...DID we go to the moon?

Status
Not open for further replies.
We didn't go to the Moon six times. People didn't continuously observer the ships (via relays) on any of those trips. The radio signals weren't triangulated from widely separated facilities on Earth. NASA invented a way to simulate the time lag of radio signals and conversations really just APPEARED to be lagging due to that darn speed of light limitation.

Sorry, but it would have been easier to actually go.
 
FatFreddy said:
When the guy on the right in the foreground jumps, the sand goes up as high as his foot does. When the Apollo astronaut jumps, the soil he kicks up starts falling before the astronaut starts coming back down. That can be explained by the astronaut's being helped by a support wire. Can anyone else offer another explanation?
Click to expand...
Of course. His feet launched his own mass strongly but did not impart as much velocity to the regolith, since it was under his foot - so it didn't rise at the same speed. Lower initial speed = lower maximum height = faster beginning of descent. Middle school physics.

Now, there is a way to get dust to go higher than your foot. If you smash your foot down, the air beneath your foot gets compressed and shoots out in all directions (including up) - and this can carry dust higher. But you need air to do that, which they didn't have.

Congratulations, FF! You have just proven that they were in an airless environment.
 
Last edited:
Gawdzilla Sama said:
We didn't go to the Moon six times. People didn't continuously observer the ships (via relays) on any of those trips. The radio signals weren't triangulated from widely separated facilities on Earth. NASA invented a way to simulate the time lag of radio signals and conversations really just APPEARED to be lagging due to that darn speed of light limitation.

Sorry, but it would have been easier to actually go.
Click to expand...
It's a scam that grows with the telling.
 
FatFreddy said:
When the guy on the right in the foreground jumps, the sand goes up as high as his foot does. When the Apollo astronaut jumps, the soil he kicks up starts falling before the astronaut starts coming back down. That can be explained by the astronaut's being helped by a support wire. Can anyone else offer another explanation?
Click to expand...

the vollyball video is a fake made to make money for bookies who are faking the internet.
its all fake
the bookies had to fake the vollyball game sand to make sure no one lost a bet on the fake moon landings for their huge ponzy scheme,
ponzy was quite impressed, but she is still trying to get the stains out of the carpet.
next year they will do it outside to avoid getting moon dust in their cracks.

damn newton & his big practical joke making up the laws of gravity.
he is such a joker !
is anyone else sick of pretending that gravity is real ?
who faked gravity ?
 
Last edited:
candy said:
Are you telling me that I forced myself to stay awake until the wee hours to watch man take his first step on the moon and it was just a movie?
Click to expand...
If they were trying to fool people, they would have gotten a bigger audience in prime time.
 
David C said:
FF is spamming this on other forums.
Click to expand...
It appears that Fat Freddy has no new content to offer. Most of the substantive material he posts appears to be copied from provious posts he has made to other forums.

In the circumstances, I think that if he has nothing new to offer here, this thread and others on his moon landing conspiracy should be closed. There's little point in rehashing already-debunked material.

Members are invited to report any instances of Fat Freddy reposting previously-debunked material here, following this post. If he does that again, I will close his threads.

Fat Freddy: please take note! Thankyou!
 
candy said:
Are you telling me that I forced myself to stay awake until the wee hours to watch man take his first step on the moon and it was just a movie?
I want my money back.
Click to expand...

thankfully you are not asking for your moon back because that would be a hard landing
punyouverymuch
 
James R said:
It appears that Fat Freddy has no new content to offer. Most of the substantive material he posts appears to be copied from provious posts he has made to other forums.

In the circumstances, I think that if he has nothing new to offer here, this thread and others on his moon landing conspiracy should be closed. There's little point in rehashing already-debunked material.

Members are invited to report any instances of Fat Freddy reposting previously-debunked material here, following this post. If he does that again, I will close his threads.

Fat Freddy: please take note! Thankyou!
Click to expand...

It isn't just restricted to the Moon landings. He seems to scatter his claims everywhere for his barmy 200mpg car, his 911 crushing evidence, his holocaust denial and loads of small stuff. I can just picture his day: "Oooh look what I found, I'm going to post it on as many forums as I can, that will show them."
 
it creates a semi entropic illogical narrative that allows psychological manipulation
it panders to cult programming and people with psychiatric disorders where entire processes of cause and effect logical science are missing.
it never goes deep because that uncovers the science
it pretends to go deep by repeating the same superficial things over and over then jumping to unrelated science facts to use cult religion brain washing logic.

junk food for adults whom are institutionalized-religious-indoctrinated children
 
delusional-goon.gif


https://ibb.co/kgZsPhH

LMAO at the delusion. No amount of reasoning works with this bloke.
 
Last edited:
David C said:
delusional-goon.gif


LMAO at the delusion. No amount of reasoning works with this bloke.
Click to expand...

so he is claiming that some "shill" is using his profile ?
so he can claim no accountability for some posts which ever dont run the right way with the tide of crazy ?
and he is claiming victimised refugee status from sciforums ... ?

that's a bit thick(absurdly arrogantly outlandish)
 
James R said:
Members are invited to report any instances of Fat Freddy reposting previously-debunked material here, following this post. If he does that again, I will close his threads.
Click to expand...
Well that pretty much means no more fat freddy posts, since he has presented anything new in years. Hooray!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top