animosity throughout their rebuttal. Butdisinfo types usually have trouble maintaining the 'image' and are hot and cold with respect topretended emotions and their usually more calm or unemotional communications style. It's justa job, and they often seem unable to 'act their role in character' as well in a communicationsmedium as they might be able in a real face-to-face conversation/confrontation. You might have outright rage and indignation one moment, ho-hum the next, and more anger later -- an emotional yo-yo. With respect to being thick-skinned, no amount of criticism will deter them from doing their job, and they will generally continue their old disinfo patterns without any adjustments to criticisms of how obvious it is that they play that game -- where a more rational individual who truly cares what others think might seek to improve their communications style,substance, and so forth, or simply give up.
-----------------------------------------------

You're about as impressive as the black Knight in this video.

Monty Python - The Black Knight - Tis But A Scratch
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmInkxbvlCs
 
No matter how lame your arguments are, you people have the attitude that you have the upper hand. The truth is that it's pretty clear that you don't even believe your own arguments.
Honestly, the only reason I read your posts is for amusement. You are someone I can point to when other people say "come on, no one is THAT stupid."
 
No matter how lame your arguments are, you people have the attitude that you have the upper hand. The truth is that it's pretty clear that you don't even believe your own arguments.

"lack of faith in god" ?
huh ?

is the attitude the belief ?
or
is the argument the lack of god ?

you cant use faith as a reasoning tool to prove lack of scientific fact when you do not provide any scientific fact to begin with.

its like saying "don't believe in the invisible chair when your sitting on the floor"

subjectivity debates around faith in history is called religious philosophy
 
Last edited:
FatFreddy:

The guy who did that is a paid sophist. Look how he tried to obfuscate the clear proof that the Chinese spacewalk was faked.
If you're going to make accusations that somebody is being paid to spread disinformation, then you really ought to present some evidence to support your accusation. Failing that, it's at best your opinion and at worst it makes you look like a paranoiac.

Given the persistency with which you apparently spam your anti-moon landing propaganda around the internet, it would seem equally possible that you're being paid, or possibly you think there is some kind of non-monetary personal advantage that is to be gained from your continuing efforts.

Notice, however, that nobody is trying to dismiss your arguments on the basis that you're paid, or even that you're biased (as you clearly are). Rather, your arguments have been addressed on their merits, such as they are.

I'd say your work here is probably done, since you apparently have nothing new to present on this forum that you haven't already posted to twenty other forums. You seem more interested in carrying on some kind of personal battle than in actually debating the topic any more.

What do you think?
 
There used to be a good video on YouTube by a guy whose YouTube channel name was Stevethechemist. He had a video in which he showed that the guy making the jump in this video was on a wire.

John Young's Lunar Salute on Apollo 16


He compared the falling soil with the falling sand in volleyball games on the beach. You can put YouTube videos in slow-motion by clicking on the six-sided star that's on the lower right-hand corner of the videos.

Start watching this video in slow-motion at the 5:44 time mark.

TOP 40 Crazy Actions Beach Volleyball | FIVB Beach Volleyball World Champs 2017


When the guy on the right in the foreground jumps, the sand goes up as high as his foot does. When the Apollo astronaut jumps, the soil he kicks up starts falling before the astronaut starts coming back down. That can be explained by the astronaut's being helped by a support wire. Can anyone else offer another explanation?
 
There used to be a good video on YouTube by a guy whose YouTube channel name was Stevethechemist. He had a video in which he showed that the guy making the jump in this video was on a wire.

John Young's Lunar Salute on Apollo 16


He compared the falling soil with the falling sand in volleyball games on the beach. You can put YouTube videos in slow-motion by clicking on the six-sided star that's on the lower right-hand corner of the videos.

Start watching this video in slow-motion at the 5:44 time mark.

TOP 40 Crazy Actions Beach Volleyball | FIVB Beach Volleyball World Champs 2017


When the guy on the right in the foreground jumps, the sand goes up as high as his foot does. When the Apollo astronaut jumps, the soil he kicks up starts falling before the astronaut starts coming back down. That can be explained by the astronaut's being helped by a support wire. Can anyone else offer another explanation?
Yeah, your grasp of dynamics is weak.
 
Yep i believe they went, before my time but i think so. I think the human race is far more advanced than they tell us.

What i think they hid was the fact that secret technology got them there, and thats what nasa was hiding. Thats why they cannot explain the questions, as the technology was far more advanced than they told the public.

The people have every right to ask questions, but they have it the wrong way round, mankind went but had better techs then they told you guys. Thats what they are hiding, i.e that mankind is far more advanced than they tell us.

I even think russia and usa, and europe probably work together behind the scenes at some level, that is totally hidden to the public, while we watch this nasa show, and world going on. I think you will find russia and usa worked together on some levels during the cold war, even though at our level there was alot going on.

But what nasa really is hiding, is that humans are far more advanced than the stuff they told the public, and this is why nasa cannot explain the questions about it.

Nasa was just some publicity stunt to steal countless amounts of money to launder into other projects during cold war.

How does anyone know thinking they where working on the moon project that they may of been working on something else? Everything is compartmentalised, so no one on the inside knows anything more than they are required to know to do there job.

All nato countries are run from underground bases, and the masses have no idea.

I think neil armstrong never spoke about it, as he was pissed of that when he arrived at the moon, humans where already there, and it was all just a show. Thats why he never spoke, and was probably just told to go off and not talk about it, and keep quiet, while his name was made famous for a publicity stunt. When infact humans are far more advanced then they are telling anyone.
Sorry you so confused
Seriously get a grip on reality

:)
 
...DID we go to the moon?

I don't know about you, but I certainly did not.

By the way I don't believe china exists. It is pretty clear that there are a bunch of americans that had squinty eye surgery and are just speaking gibberish, to trick us. Have you ever noticed that every single chinese resturant has the exact same menu - coincidence, I think not!

OMG never noticed that about same menus

So with China gone and according to Flat Earthers Australia does not exist

We really messed up reality

:)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top