Raising Children Without the Concept of Sin

Why do you think slavery is ''immoral''?
jan.
Woohaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!! Perhaps that was one of the other commandments which remain secret?
jan said,
It makes no difference what you say. You are forced to operate under divine law. And you will be judged by it.
Those who try to sidestep it, and make up their own rules, will be judged by divine law. Get over it! :)

Slavery is not "immoral"? What exactly are you stating with that question?

You cannot deny that slavery is morally acceptable by scripture. So now you question if slavery is in fact "immoral", instead of recognizing that scripture is "side-stepping" moral law???

Remember, you will be judged by divine law? You think you can get over that???...:eek:
 
Last edited:
You'll need to elaborate on that?
No, I don't. You do.
Which is it, Quran, Bible, Torah, Book of Mormons. All of them???
What knowledge?
jan.
You tell us. You claim the knowledge is "contained in scripture", instead of "common secular sense".

Which is it? You don't really know, do you? Or are you afraid of receiving divine demerits?

C'mon jan, fess up!!!
 
Last edited:
Why would you?
You weren't instructed to do so . . . .
"If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them." The Bible could not be clearer than that.

Fortunately most people don't obey that particular divine law.
Those laws were specific to time, place, and, circumstance.
Ah, so divine law always applies, except when it doesn't.

In that case no worries. It doesn't apply whenever people don't want it to.
 
Divine law is any law that is understood as deriving from a transcendent source, such as the will of God or gods, in contrast to man-made law. Divine laws are typically regarded as superior to man-made laws,] sometimes due to an understanding that their source has resources beyond human knowledge and human reason. They are accorded greater authority, and cannot be changed by human authorities.
So no law with a human source - such as your typing, or the Bible - is "divine". Makes sense.
 
"If a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death. Their blood shall be upon them." The Bible could not be clearer than that.

Who said anything about it not being clear?

Fortunately most people don't obey that particular divine law.

It wasn't meant for most people. It was meant for Moses to relay it to the Israelites.
Moses, or the Israelites, were not most people.

Ah, so divine law always applies, except when it doesn't.

They were given to Moses to pass on to the Israelites. Were they not?
Is that not clear to you?

jan
 
Perfect. Jan acknowledges that laws are mutable.

Back on topic?

The wages of sin is death. If you sin you die.
It is because the laws are immutable that they also apply to the Israelites.
For some reason the Israelites thought they were like any ordinary human being.
In fact, according to the bible, they were God's chosen people. They were a holy people, who knew better than to act the way they did.

jan.
 
Slavery is not "immoral"? What exactly are you stating with that question?

Did you read the question?

You cannot deny that slavery is morally acceptable by scripture. So now you question if slavery is in fact "immoral", instead of recognizing that scripture is "side-stepping" moral law???

Remember, you will be judged by divine law? You think you can get over that???...:eek:

I'll ask the question to you...

Why do you think slavery is immoral?

jan.
 
In fact, according to the bible...
Indeed. This is all according to the Bible.
And with that proviso, any individual can take it as self-imposed law. But it only applies to those who choose it.

Sin is still a concept just as well understood by those do not take the Bible literally as those who do, so the OP question is debatable.

So the answer to the OP's question is: "Sure. If you choose to follow the Bible."
 
Indeed. This is all according to the Bible.
And with that proviso, any individual can take it as self-imposed law.

Sin isn't contingent on whether it is accepted, or not.
The bible, or any scripture explains what is already in man's conscience.

Sin is still a concept just as well understood by those do not take the Bible literally as those who do.

Makes not a hoot of a difference.
Sin is a transgression of divine laws, irrespective of belief.

jan.
 
Sin isn't contingent on whether it is accepted, or not.
The bible, or any scripture explains what is already in man's conscience.
And if the Bible were more than a collection of parables, you'd have a point.

Other people from millennia ago telling us what to do is not an obligation for us to abide by it.


Makes not a hoot of a difference.
Sin is a transgression of divine laws, irrespective of belief.
Sure, that is how it is defined. We all get that.
Ectoplasm also has a definition we all accept. That does not make ectoplasm a real thing.

You are still assuming your conclusion in your premise. It is not granted that God spake the Ten Commandments, or that they are anything more than man's words to other men.
Argue in good faith.
 
Sir sir I have a question sir

Is it a sin to go to the Moon?

Do you go through heaven, and see angels, to get there, or is heaven a bit further out sir?

:)
 
Who said anything about it not being clear?
You. You were confused and asking questions about it.
It wasn't meant for most people. It was meant for Moses to relay it to the Israelites. Moses, or the Israelites, were not most people.
OK. So divine law isn't meant for most people. Fair enough. You have reached a good, commonsense conclusion.
 
OK. So divine law isn't meant for most people. Fair enough. You have reached a good, commonsense conclusion.
Oooohh not fair not fair not fair

Us atheist miss out again

When are we going to get some divine law?

:)
 
OK. So divine law isn't meant for most people. Fair enough. You have reached a good, commonsense conclusion.

It's about responsibility.
Within most family structures, there are rules, and conditions to live by, in order to maintain consistencies.
What is expected from a teenage member, will be different to what is expected from the toddler sibling.
The rules apply always, but is espoused differently according to the conscious level of the family member,
The Israelites had more responsibility than other folk, simply because they were personally favoured by God.
With great power comes great responsibility.

jan
 
And if the Bible were more than a collection of parables, you'd have a point.

How does this address my point?

Other people from millennia ago telling us what to do is not an obligation for us to abide by it.

What part of ''conscience'' is it you don't understand?

Sure, that is how it is defined. We all get that.
Ectoplasm also has a definition we all accept. That does not make ectoplasm a real thing.

If your conclusion of whether or not there is divine law, leads you to this kind of reasoning, then you are best left with it.

jan
 
Back
Top