So what color is the sky in your world?....here it's blue.
So what color is the sky in your world?....here it's blue.
What evidence? You don't have any evidence. You're ignoring evidence. I have overwhelmingly significant evidence, such as responsible reports of massive explosions at the Twin Towers and WTC 7....you're still ignoring evidence.
Sorry. Ed Ward, MD, is not a credible expert on the chemistry of nanothermite.
Ed Ward's dispute is with the editors of Wikipedia’s article on nanothermite, not me. As I have said before, that article, in part, states:Have you read the whole article and all the links? Please read them before you make a judgement.
http://www.rense.com/general77/geddno.htm
You're just playing makebelieve like Read-Only. That buffoon thinks that he's an expert on everything but he obviously has difficulty just reading. Just tell me what makes you and MacGyver1968 think that you're experts in structural engineering? Also, if you think that you're defending the official government conspiracy theory, then you better shut up. You're not supposed to communicate a clear understanding of why WTC 7 collapsed because that would "jeopardize public safety."Weaken the steel and cause it to collapse after the fire burned long enough to heat the steel. And - what do you know? - the WTC's collapsed after the fire burned long enough to weaken the steel.
A pattern is beginning to emerge. All the deniers have embraced the pretense of having an advanced understanding of structural engineering and chemistry. I see the debate as being a clash between independent professional architects, structural engineers, chemists, physicists, and demolition experts versus pawns of government power. And when the contrast is made between John Gross, the Lead Engineer of the NIST Report, and the Firemen and First Responders that were actually present at the Twin Towers and WTC Building 7 on 9/11, the actual truth becomes apparent. There is a contradiction which is easily resolved. It's obvious that John Gross is lying and all the Firemen are telling the truth.Have you read the whole article and all the links? Please read them before you make a judgement.
http://www.rense.com/general77/geddno.htm
Explain why my opinion about nanothermite is more important than what the editors of the Wikipedia article on nanothermite have assembled. If you think that Ed Ward, MD, has any relevant information on nanothermite, then why aren't you trying to add it to Wikipedia's article? Being an editor to Wikipedia is just as easy as signing up for this forum. Add that information over there, then I'll read it.So, you refuse to read it?
I do have experience being an editor on Wikipedia and I've made a few contributions. It's as easy as I said it was. Although you'll find that most editors are squatters, i.e., they're satisfied with existing articles as they already are and will revert all modifications you make to the way the article appeared before. But then you can fight it out with them on the discussion pages.When you say that posting on wikipedia is easy, is that an unfounded opinion, or have you got experience of posting articles on the website?
it's obvious to me that the government is increasingly expressing worry about more and more people doubting the government's version of the conspiracy theory. The 9/11 Truth Movement is increasing strength. I signed the ae911truth.org petition this morning. So this false-flag operation has failed.You don't see how all these variables could foul a plan in advance?
As I said, the fires were a cover for the demolition by explosives.Didn't you say the fires weren't that intense to cause a collapse? So which was it?
Just tell me what makes you and MacGyver1968 think that you're experts in structural engineering?
Also, if you think that you're defending the official government conspiracy theory, then you better shut up.
You're not supposed to communicate a clear understanding of why WTC 7 collapsed because that would "jeopardize public safety."
An engineer in what field?I'm not an expert; just an engineer.
But wait; that means you actually passed exams covering problems in structural engineering. At a minimum that makes you a qualified expert, far better equipped to comment accurately on the science involved than just about anybody posting here. And even if there happened to be person here better informed than you, it wouldn't matter, since all of the subject matter here is technically far too shallow to make any difference. By that standard you are indeed an expert best qualified to characterize the evidence on both sides of the argument.I'm not an expert; just an engineer.
It's almost always religiosity or superstition of some kind that drives the antagonism against expert opinions such as yours.I clearly don't have your understanding of Satan though so I guess I will defer to you in that department.
It would be the reader's loss if you did. Especially good are your clear and correct posts on all kinds of science topics - certainly in matters of mechanical engineering, and esp. as it applies here. Of course to some people, the movement to wipe out illiteracy through education amounts a conspiracy -- at least that's how their defense mechanism want to characterize it.I'm not defending anyone's conspiracy theory - and I won't shut up.
That's a new one on me although it's the predictable answer of last resort for religiosos. When we get to the bottom of what they're feeling so defensive about, then all the real skeletons will come out of the closet. No doubt it's a deep state of denial so there's a lot of gnashing of teeth and rending of garments until they exorcise their demons.But keep posting; I am very entertained by the latest "Satan did it" theory of yours.
It's mainly engineers and other professionals that have desks, usually accompanied by a piles of technical material unless they've finally gone paperless. The antagonists are probably operating from their kitchen table, limited to a passing knowledge of pop fiction and sci-fi as their ultimate reference library.Sorry, I am going to anyway. If you feel you are being put at risk by that, by all means, hide beneath your desk.
An engineer in what field?
Thanks Bill...I'm totally in league with Lucifer....I'm sacrificing a goat to him tonight for New Years. Who want's bbq'ed shank?....and no...I'm not a structural engineer...but I am an engineer than can smell bullshit from a mile away.![]()