LMAO. And I'm talking about group averages. You know this but you're brainwashed and projecting strawmen.
Do all races have the same genetic IQ potential?
- Thread starter Felicity Isherwood
- Start date
- Status
LMAO. And I'm talking about group averages. You know this but you're brainwashed and projecting strawmen.
That's your most intelligent post yet.
You demonstrate black genius with some guy who mashed up some peanuts. Please tell me you're joking?
I didn't say anything about genius. We were talking about potential. Tell the peanut industry that George Washington Carver was a nobody.
spidergoat
Valued Senior Member
The idea of political equality has nothing to do with whether people are actually equal in all qualities. Marxism, which I'm not defending, and which you are misusing to mean "enemy", is the idea of equal economic justice through central organization of the means of production.
Racial equality in potential intellectual ability cannot be isolated from the larger cultural context. In fact, you are using the larger cultural context as an example of ability, when it is more a measure of majority domination of minorities through terrorism and inaccessibility to political power. Historically, this also included unequal access to modern weapons, unequal resistance to disease, and unequal resources.
Genetically, there is more variation between individuals than between the (mostly culturally defined) categories of the races.
Racial equality in potential intellectual ability cannot be isolated from the larger cultural context. In fact, you are using the larger cultural context as an example of ability, when it is more a measure of majority domination of minorities through terrorism and inaccessibility to political power. Historically, this also included unequal access to modern weapons, unequal resistance to disease, and unequal resources.
Genetically, there is more variation between individuals than between the (mostly culturally defined) categories of the races.
I love how you people always trot out this random fact about junk DNA as if it has any relevance to trait distributions. It's a normal variation ratio among subspecies.
Anybody heard the name B. F. Skinner?
spidergoat
Valued Senior Member
I'm talking DNA variation in a general sense, not junk DNA, which I'm not sure is even a legitimate concept. And in general, the more variation there is in a population, the stronger it is in terms of adaptation. For example, thoroughbred horses may be great at running, but their inbreeding results in health issues, and they would never survive well in the wild compared to the aboriginal types you so despise. The same is true for people. Inbred pasty white motherfuckers would do well to get some mixed DNA in their blood if they want to remain healthy as a population in the long term, particularly with respect to skin cancer, living in regions away from their northern latitude "homelands".
Mod Hat — Closure and redirect
We should remember that some arguments are not easily established or defended within the realm of rational discourse. While it remains a question what manner of fool would genuinely think revisiting disgraced theses for the sake of clueless provocation is any sort of good idea, there are some issues well enough left to await a proper argument toward their advancement. Blithering, clueless hatred is a manner of self-denigration that really ought to be reserved to dancing with oneself, or perhaps undertaking particular session work; as a communal or societal proposition, though, it's generally best to spare everyone else the bother.
Closed, filed to Cesspool.
We should remember that some arguments are not easily established or defended within the realm of rational discourse. While it remains a question what manner of fool would genuinely think revisiting disgraced theses for the sake of clueless provocation is any sort of good idea, there are some issues well enough left to await a proper argument toward their advancement. Blithering, clueless hatred is a manner of self-denigration that really ought to be reserved to dancing with oneself, or perhaps undertaking particular session work; as a communal or societal proposition, though, it's generally best to spare everyone else the bother.
Closed, filed to Cesspool.
- Status