Discussion: Auschwitz Holocaust Claims Are Unsubstantiated

Status
Not open for further replies.
James has locked the thread because he doesn't want to debate. He made a claim the gassings where state sanctioned and now he's to cowardly to stand by that point. He has looked for every reason not to debate. I'm the one who has had to compromise several time to lower the criteria. I've also been banned several times for ridiculous reasons, although people here have been allowed to insult and indirectly make physical threats to me. Jame didn't even leave the debate open for someone else to challenge. What a fucking coward.

Yes I'm finished with Sci-forums. I'm enjoying the sun reading the millennium edition of Hitler's War. Wow! Primary sources, not historical incest and cannibalization! I used to not really give a shit about WW2, thanks for making me wonder why people are so emotional about the bullshit claims of the Holocaust. Several Jews agree with me also. So fuck off everyone. I'll waste no more time with you here.

Sci-Forums notifications are now spam so I don't know this places exists now.
 
Yeah, you have to wonder why people are so emotional about a great deal of their ancestors getting starved, gassed, and burned. Get a clue!
 
steampunk, James has locked some other thread because you were not engaging in fair debate.

On June 17, in post #106, James R accepted your proposed topic from post #98.

This has been fairly represented in the brand-new, strictly moderated formal debate thread which awaits your opening statement : http://sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=114212

The standard rules apply with an extension of posting time that you did not object to when it was spelled out in post #97.

If I had the least doubt about the state-sanctioned murder of blameless civilians under the Nazis, I would suggest that you read those rules and write your post. Otherwise you look like someone who is all hat and no cattle.

BTW, Rule 9 provides "Other than as provided in Rule 8, debaters may not post in the Discussion thread until after the conclusion of the Debate." so until you actually live up to the obligations you requested be put on yourself in post #1 of the proposal thread, you should not be posting here.
 
Last edited:
The thread isn't locked.
Why not debate the point, steampunk?

The Jewish population in Europe dropped massively and inordinately wherever Hitler gained power.
I don't doubt personally that that was done by murder on an industrial scale.
Perhaps you think that the reduction of the Jewish population had a different cause.

If you have some new reliable information, please tell us.
 
spidergoat said:
Yeah, you have to wonder why people are so emotional about a great deal of their ancestors getting starved, gassed, and burned. Get a clue!
Click to expand...

and that just restricted to the mass killings of the camps no including the beatings, shootings, bombings, and straffing runs against civilians by german military units.
 
As well as the fate of most people that died in the "death zone"of Eastern Europe, from simple (but deliberate) starvation and disease.
 
steampunk said:
James has locked the thread because he doesn't want to debate. He made a claim the gassings where state sanctioned and now he's to cowardly to stand by that point. He has looked for every reason not to debate. I'm the one who has had to compromise several time to lower the criteria. I've also been banned several times for ridiculous reasons, although people here have been allowed to insult and indirectly make physical threats to me. Jame didn't even leave the debate open for someone else to challenge. What a fucking coward.

Yes I'm finished with Sci-forums. I'm enjoying the sun reading the millennium edition of Hitler's War. Wow! Primary sources, not historical incest and cannibalization! I used to not really give a shit about WW2, thanks for making me wonder why people are so emotional about the bullshit claims of the Holocaust. Several Jews agree with me also. So fuck off everyone. I'll waste no more time with you here.

Sci-Forums notifications are now spam so I don't know this places exists now.
Click to expand...

James R: Do you see what we mean about this guy? He has no other purpose here but to goad and offend. Good riddance to him. Perhaps we can all go back to discussing scientific concepts now rather than Neo-Nazi agenda.
 
steampunk:

steampunk said:
James has locked the thread because he doesn't want to debate. He made a claim the gassings where state sanctioned and now he's to cowardly to stand by that point.
Click to expand...

Don't tell lies, please.

The debate thread is waiting for you here:

[thread]114212[/thread]

He has looked for every reason not to debate. I'm the one who has had to compromise several time to lower the criteria.
Click to expand...

As the Proposal thread shows, I made a number of compromises.

I've also been banned several times for ridiculous reasons, although people here have been allowed to insult and indirectly make physical threats to me.
Click to expand...

You have been banned twice. Once for insulting other members, and once from dishonest trolling. And neither of those bans where handed out by me.

If you have been physically threatened, please hit the "report" button on the relevant posts and the person concerned will be immediately banned. I have seen no such reports from you or anybody else.

Jame didn't even leave the debate open for someone else to challenge. What a fucking coward.
Click to expand...

The debate is open, waiting for you. It has been open since the thread was created. It has never been closed at any time.

Yes I'm finished with Sci-forums.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I thought you'd probably wimp out rather than try to support your claims in a real debate.

So fuck off everyone. I'll waste no more time with you here.
Click to expand...

Thanks for making our lives easier, steampunk!

There's no need to debate you because you have put no arguments. We don't need to ban you because you're leaving voluntarily. Problem solved!

Have a nice life, steampunk. I hope you grow up one day.
 
Now he can start up his own blog, and join Oil Is Mastery in condemning SciForums:
(from Oily's blog)

Censorship Forums

SciForums.Com (Banned)
TheScienceForum.Com (Banned)
Historum.Com (Banned)
ExplainedDogma.Com (Banned)
RichardDawkins.Net (Banned)
BAUTForum.Com (Banned)
TheFossilForum.Com (Banned)
PhysicsForums.Com (Banned)
ILovePhysics.Com (Banned)
ChemicalForums.Com (Banned)
Chemicool.Com (Banned)
PeakOil.Com (Banned)
http://oilismastery.blogspot.com/
 
Cowboy up and face James...and when he's done handing you your ass....I'll hand you the other butt cheek with the 9/11 debate.

Don't be a big pussy...follow through with you challenges.

giant-kitty.jpg


http://sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=114212

James has drawn his sword...time for you to pull out what you got.
 
Last edited:
James R said:
The debate is open, waiting for you. It has been open since the thread was created. It has never been closed at any time.
Click to expand...
No doubt he thought that pandering gross historical-revisionism here at SciForums would be a relatively simple exercise. As is quite obvious he badly underestimated the staff, membership, and dynamics of this board.

Kudos to the SF staff for unequivocally stepping up to the plate and dealing - quite fairly - with the challenges presented by historical-revisionism. Kudos to the membership for embracing the truism that aspects of history... are every bit as important as physics theorems and mathematical equations.
 
I avoided most everything posted by him. Guess that was a good thing?..
 
Can we close this thread now, so I can go on with my vacation?
 
Maybe time to just end the thread?

The last near twenty posts don't seem to have anything to do with the topic.... Though they may be in line with its original intent, to cause conflict.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top