MARK OF THE BEAST:The Real Meaning of 666?

M

Michelle

Registered Senior Member
I was in a Revelation Seminar a year ago and one night,the topic happened to be the number 666--the mark of the beast..the bible said that to those who have knowledge,let him count the number,for it is the number of a man or the "Antichrist"...well,they said that the Pope is the Antichrist:eek: because something on his wardrobe or crown or something has the words written VICARIUS FILII DEI,which means VICAR OF THE SON OF GOD,which is TOTALLY a blasphemy or something like that..and if you agree, count the results of the letters based on Roman Numerals

V = 5
I = 1
C = 100
A = 0
R = 0
I =1
U =5
S = 0
equals: 112

F = 0
I = 1
L = 50
I = 1
I = 1
equals: 53

D = 500
E = 0
I = 1
equals: 501

TOTAL : 666

SHOCKING,INTERESTING,OR WHAT???:confused:

so,what's ur opinion?i won't jump into any conclusions,but it's pretty interesting:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
How about "Michelle?"

Number the letters so A=1, B=2 etc. We get:

Michelle = 13 + 9 + 3 + 8 + 5 + 12 + 12 + 5 = 67

Now take the digits of the result and add them:

6 + 7 = 13

13 is an unlucky number, so Michelle is the number of the unlucky person!

Interesting huh?

Or not.

Numerology is a joke. You can make up anything.

Why choose the words VICARIUS FILII DEI rather than, say "Pope Benedict", or something else? Why choose values based on Roman numerals, rather than the English or Roman alphabet?

It's all just a game. You play around until you get the number you want. Want to get 666? There's plenty of ways of doing that. Give me a little time, and I'm sure I can turn "Michelle" into 666.
 
James R said:
How about "Michelle?"

Number the letters so A=1, B=2 etc. We get:

Michelle = 13 + 9 + 3 + 8 + 5 + 12 + 12 + 5 = 67

Now take the digits of the result and add them:

6 + 7 = 13

13 is an unlucky number, so Michelle is the number of the unlucky person!

Interesting huh?

Or not.

Numerology is a joke. You can make up anything.

Why choose the words VICARIUS FILII DEI rather than, say "Pope Benedict", or something else? Why choose values based on Roman numerals, rather than the English or Roman alphabet?

It's all just a game. You play around until you get the number you want. Want to get 666? There's plenty of ways of doing that. Give me a little time, and I'm sure I can turn "Michelle" into 666.
Click to expand...
well,this isn't my opinion,smarty pants..im just saying what they taught in the seminar,but it doesn't mean we have to believe it..my friend just brought me there coz i was alone and bored in the house... get the picture? GO SMOKE A JOINT :m:
 
It's good to hear that you realise you don't need to believe this rubbish, Michelle.

:)
 
My philosophy teacher was talking about the Mark of The Beast a couple months back. And apparently (I've not looked into it myself so can't validate his claims) all barcodes share the same basic code. And in this code is 666.

So apparently all barcodes carry the mark of the beast.
I also got approached by a load of people in the highstreet trying to convince me that technology was evil and that "God will save us".

But James R's right. It's a total joke. Look for a "sign" long enough and you will find it
 
Zephyr said:
666 = 2*9*37
37 - the largest prime factor of the beast! :eek:
Click to expand...
Ah, yes 2 people in 9 months can produce a new body at 37 degrees C. - the work of the devil - it is all so clear now.:(
-------------
More evidence of devil's work in dance, etc. from: www.brainyhistory.com/daysbirth/birth_february_9.html
Feb. 9, 1937 {2/9/37 birthday of} Johnny Sayles, U.S. vocalist, {biggest hit} You Made Me Wiggle
That is the ONLY listing for that date. - how can you doubters say it is only a joke?????

Want further proof? Say "Johnny Sayles" three times quick. (What are Johns used for?) - Oh _ _ _ _ ! Mankind is doomed by the beast !

:rolleyes:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Billy T said:
Ah, yes 2 people in 9 months can produce a new body at 37 degrees C. - the work of the devil - it is all so clear now.:(
Click to expand...
Indeed. To quote Blackadder:

Edmund: Well, quite -- which reminds me, Aunty--

Aunt: (stands up) Don't call me `Aunty'!!! (slaps him twice)
`Aunt' is a relative, and relatives are evidence of sex,
and sex is hardly a fitting subject for the dinner table. (sits)

Edmund: ...or, indeed, any table.

Percy: ...except, perhaps, a table in a brothel.
Click to expand...
 
Zephyr said:
You mean God is countably infinite?
Click to expand...

Let us assume that a god has some number of properties. Let this number of properties be either finite or infinite. If a god is really a god he must have infinite properties (or else, is he really a god??). We shall label these across the X axis of a table. Now let us assume that there are countably infinite number of gods, and you have listed them down the Y axis of a table. Now I shall define P_i_j to be the jth property of the ith god in your list of countably infinite gods. NOW... I tell you there is a god with the following properties:

G = (P_1_1 + 1)(P_2_2 + 1)(P_3_3 + 1) ... (P_k_k + 1) ...

Now as I have defined him, this god cannot POSSIBLY be in your list of gods. Therefore, gods must be UNCOUNTABLY infinite :)

-AntonK
 
Diagonal god proof. Now I have seen everything :p

25.806975801127880315188420605149 ... the Squareroot of the Beast.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top