UFOs (UAPs): Explanations?

If you have no idea what it is then you can't rule out mundane.
Click to expand...

Sure I can. An object that has no jet flare or wings and that accelerates suddenly to supersonic speeds and stops on a dime and changes direction instantly is no mundane object. There is nothing that can fly like that in the mundane world.
 
Magical Realist said:
Sure I can. An object that has no jet flare or wings and that accelerates suddenly to supersonic speeds and stops on a dime and changes direction instantly is no mundane object. There is nothing that can fly like that in the mundane world.
Click to expand...
That you know of. Now you've demonstrated that you know fucking everything, but in the real world, where the rest of us live, that's not the case.
 
Gawdzilla Sama said:
Do you know EVERYTHING that exists in the mundane world and can you recognize EVERYTHING in the mundane world when you see it?
Click to expand...

Yes I can. That's the benefit of a 21st century education. If it is not known yet, then it isn't a part of the mundane world. It's by definition extramundane.
 
Last edited:
Magical Realist said:
No comment was made on all the bullshit explanations out there because they're bullshit.
Click to expand...
Doesn't sound like a very thorough report. Got a link?

They assume multiple errors and pilot blunders that only make the Navy look bad.
Click to expand...
If it makes the Navy look bad, then it didn't happen?

Got a lot of confidence in your armed forces reporting things accurately and fairly, have you?

Such was not the case, as proven by corroborating evidence on multiple systems.
Click to expand...
Is that in the official report? Got a link?

That's the new name for these mysterious objects now, not mistaken jets seen from the rear or whales or flocks of seagulls.:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
What does the "U" stand for in UAP?
 
Magical Realist said:
"U" as in NOT a meteorite, the planet Venus, a jet seen from the rear, swampgas, a weather balloon, a whale, or a flock of seagulls.
Click to expand...
No? So not unidentified after all, but partially identified? They know definitely what it was not, but not what it was?

Is all this in the report? Got a link?
 
Magical Realist said:
Sure I can. An object that has no jet flare or wings and that accelerates suddenly to supersonic speeds and stops on a dime and changes direction instantly is no mundane object. There is nothing that can fly like that in the mundane world.
Click to expand...
The thing on the IR video sure looks like jet flare. The wings, not being hot, wouldn't necessarily be visible on IR.

As for the alleged accelerations and speeds, all of that is questionable.

Magical Realist said:
I know what exists in the mundane world. Don't you?
Click to expand...
No. The world is a big, complicated place.

Also, previously you have suggested that some UFOs might be top secret aircraft or the like. I think you'll agree those would be "mundane", or is a top secret aircraft a paranormal phenomenon by your definition?

You're also assuming that you can instantly recognise all mundane phenomena for what they are, no matter the quality and availability of evidence. You can't do that, so why pretend you can?
 
James R said:
Doesn't sound like a very thorough report. Got a link?
Click to expand...

Thorough reports don't report on the bullshit accounts.


If it makes the Navy look bad, then it didn't happen?

Got a lot of confidence in your armed forces reporting things accurately and fairly, have you?
Click to expand...

Yes I do.


Is that in the official report? Got a link?
Click to expand...

Look it up.


What does the "U" stand for in UAP?
Click to expand...

Unidentified. As in an unidentified aerial phenomenon.
 
Also, previously you have suggested that some UFOs might be top secret aircraft or the like. I think you'll agree those would be "mundane", or is a top secret aircraft a paranormal phenomenon by your definition?
Click to expand...

You're confusing me with Yazata. I have never suggested some UFOs might be top secret aircraft.
 
No? So not unidentified after all, but partially identified? They know definitely what it was not, but not what it was?
Click to expand...

Unidentified as in not identifiable as anything known at all. That's the standard definition of a ufo I've posted here about 20 times already:

"The USAF defines a UFO as: Anything that relates to any airborne object which by performance, aerodynamic characteristics, or unusual features does not conform to any presently known aircraft or missile type, or which cannot be identified as a familiar object."(USAF Regulation 200-2)
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top