There IS No New World Order

Discussion in 'Conspiracies' started by Eugene Shubert, Dec 7, 2013.

  1. Eugene Shubert Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,067
    It reveals that your fantasy has been debunked. And by you jumping instantly to yet another fantasy is a confession that your previous fantasy is without substance.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Eugene Shubert Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,067
    Why haven't you seen the side-by-side video comparisons of the demolition of WTC7 with other acknowledged demolitions? I'll tell you why. "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance." --Albert Einstein.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Eugene Shubert Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,067
    How do you know? Why have you chosen to not listen to eyewitness accounts of a shockwave ripping through WTC7?

    [video=youtube;lESol88wOi0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lESol88wOi0[/video]
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. Eugene Shubert Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,067
  8. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,703
    There is no further research.
    The obviously logical verdict was handed down long ago.
    It's only a few nutty conspiracy pushers that infest forums such as this, pushing their own agenda.
     
  9. Eugene Shubert Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,067
    Other Fires in Steel-Structure Buildings is obviously relevant. You really do need to think for yourself and to question your unthinking obsession to follow the herd.
     
  10. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,703
    No it isn't. The verdict has been given. Live with it.
    Oh, and far far better to follow the herd rather than some poor paranoid conspiracy nutter.
     
  11. Eugene Shubert Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,067
    It's relevant to individuals that think for themselves. That angers you? Live with it.
     
  12. Read-Only Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,296
    It doesn't "anger" me BUT I find *you* highly annoying. Why don't you just back out of here and stop cluttering up the thread?
     
  13. paddoboy Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    21,703
    Like I said, the verdict has been given. Live with it. Or continue with your inane efforts for attention.
     
  14. Eugene Shubert Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,067
    Intelligence angers willful ignorance. This thread is about my thesis. A thesis is meant for discussion and debate. Persons here that are incapable of contributing intelligent thinking are the ones that are cluttering up this thread.
     
  15. Read-Only Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,296
    Let me make this very plain for you: Your efforts are wasted here - you have NOT succeeded in changing a SINGLE person's mind about 9/11 and you never will. So the choice is yours - keepon wasting your efforts and your life itself here or go somewhere where people have weaker minds.
     
  16. Eugene Shubert Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,067
    You have already revealed that you have no mind of your own. So shouldn't I be going to the person that thinks for you?
     
  17. Read-Only Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    10,296
    No one thinks for me. I'm a retired researcher and quite well off - I do my own thinking and also do as I please.

    Following this post, you will become the first one on my ignore list. And I expect several others will also do the same. Your audience is shrinking swiftly since you've nothing of value to say. I hope you enjoy your isolation...
     
  18. Eugene Shubert Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,067
    Wow! Read-Only was caught pretending that he's an expert on everything and he's still playing that game.
     
  19. Eugene Shubert Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,067
    I'm delighted that the obviously senile senior citizen who asserts that the firemen and first-responders that were actual eyewitnesses on 9/11 had better shut up about hearing explosions and blindly trust their government will not be attempting to derail this thread any longer with his ignorant whining.
     
  20. Eugene Shubert Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,067
    You're certain that a building with a tin roof qualifies as a modern building but perhaps professional architects mean a structure with a modern (meaning sophisticated) level of modern design safety. And you're certain that the bricks in your photo were scattered by fire and not by an explosive force? How did you arrive at that conclusion?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    You heard Professor Dr. Niels Harrit say that no steel-framed high-rise has ever collapsed due to fire and that there have been super-fires in over 300 steel-framed high-rises and that none of their steel structures were affected by their super-fires. This audacious claim requires a credible refutation and a straightforward counterexample.

    According to NIST, Final Report, xxxi, in reference to the WTC, “This was the first known instance of the total collapse of a tall building primarily due to fires.”

    So don't ignore these undeniably true and essential facts for a true understanding of 9/11: Other Fires in Steel-Structure Buildings.
     

Share This Page