We never went to the moon.

Discussion in 'Conspiracies' started by Ryndanangnysen, Mar 4, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    14,165
    His analysis was spot-on. They weren't driving on sand.

    BTW I loved your response when your claims were shown to be false:

    "I can't do those kinds of calculations."

    Perhaps if you learned math the world would make more sense.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    496
    Well, your credibility is shot.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. billvon Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    14,165
    Having you think my credibility is shot is like Roy Moore thinking that I am not good with children. I can definitely live with that.
     
    origin likes this.
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. David C The print that nails this troofer Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    252
    I figured you would be so incredibly stupid that you wouldn't even realise it was raised 20 pages ago and already answered!!

    You are such a very dishonest person you fail to answer large numbers of posts, including the one on the previous page.

    How come the lens flares move? My AVATAR from the other forum makes your stupid sand claim completely moot. But you are too deceitful to acknowledge this.
     
  8. David C The print that nails this troofer Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    252
    To mathematics add -

    Geology, basic photography, basic physics, entry level critical thinking skills. For one who argues for this and many other batshit crazy theories, he's none too smart in anything related to them!
     
  9. Beer w/Straw Transcendental Ignorance! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,090
    • Members are asked to avoid homophobic comments.
    He could be like a Scientologist wanting to spread the word.

    Aside, Tom Cruise is a fudge packer.
     
  10. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,806
    What's the matter, "disinformation agent" out of vogue?
     
  11. Xelasnave.1947 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,900
    How disappointing Freddy you have not put up something to discuss.
    Alex
     
  12. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,211
    Are you referring to clavius.org?

    I don't quite get the context, but this seems like it might be a pun on "The Well-Tempered Clavier" - a well-known collection of Bach pieces for piano.
     
  13. Beer w/Straw Transcendental Ignorance! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,090
    I was thinking South Park BTW



    And Tom Cruise despises psychology over Scientology and I'm guessing he lost custody of his children to Nicole because he is such an idiot. I'm not even going to look for a reference.

    I should apologize for nothing.
     
    Last edited: Dec 22, 2017
  14. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    496
    Well, there don't seem to be any objective truth-seekers here. Any seventh-grade science student could tell you that just transporting and placing large-grained dust-free sand would not cause enough erosion to create enough dust to cause a dust cloud when the sand is driven over and that it would take a team of guys with sledgehammers beating the sand for several days to create that much dust.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/index...-ever-happened.512081/page-29#post-1068254989

    Jay Windley* should have given this a little more thought when he was trying to think of a way to obfuscate this. His saying that was a pretty big blunder. He should have thought of a better story.

    Nobody here has simply said that he was wrong so nobody here has any credibility. There's a point at which things are so clear that sophistry simply becomes ineffective. The best sophist in the world couldn't convince a ten-year-old that a picture of a zebra is really a picture of a giraffe. The anomaly in question here is about that clear to the viewers who take the time to click on the links and examine the issue. You can't save this one with rhetoric and snide remarks; it's simply too clear.


    *
    http://clavius.org/about.html
     
  15. Beer w/Straw Transcendental Ignorance! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,090
    Did you report my post for homophobic bigotry?

    Forgive me for not staying on topic for this thread...
     
  16. FatFreddy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    496
    As I said before, you can't save this with snide remarks.

    If it means anything, I'm straight. I'm not a homophobe but I don't like the idea of gays adopting kids.
     
  17. Beer w/Straw Transcendental Ignorance! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,090
    So, you didn't report my post?
     
  18. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,211
    I did.
     
  19. Beer w/Straw Transcendental Ignorance! Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,090
    Well, I'd appreciate if you'd ask me something instead of just reporting me.
     
  20. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,806
    Basing your judgmental judgement on what, specifically?
     
  21. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,211
    No. What you wrote was offensive and unnecessary. If your intent was otherwise, the obligation is on you to ensure you define the context. And it's really up to the mods to warn.
     
  22. DaveC426913 Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,211
    Still off-topic, but it did allow FF to reveal this common hypocrisy:
    Yup. He's a homophobe.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  23. Gawdzilla Sama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,806
    People are giving more "forever homes" to dogs than human orphans, but what some people do in the privacy of their bedroom disqualifies them?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page