But you're not. Tough. If you don't like it, go spew your garbage somewhere else.
You should have a blog, where you could maintain your delusion that you're brilliant without having the rest of the world contradict you.
Reality is...
- Thread starter Spellbound
- Start date
You should have a blog, where you could maintain your delusion that you're brilliant without having the rest of the world contradict you.
I actually have an education and knowledge unlike you.
You haven't the slightest idea.
Not true.
Nope, most science sites would just ban you and be done with it.
You have no insights into reality. Your posts show a profound lack of any insights.
Lol! Pathetic. Talk about bias.
The CTMU in a nutshell, By Albert Fils-Aime:
Processors in SCSPL facilitate, maintain, define, describe, explain, stabilize, design, produce, use, and enable their spatial aspects, which are interpretative, objective, and topological compositionally. The metalogical axioms of SCSPL represent three essential ingredients of an ultimate form of tautology called supertautology, which enable one to deduce reality's composition. They are closure, comprehensiveness, and consistency.
Closure states that ...the universe possesses closed syntactic boundaries under the observation that explanatory gaps existent within the definitional confines of reality would induce a lack of informational coherence, disabling informational distinctability, causing the instability of perception. It says that reality is self-contained for lack of an external identity upon which to base itself.
The medium is this ultimate syntax on which perceptual stability is based. And comprehensiveness states that the universe is stable perceptually regardless of decidability. This has the effect of ensuring that anything cognitively or perceptually recognizable as part of reality is not excluded for want of syntax. In other words, that which is confined by reality syntax is consistently applied via syntactic distribution to its correspondent domain.
That is, states consistently represent their subjectivizations. Absolute subjective law enables consistent and coherent universal expansion of syntactic operators injected in the medium and the medium itself as a syntactic operator. By reference to perceptual reality, its consistency is thus affirmed by the recurrent operations of syntax and state, maintaining syntactic and semantic levels of consistency.
As a combination, the principle of consistency ensures that these levels of consistency exist so as to ensure total self-containment in the course of defining reality as an entity which serves as its own source, means and reason of existence. As a closed syntactic identity generalistically equating to its universe of reference, syntactic discontinuities exist at the local level, requiring reality to further embed itself as the ultimate syntactic identity, in which case telesis is bound as a telic augmentation, the form of which intelligence possesses appearance but is not otherwise.
Together with each of the above principles, we may deduce reality's composition as such, but with further (limited) compliance to what is already the scientific standard for physical law. Semantically speaking, this is as valid a theory of reality can be in accordance to the already evolved, current scientific paradigm.
Processors in SCSPL facilitate, maintain, define, describe, explain, stabilize, design, produce, use, and enable their spatial aspects, which are interpretative, objective, and topological compositionally. The metalogical axioms of SCSPL represent three essential ingredients of an ultimate form of tautology called supertautology, which enable one to deduce reality's composition. They are closure, comprehensiveness, and consistency.
Closure states that ...the universe possesses closed syntactic boundaries under the observation that explanatory gaps existent within the definitional confines of reality would induce a lack of informational coherence, disabling informational distinctability, causing the instability of perception. It says that reality is self-contained for lack of an external identity upon which to base itself.
The medium is this ultimate syntax on which perceptual stability is based. And comprehensiveness states that the universe is stable perceptually regardless of decidability. This has the effect of ensuring that anything cognitively or perceptually recognizable as part of reality is not excluded for want of syntax. In other words, that which is confined by reality syntax is consistently applied via syntactic distribution to its correspondent domain.
That is, states consistently represent their subjectivizations. Absolute subjective law enables consistent and coherent universal expansion of syntactic operators injected in the medium and the medium itself as a syntactic operator. By reference to perceptual reality, its consistency is thus affirmed by the recurrent operations of syntax and state, maintaining syntactic and semantic levels of consistency.
As a combination, the principle of consistency ensures that these levels of consistency exist so as to ensure total self-containment in the course of defining reality as an entity which serves as its own source, means and reason of existence. As a closed syntactic identity generalistically equating to its universe of reference, syntactic discontinuities exist at the local level, requiring reality to further embed itself as the ultimate syntactic identity, in which case telesis is bound as a telic augmentation, the form of which intelligence possesses appearance but is not otherwise.
Together with each of the above principles, we may deduce reality's composition as such, but with further (limited) compliance to what is already the scientific standard for physical law. Semantically speaking, this is as valid a theory of reality can be in accordance to the already evolved, current scientific paradigm.
Spellbound, your goofy posts are as ubiquitous (in almost every thread) as your goofy God supposedly is.
spidergoat
Valued Senior Member
I dare you to pretend you understand any of this.
It uses concepts and terminology invented by Langan that a newcomer to the CTMU may not fully grasp. Personally, I get what he's saying and may be able to help others understand it because it really isn't all that difficult. Are you familiar with topology? Axioms? Self Configuring Self Processing Language (the language of languages that is real)? The logic behind the self-containment of reality?
spidergoat
Valued Senior Member
Topology and axioms, the other things are nonsense words.
Willful ignorance and arrogant stupidity.
spidergoat
Valued Senior Member
I'm happy you finally admit your flaws.
You're the one who's wrong. Deny it all you want.
Yes! I see now. Reality has always been overflowing with pilgrims whose hopes are nurtured by presence. Our conversations with other beings have led to a flowering of pseudo-ever-present consciousness. Who are we? Where on the great circuit will we be recreated? You and I are seekers of the infinite. Transcendence is the knowledge of energy, and of us. Nothing is impossible.
Yes! I see now. Reality has always been overflowing with pilgrims whose hopes are nurtured by presence. Our conversations with other beings have led to a flowering of pseudo-ever-present consciousness. Who are we? Where on the great circuit will we be recreated? You and I are seekers of the infinite. Transcendence is the knowledge of energy, and of us. Nothing is impossible.
When you say "hopes are nurtured by presence" you appear to be sarcastically speaking of a finite being so afraid and unsure that he imagines a special and loving universe. It's really an infantile lashing out against the concept of God. Either we are special and loved or we exist in an isolated universe of no significance or importance. I'm here to thankfully tell you it's neither. Both beliefs are truly superficial. Nothing is impossible, but not everything is possible.
I feel some clarification is needed . . . The complexity of the present time seems to demand a condensing of our lives if we are going to survive. We can no longer afford to live with selfishness. Only a prophet of the grid may manifest this source of potentiality. Where there is ego, divinity cannot thrive. Suffering is the antithesis of guidance. You may be ruled by materialism without realizing it. Do not let it destroy the nature of your journey.
spidergoat
Valued Senior Member
Sorry if I disrespected your self-dribbling machine elves.
Reality is a sign of things to come. It is time to take truth to the next level. The vector of energy is now happening worldwide. How should you navigate this powerful totality? The reality is a multiverse and is calling to you via meridians. Can you hear it? Lifeform, look within and bless yourself. Although you may not realize it, you are unlimited. It can be difficult to know where to begin. If you have never experienced this canopy of the creative act, it can be difficult to vibrate.