DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
Guys. Arguing with this guy serves his purpose. He's getting free publicity.
Just now IggiedGuys. Arguing with this guy serves his purpose. He's getting free publicity.
They get that anyway.Guys. Arguing with this guy serves his purpose. He's getting free publicity.
Meanwhile: No human race has been defined by shared ancestry, or any other scientific classification method.
Darwin said:Grant all races of man descended from one race; grant that all structure of each race of man were perfectly known—grant that a perfect table of descent of each race was perfectly known.— grant all this, & then do you not think that most would prefer as the best classification, a genealogical one, even if it did occasionally put one race not quite so near to another, as it would have stood, if allocated by structure alone. Generally, we may safely presume, that the resemblance of races & their pedigrees would go together.
The purpose of their repetition is wearing down the opposition - they're not arguing, they're repeating, and the purpose is to occupy the rhetorical field, use up the bandwidth, outshout. Take advantage of the free platforms, all of them, over and over and over.
'which time era do you use to create your median IQ value to DNA ?
You can quote Plato, for all the good it will do you.Wrong again. I can quote Kant and Blumenbach if you want too.
Not as delusional as someone who puts quote marks around their ranting terms, as if someone else had posted them. Those voices you're hearing? - they're yours, not mine."Race doesn't exist", "IQ doesn't exist", any differences are caused by imaginary "environmental variables" that are never identified. You're fucking delusional.
DNFTT?You can quote Plato, for all the good it will do you.
What you can't do is cite a valid scientific study or paper that subdivides the species Homo sapiens into races based on "shared ancestry".
Not as delusional as someone who puts quote marks around their ranting terms, as if someone else had posted them. Those voices you're hearing? - they're yours, not mine.

Cool, so "Humans" is a race. Got it. Subdivisions are just nods to social b/s, right?Shared ancestry, like any other taxa in biology.
So talk about his ideas and ignore him.Guys. Arguing with this guy serves his purpose. He's getting free publicity.
I suppose you have evidence to support that? Aboriginal babies raised in the Japanese culture show lower IQs? Are you judging "performance" entirely on the basis of arbitrary IQ tests?Meanwhile, in reality, races perform similarly wherever they're transplanted, strongly implicating genetic differences.
I wasn't aware that Marx invented equality.I guess this is a Marxist forum, rather than a science forum.
I'm white and I've always been a minority in my homeland. The Ku Klux Klan tried to keep my ancestors out of Canada because they didn't speak English. They were German."White supremacist" is anti-white cultural-Marxist meme for patriotic whites that don't want to become a minority in their homelands. It's a lie, a lie from anti-white scum.
That would be overall equality. A black person is just as valuable overall as a white person. You're trying to single out one trait to justify unequal treatment....the delusional that people are "equal"...
A black person is just as valuable overall as a white person.
Valuable overall. You can't decide a priori what "potential" somebody might have.Valuable for what?
Is it?Your answer to everything is "equality"...
Feel free to give equality the slightest inspection. Demonstrate it falling apart. Give examples. Be specific.... and it all falls apart at the slightest inspection,
You can't decide a priori what "potential" somebody might have.
Every person has unknown potential. By your warped ideals, there would be no educated black people - no George Washington Carver, no Martin Luther King, no Barack Obama - because they had no potential. It seems clear that you are the delusional one.That's what you're doing. Every race has "equal" potential, based on nothing.