very astute. you just now noticing this?
Yes just today.
He seemed alright, but this guy is a full scale loon.
very astute. you just now noticing this?
anybody that would bitch and moan about someone using 'thier' avatar without permission is shallow indeed.imaplanck. said:Yes just today.
He seemed alright, but this guy is a full scale loon.
spidergoat said:What do you think is the best strategy for dealing with extremely difficult people?
"Enjoy the difficulty.
Then the more difficult they are, the more you'll enjoy it."
-Ron
A threat would have been defintely phrased as "if you .... then our ways must part", or something similar.
As it happens I had merely put a question, in some considerable difficulty to comprehend your philosophy, what it should take for you to deign to afford a genuine respect.
On one thread you purport to castigate abuse and then on another you appear to prefer to side with an abuser, according at least to the moderator's opinion.
You would thus appear to me to be an idiot unfortunately short of integrity, comprehension, reason and intelligence, afflicted by some sort of emotional undertow that you have yet perhaps to account to yourself for, let alone to anybody else.
You remind me of my father, who was similarly keen to bully and belittle at the slightest opportunity, while possibly making sense to himself but scarcely to whoever he picked on, nor to bemused onlookers.
In his case it was mostly about being out of his depth, conditioned to exceed his capabilities to a foolish extent.
Given the choice, I would rather that you did.
Vexation is vexation.
I had the intention several times to ask him to remove that avatar, but by then knowing his tendency to react intensely, and considering that there were much bigger problems at hand than using a photo without permission or using a real name in open forums, I refrained from asking so.
Wait. This battle is not worth fighting, not for me.
I noted that ron ceased posting with regard to water ages ago
I was warned for merely replying to a post:
invert_nexus said:..... So. In trying to comprehend my 'philosophy' you put forth a question on whether you should cut my throat or not?
This would somehow clear up the question of my 'philosophy' how?
invert_nexus said:Hell, I'd have more respect for you if you'd actually threatened to cut my throat rather than taken the coward's way out by coaching it in terms of the question like you did.
invert_nexus said:I'm an enigma wrapped in a mystery shrouded in darkness.
Anyway.
What do you mean? Sided with an abuser? You mean Spurious in this thread?
Actually, I never took sides as to the copyright issue. I happen to believe that you were right in that.
invert_nexus said:How can you copyright Dennis Hopper's photo? He's a celebrity?
Anyway.
God. You're a whiny little cunt. Is your name trademarked too? Are you a brand name?
What if he changes it? Say.... makes it so a monkey is humping your head? Will that satisfy you?
invert_nexus said:.... But, leave it to you to raise a big stink about it.
Your present reply appears to have done so:
You'd glory perhaps in supposing that you were worth it, as you seem to do already, but which of course you are not.
This did not exactly strike me as being unequivocal support:
Big stink?
You are the one, yet again, with the big long post to tell us how terribly unimportant it is.
I made one posting which should have sufficed as my stink, beyond which I did nothing but respond to the stink that you and the rest chose to create.
Hypocrite, pot ... kettle ... black, you are as much to blame, if anybody is.
invert_nexus said:...I mean. The only way you could ever have found that out is by threatening to kill me.
Right?
I am not threatening to kill you.
That's for sure.invert_nexus said:Plus. I really think you're way too much of a pussy to do anything more violent than beating your wife.
invert_nexus said:However.
You did threaten to kill me.
invert_nexus said:Yes.
You did.
Now shutup.