No, he rejected astrology and your silly notion of quantum entanglement.
......without any justification.
No, he rejected astrology and your silly notion of quantum entanglement.
Can you see that you don't understand quantum entanglement?Next post without any justification. Can you see that you rejected quantum entanglement?
Can you see that you don't understand quantum entanglement?
This is pure woo-woo. This is a science forum - if you can't back your claim, don't make it. Simple. Don't get mad when people tear your pet woo-woo apart...
O.K. I can see that you assumed that you are the alpha and omega.
Science forum? Partially of course. You should read titles of all sections.
There is many speculations as well and it is O.K.
You, as the moderator, should not discourage people from discussing about inexplorable fully fields of knowledge.
Arrivederci Roma
There is nothing "inexplorable" here... you made a statement, yet cannot provide any evidence for it.
So where's your evidence that quantum entanglement has any connection to astrology?
Or maybe you're just full of BS and don't understand how science works.
You obviously DON'T understand that astrology is woo-woo or what quantum entanglement is.
It is your next nonsensical post without any justification. I can see that you do not understand what you are reading - you just do not understand my very simple sentences and my very clear substantiations.
For you and Kittamaru the woo-woo is the mantra and it is such boorish.
Lack of arguments?