The point was that they have specific gender roles, particularly when it comes to women. Women who exist outside of that 'norm', particularly women who participate and work in a more inclusive society and exist there happily are seen as the enemy of their ideology.
Everything to you is women, isn't it? mass genocide of people, not important, no what matters is they want the women in fix gender roles.
Why do you take everything so personally?
Say the women who said she would key me and would tell every other women to do that same.
Gamergate was a perfect example of just how entrenched sexism is in the gaming community.
No it was a perfect example of your ilks delusion and projection.
Some. The greater majority vote Republican, even when it goes against their best interest.
Yeah and we just need some to completely flip the presidency, the senate and even the house.
You won't get those voters back. Sure, you might pull some of those who work in manufacturing back, but to do that, you would have to go back on Democratic policies in regards to trade and manufacturing to do so.
Seriously? All we have to do is promise them jobs, nothing more nothing less, as long as trump fails in doing that, which he most likely will, we are golden. We take the rich, reduce the finical burden on the poor with free medical care and education and extended welfare and the a demand side economy will blossom.
We don't need to kick out immigrants, de-globalize (which is impossible at this point) nothing like that.
Well the women hating ideology you keep foisting on us here.
How am I hating women?
His memo came out before the whole #MeToo thing took off. Stop using that as an excuse.
I was talking about the "why hire women" article.
He is against it and expressly notes why he thinks pushing for a more diverse work place as Google was apparently doing is bad and he does so by citing the same 'science' white supremacists rely on to tell the world that minorities are stupid and women are weak.
What matters is HOW one pushes for my diverse work place, he approves of more diversity, what matters is if we do it right or if we do it Lysenkoisi. As for the same science white supremacist rely on: does not change if the science is real or not. What matters is what policy is created from the science, the science says Blacks have slightly lower average IQ then whites, ergo the alt-right says that is why they commit so much crime and need to be disposed of, but we could simply provide more education, provide better water supply not filled with lead, etc, policy is what matters. Now damore specifically and repeatedly states that averages mean nothing about the individual, that individual vary and we can't just lump them all together and assume they are all oppressed or not oppressed or what ever, that we need more nuance policy and that we need to be able to have open and frank debate about it, not simply follow and ideology and anyone the questions it is fired.
While again forgetting that going to the police = no protection of the law or privacy.
Absolute bullshit, by the law your name and identity is protected.
And he argued that women and minorities will more than likely not be equally qualified and cited 'biology' as the reason.
Yeah
on average. If you have a career that is prone to autistism spectrum disorder like advance computer programming, you honestly think it would be made of 50:50 men and women?
I wasn't talking about the court system.
You will have to refresh me on what specifically you where arguing.
I was talking about your whining about what women are saying and carrying on like it was a threat.
Well I guess the 'threat' is the social and political consequences of social media as the new justice system for sexual assault will cause.
Your demands that they should only be believed or would be classified as "adults" if they behaved a certain way was what then?
No it is not for us to "beleive" or not believe, it is for a court of law to determine guilt. Adults understand personal belief should mean fuck all.
Why would I do that? I'd just point you out to the women in the room and say 'steer clear'. Probably would not have to anyway, since, ya know, you do have that 'creep' vibe.
Yeah sure that why I get hit on.
As I said, you come across like a misogynistic creep. Your attempts to sway that opinion is failing.
And I should care about your opinion of me? oh that right you want to physically assault me.
I don't consider those outdated theories because it is bunk.
Well that because you deny science in order to fit your world view to your ideology? Once again tell me, are women
on average shorter then men, why is that, let me guess its society?
I get why you embrace it though.
There aren't "special programs" as such, just an encouragement for girls to not drop out of STEM subjects.
No scholarships? How about for men in STEM, none of them need encouragement?
They have only barely scratched the surface of how teachers are grading girls in maths and science in school and how those lower grades are discouraging them from showing interest in that field because of the bias of teachers, who grade boys better than girls, even when the boys do worse. What's the matter? Too many words and not enough pictures for you?
yes yes and they have only scratched the surface of the jewish global network of jews and useful goys, riiiggggghhhhhttt.
Can you at the very least entertain alternate theories?
I provided you with several links showing how the bias is cultural and has nothing to do with biology.
So your 100% sure there is no biological reasons what so ever?
I would not be able to vote for either of them, hence why the answer is neither. Surely you cannot be so dense that you can't figure out why.
Well that is a cope out, and yes I have pointed out you as a non-american: having republican rule us because of people that followed your ideology is basically "let them eat cake" to you. So once again, lets assume your an american citizen, circa 1996, who would you vote for.
I advocate for women and men speaking out when and where they can with full support. I advocate for a police system that does not treat those women like criminals, which would allow them to come forward. I advocate for people having a voice and if that means using social media, then so be it, that is the voice they choose and feel safe using. I would have thought that was fairly obvious by now.
Well that all nice and noble, but the path to hell is made with good intentions. The consequences of what you advocate, of public accusations of crime at the whim of someone, will and is having horrible consequences. Those consequences will be worse then had we just worked to improve the justice system and private accusations made to a court of law.[/quote][/quote][/quote][/quote]
