There is other footage in which an astronaut is standing close to a flag and there is no attraction or repelling. It only happens in this footage at a point where the movement is perfectly consistent with the atmosphere explanation.
There is no other footage where he runs close enough to the flag. The clue was in the words "build up". It happens when the charge reaches a critical discharge point.
If this were the case, there would be no clear flag movement. Are you saying the flag is not really moving?
After he hits it with his elbow yes, before it's perfectly feasible that the tiny movement is a camera bloom.
Explain why the lens flares move.
As I said before, there is no visible movement of the pole or rod which makes the flag move. If it were ground vibration making the flag move, there would be visible movement of the pole and rod.
I am not concerned with what you said before a million times. The vertical rod moves and can easily be verified.
There would be points where the pebbles and rocks would make little depressions in the flag where they impacted it. There are none. The flag moves in a way that's consistent with a wall of air hitting it.
The regolith simply strikes the lower part of the pole. Not the flag!
The flag doesn't move up and down. It moves from left to right. If your scenario were the case, there would be some visible up-and-down movement.
It doesn't need to be more than a few millimetres on the Moon. You would not notice it on that camera and quality. It is perfectly feasible.
Also, look at the rest of the flag info.
What info?
This flag anomaly closes the whole case. The footage was taken in a studio.
It does not close any case and your conclusion is ludicrous. The footage in most cases encompasses vast evenly lit terrain, that would need a hangar the size of a few miles!!
The guy who did that has said some very lame things that destroyed his credibility. He agreed with Jay Windley's* lame analysis of the dust-free sand issue.
Spare us your pathetic ad hominem and address the arguments given. I would remind you that giving your bare asserted opinion as a means to dismiss other opinion is kind of moronic. Especially when the replies from those people tear your backside out!
He maintains that the Chinese spacewalk was real.
Only morons think the Chinese faked their spacewalk.
He knows the moon missions were faked as well as the hoax-believers do.
Only morons think the Apollo missions were hoaxed. Neither of those two people give
any reason to suggest they believe that idiotic claim.
