...DID we go to the moon?

[billvon]

Strange they have not been seen in same room together

That sand is SO fake! Everyone knows that if you put sand near the ocean, it dissolves like sugar. They must have trucked synthetic moon dust in just to make you think that Schwartzenegger was on a beach. WAKE UP SHEEPLE!

 

[Michael 345]

That sand is SO fake! Everyone knows that if you put sand near the ocean, it dissolves like sugar. They must have trucked synthetic moon dust in just to make you think that Schwartzenegger was on a beach. WAKE UP SHEEPLE!

I suspected something like that but unsure

Thanks for putting me straight

Take that FF

 

[David C]

Here's a post where I talked about the flag anomaly* with Betamax.

That is one of about 30 different spam exchanges you made on that same forum.

Betamax destroyed his credibility (again) by saying that the movement of the Apollo flag cannot be duplicated on earth by trotting by it even though anyone who tries it can see it can be duplicated on earth.

You have no credibility to judge others credibility. You make this "trotting by the flag claim" then fail miserably to back it up with video. I trotted by a flag and saw nothing until I was level with it. There is also a video made by this betamax101 person that shows something wafting past fabric and it is nothing like what you claim. Your sad excuse is that it is not horizontal, yet you yourself made the claim of a cloth hanging from a light. Besides, if you rotate the scenario by 90 degrees it is the same thing:

Betamax also agrees with Jay Windley's analysis of the dust-free sand issue.

Only the stupid and uneducated disagree with Windley.

He aslo maintains that the Chinese spacewalk** was real.

He proved your bubble claim was a small chunk of ice and the idea of a free rotating fabric in water is so colossally stupid it is beyond belief that you can claim it.

You can pretend all you want.

Pretend what?

Your success rate at trying to make the viewers think the Apollo missions were real is probably close to zero.

What viewers? Prove your success rate is not in minus figures?

 

[James R]

Here's a post where I talked about the flag anomaly* with Betamax.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-moon-landing-is-fake.553296/

Betamax destroyed his credibility (again) by saying that the movement of the Apollo flag cannot be duplicated on earth by trotting by it even though anyone who tries it can see it can be duplicated on earth.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-apollo-15-flag.438617/page-2#post-1065710796


Betamax also agrees with Jay Windley's analysis of the dust-free sand issue.
http://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=1118.15

He aslo maintains that the Chinese spacewalk** was real.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/the-moon-landing-is-fake.553296/page-4


You can pretend all you want. Your success rate at trying to make the viewers think the Apollo missions were real is probably close to zero.



*
http://forum.cosmoquest.org/showthr...pollo-footage-was-filmed-in-air-here-on-earth

**
http://forum.cosmoquest.org/showthread.php?169361-The-Chinese-spacewalk-was-faked-in-a-water-tank

Okay, so looking at what you have posted here, this is all links to discussions that are done and dusted on other forums.

Recall that I said back in post #191 that if you had nothing original to offer here, but simply want to bring your baggage from other forums, then I would close your threads.

It looks like we're at that point.

Thread closed.

If you want to discuss anything new, we'll still be here.