# Change ONE Letter

Licks.

Slicks

Sticks.

ticks

Tricks

I think this is endless..

that's why you should all try to make the words longer..more challenging..

Bricks

that's why you should all try to make the words longer..more challenging..

You're right.

Let's change it to chaning TWO letters (any two, together or not).
Add two, remove two, change two, add one and remove one...

BUT...

You have to show a clear connection between the two words.
Lingusitic connection or otherwise. Be creative.

That shoud be a bit more challenging, no?
What do you guys think?

You're right.

Let's change it to chaning TWO letters (any two, together or not).
Add two, remove two, change two, add one and remove one...

BUT...

You have to show a clear connection between the two words.
Lingusitic connection or otherwise. Be creative.

That shoud be a bit more challenging, no?
What do you guys think?
Maybe a bit too difficult, the connection thing, but we can try.

What's the connection?
And you changed three letters! :spank:

What's the connection?
And you changed three letters! :spank:

It has to be connected...??

I changed two letters: bRIcket ----> bUcketS (all the other fours stay the same)

It has to be connected...??
Yep, see post 128

I changed two letters: bRIcket ----> bUcketS (all the other fours stay the same)
1. You replaced the 'R' with an 'U'
2. You removed the 'I'
3. You added the 'S'

:blbl:

Yep, see post 128

If they have to be connected, it will be too difficult. So, why don't we remove that rule? ^__^

1. You replaced the 'R' with an 'U'
2. You removed the 'I'
3. You added the 'S'

:blbl:

I thought I did exactly per rule:

You're right.

Let's change it to chaning TWO letters (any two, together or not).
Add two, remove two, change two, add one and remove one...

I removed R and I, and added U and S :shrug:

Anyway, if it has to be like what you mean, we can cancel the "buckets". So, the last word is "bricket". I'll see if I can come up with one before the other post new one. Ok?

If they have to be connected, it will be too difficult. So, why don't we remove that rule? ^__^
It was just installed (post 128).

I thought I did exactly per rule:

I removed R and I, and added U and S :shrug:
No, the former rules were that you can add one latter, remove one letter, or change on letter.
The new rules are that you can [add OR remove OR replace] a letter and then do it again (post 128).

Edit:
According to your understanding of the new rules you made three changes as well.
You removed 'RI', added 'U', and added 'S'

It was just installed (post 128).

No, the former rules were that you can add one latter, remove one letter, or change on letter.
The new rules are that you can (add OR remove OR replace) a letter and then do it again (post 128).

Did you see my post #136?

Also, I am still confused with the "connection" thingy. Can you give me one example?

Did you see my post #136?

Also, I am still confused with the "connection" thingy. Can you give me one example?

I did, but I couldn't help myself

I think that rule is too difficult as well, but I think we should just try.
Example: See post 130.

Ok, I see what you mean by connection. So it's like the "word association" games, right...?

BUT, I still don't understand the rule.. my mind is slow today

For example, what does he/you mean by:

Add two, remove two, change two, add one and remove one...

Can you give an example for that? I didn't understand your example before:

bricks ---> bricket

isn't that changing just one (the 's')? T__T

Maybe I should just stay out of this game