Elvis Sibilia's Philochrony theory of everything

How many times are you going to reiterate the same dozen pseudo-sciencey points?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

That's a summary of that I've said so far.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

You post a summary about every dozen posts.

When are you going to actually develop anything you say? So far, it's all beem pseudo-science word salad rhetoric.

I made a "philochrony generator" a while ago that spit out pithy sentences that look a lot like yours, none of which are backed up by logic or maths or anything. How do the things you claim hold any more water than the output of my Philochronizer? Serious question.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

2 and 3 contradict each other. If we only perceive change, then how is anything but change a measurable quantity? We measure change, not time. Time is an abstraction of measurements of relative rates of change.

 

There is no such contradiction. We measure intervals. As change I refer to phenomena. Time or intervals is the distance between two moments in the becoming (changes). Time is not an abstraction, it is magnitive, that is, objective, subperceptible and measurable.

 

And edition

And determine when events occur.

 

Is time a fundamental or emergent property of the universe ?

Time, as Philochrony conceives it, cannot be a fundamental property. Therefore, it is an emergent property. Before we go any further, let's look at some examples of emergent property. A drop of water does not have a tide, but many drops of water forming a sea do have a tide. Tide is an emerging property.

Another example is ants. A single ant does not perform a task, but in a group of ants there are different functions that make up a society.

Another emergent property is life, and with a fundamental property, molecules with carbon.

A fourth example is mind. A single neuron does not generate the mind (intelligence and consciousness). These clump together to form tissues and various tissues make up the brain. From the brain emerges the mind.

Returning to time, a single moment that is like a point without dimension has no time, but in a succession of moments (becoming) a dimension is generated and time emerges.

 

Nope, you forgot plasma.
The jury is out on things like "time" and "life" those things will be illuminated by physics and biology not thought experiments by philosophers.

 

Natural time vs abstract time

With the development of Mathematics, abstract time arises. According to the equations, time flows from the past to the future and from the future to the past. For equations it is the same that time is irreversible.
But natural time only flows in one direction: from the past to the future. This is the law of the arrow of time. The arrow of time is the law itself. Entropy is a law of Thermodynamics, and is an application of the law of the arrow of time.
The events of reality are governed by the law of the time arrow. for example, the life of animals develops from birth to death. An egg that falls to the ground breaks and does not come back up and put itself back together. A song develops from the beginning to the end. Etc etc. etc
Let's remember the definition of time given by Philochrony: time is the periodic evolution that we use to measure the duration of things and determine when events occur. While duration is the continuous succession of irreversible changes that go from the past (before) to the future (after) passing through the present.

 

That's great. Now you're merely quoting yourself.

 

Hahahahaha

 

Enlighten me, what's a science that makes testable predictions and is falsifiable?

 

If it is science all of them.

 

Being that this it is now 4 years and 437 posts of the same silliness expressed about 400 different times, I'm gonna say no.

What Asexperia does not know about science would take ten years of elementary school to undo.

 

Yes, thanks. But that could be more a testable conclusion than a prediction.