that's why you should all try to make the words longer..more challenging..
Maybe a bit too difficult, the connection thing, but we can try.You're right.
Let's change it to chaning TWO letters (any two, together or not).
Add two, remove two, change two, add one and remove one...
BUT...
You have to show a clear connection between the two words.
Lingusitic connection or otherwise. Be creative.
That shoud be a bit more challenging, no?
What do you guys think?
Bricks
Bricket
What's the connection?
And you changed three letters! :spank:
![]()
Yep, see post 128It has to be connected...??
1. You replaced the 'R' with an 'U'I changed two letters: bRIcket ----> bUcketS (all the other fours stay the same)![]()
Yep, see post 128![]()
1. You replaced the 'R' with an 'U'
2. You removed the 'I'
3. You added the 'S'
:blbl:
You're right.
Let's change it to chaning TWO letters (any two, together or not).
Add two, remove two, change two, add one and remove one...
It was just installed (post 128).If they have to be connected, it will be too difficult. So, why don't we remove that rule? ^__^
No, the former rules were that you can add one latter, remove one letter, or change on letter.I thought I did exactly per rule:
I removed R and I, and added U and S :shrug:
It was just installed (post 128).
No, the former rules were that you can add one latter, remove one letter, or change on letter.
The new rules are that you can (add OR remove OR replace) a letter and then do it again (post 128).
![]()
Did you see my post #136?
Also, I am still confused with the "connection" thingy. Can you give me one example?![]()
Add two, remove two, change two, add one and remove one...