Is gravity caused by rotation rate?

DaveC426913 said:
Sorry about that. Going back through the thread, I see Einsteinian gravity was first referenced in post 17 by billvon, and it continued from there.

This is confusing river. Can we move forward (if we need to) using the simple Newtonian "gravity is a force" model, please. (for masses where m2 << m1)

F = m/r^2.


We are still waiting for River to produce any rationale at all that supports his fanciful idea that rotation rate has anything to do with gravity - and idea that is easily falsified by any quick glance at the data.

I expect he will not have any defense, and - if he replies at all - will simply continue to repeat his assertion without any rationale - at which point we can consider this thread 'asked and answered'.
Click to expand...
Возможно, он заметил, что магнитное поле зависит от скорости вращения.
 
river:
river said:
[Gravity] Is caused by rotation . Alone . The rate of rotation is what it is .
Click to expand...
river said:
Depends on their mass , density And volume . The a amount of space the mass takes up .
Click to expand...
So which is it? Gravity is due to rotation alone, or gravity is due to rotation and mass, density, volume and maybe a whole bunch of other things too?

It sounds like you don't actually know.

Why are you making claims about what causes gravity, when you don't have the foggiest clue of what causes it?

Shouldn't you be asking questions or, you know, reading something to try to learn?
 
James R said:
river:


So which is it? Gravity is due to rotation alone, or gravity is due to rotation and mass, density, volume and maybe a whole bunch of other things too?

It sounds like you don't actually know.

Why are you making claims about what causes gravity, when you don't have the foggiest clue of what causes it?

Shouldn't you be asking questions or, you know, reading something to try to learn?
Click to expand...
If I still Earth so that it no longer rotates , then the only source of gravity is mass . Which is not enough to hold our atmosphere in place . That is my point about gravity . Gravity is not just about mass . It is also about rotation .
 
billvon said:
Both are warped by gravity - at least, here in reality.

GPS satellites prove this every single day.
Click to expand...
How is space warped ? What actually warps space ? What the process ?
GPS proves rotation . Those satellites adjust their orbit constantly .
 
river said:
If I still Earth so that it no longer rotates , then the only source of gravity is mass . Which is not enough to hold our atmosphere in place
Click to expand...
Why do you think this? What experiments have you done?

river said:
. That is my point about gravity . Gravity is not just about mass . It is also about rotation .
Click to expand...
Why do you think this? What experiments have you done?

If what you say were true, why does the data say it is false?

The data shows a direct correlation between mass and gravity, and no correlation between rotation rate and gravity. Can you explain that?

Where is your data that might back up your claim? Do you have any? Or are you talking through your hat?
 
ольга said:
Пин, если у вас время разное у каждого объекта, значит, время у вас неоднородно. Верно ли поняла вас?
Click to expand...
Yes that is almost right. There is no such thing as a Universal time. We synchronize our watches. Then If you move fast or are in a gravitational field, then time will get distorted when comparing your clock to mine when we meet up.
 
river said:
That's the camera lens warping this space . Not space its self .
Click to expand...
Yeah right, the most sophisticated and accurate space and ground based telescopes ever designed and built are distorting the image?
Because you have the first clue about any of this?

Just keep posting, I'll keep reporting you for being a trolling idiot.
 
Can we please get off the topic of warped space. See thread title.

River is wrong even in Newtonian space.
 
Pinball1970 said:
Yeah right, the most sophisticated and accurate space and ground based telescopes ever designed and built are distorting the image?
Because you have the first clue about any of this?

Just keep posting, I'll keep reporting you for being a trolling idiot.
Click to expand...
Because they are focused on that object . In the bigger picture , zoom out , way out , there is no warping of space .
 
(Q) said:
... and there is no gravity, the earth is flat and pixie dust comes out my ass when I fart.

What's it like to be an idiot who denies facts?
Click to expand...
Earth is not flat . Rivers in the northern hemisphere can run both in north and south directions . At the same time . Flat Earth is a dud theory .
 
river said:
But its not . Space its self can not be bent . With images it just seems so .
Click to expand...
Wrong. Not all the objects are lensed in the images just the ones that have a suitably massive body Infront.
Just look at the images, why do you need this spelling out?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top