Email password cracking

Status
Not open for further replies.
shorty_37 said:
Well she was with him for 6 yrs before this seemed to come out of nowhere.
She must have loved the guy alot to have been considering marriage. It's easy to say but when you love somebody that much breaking it off is VERY VERY difficult. She was probably holding on to some kind of hope that her suspisions were bogus, all in her head, but she knew in the back of her mind that she was probably right. She had to make sure 100% so it would give her no way out, in justifying staying with him anymore.
Click to expand...
That's exactly the reason why no one could just tell her to dump him outright, after all it's her life, her emotions and her emotional ties. Hopefully she hasn't done anything stupid because of him though (in regards to her self).

I have to admit there's been multiple times where I have tried to warn my sister off men, she doesn't listen, she moves too fast and then once she's done whatever she's done she feels a little upset that she did what she did even when I told her not to and usually her feeling of elation subsides when the guy that I tried to warn her about starts ignoring her or becoming too busy to see her.

It basically got to the point that I can't do anything to aid her before she makes her mistakes, although I do get to hear all about those mistakes afterwards :( (not in so much detail though)
 
Last edited:
Atom said:
hmm I can't say I blame you.

Yes, I would snoop on him and if he suggests that you don't trust him then you should ask him why he doesn't trust you.

As you're engaged to be Married I'd hesitate to suggest anything drastic but no, I don't think you are at all paranoid. Anyone with any sense would do exactly the same but I can't say it bodes well for a happy marriage.

Sorry.:shrug:
Click to expand...

Oh well, at least I called it right. Just like always.

Theres always a silver lining behind every dark cloud. :p
 
Well she can see my email if she wants, Just while she's in the account could she delete all the spam for me?
 
Can I just say I did NOT hack anyones email, I installed a key logger. And the actual computer I did it on was purchased BY ME and as far as Im aware I have every right to put surveillance on my own property!!!
So I dont know what anyones going to sue me for, we dont really do that whole sueing thing here in the UK anyway.
And its tough **** that his parents & friends know about his cheating ass, he should have thought about that before he jumped into bed with his skanky ex whilst BEING ENGAGED TO ME!!!! :mad::mad:
 
sonicgirl said:
Can I just say I did NOT hack anyones email, I installed a key logger. And the actual computer I did it on was purchased BY ME and as far as Im aware I have every right to put surveillance on my own property!!!
So I dont know what anyones going to sue me for, we dont really do that whole sueing thing here in the UK anyway.
And its tough **** that his parents & friends know about his cheating ass, he should have thought about that before he jumped into bed with his skanky ex whilst BEING ENGAGED TO ME!!!! :mad::mad:
Click to expand...

Ah you didn't mention you OWNED the computer, If you'd said that I would of said by all means install whatever you want.

They had something similar occur in the states some time back, it was in regards to a State employee being on holiday and someone above them basically accessing their computer while they were away because they thought they'd been using it for personal use rather than state use.

In essence the STATE owned the computer therefore if the STATE decided it wanted to check on what the employee was doing on it, it was fair enough. (However the overall story brought a load of backlash on the guy that asked for his machine to be accessed)

So if you have a relationship in the future you'd have a very simple method to prove your loyalties.

Swap Phones with one another, That way you get to see who they have been
calling and vice versa.
As for email, get a POP3 account as they are easy enough to rig up so that a person can access emails on the server but can't DELETE them (accidentally atleast.)

Anyhow, your Free and Single now, not time to regret what's gone on, you can go out now with your Girlfriends, Flirt and torture a few souls, which is something you haven't been able to do in a while ;)
 
sonicgirl said:
Can I just say I did NOT hack anyones email, I installed a key logger. And the actual computer I did it on was purchased BY ME and as far as Im aware I have every right to put surveillance on my own property!!!
So I dont know what anyones going to sue me for, we dont really do that whole sueing thing here in the UK anyway.
And its tough **** that his parents & friends know about his cheating ass, he should have thought about that before he jumped into bed with his skanky ex whilst BEING ENGAGED TO ME!!!! :mad:
Click to expand...


You did not hack his email, only forwarding his private stuffs. Aint it equally
bad? :confused: Ok, I will not talk from moral point of view. I understand that you
are angry, but I am telling you this also not for my benefit. Think about this
for a second: your (ex) fiancee losing his credibility at work, that girl (his ex)
also becomes a laugh material. What if they harm you back? :confused:

P.S: good for you that there in UK they did not sue people over such acts.
Next time think again about the consequences, pls. For your own safety.
 
sonicgirl said:
Can I just say I did NOT hack anyones email, I installed a key logger. And the actual computer I did it on was purchased BY ME and as far as Im aware I have every right to put surveillance on my own property!!!
So I dont know what anyones going to sue me for, we dont really do that whole sueing thing here in the UK anyway.
And its tough **** that his parents & friends know about his cheating ass, he should have thought about that before he jumped into bed with his skanky ex whilst BEING ENGAGED TO ME!!!! :mad::mad:
Click to expand...

Forget about him, don't waste any more of your life thinking about him. Just move on. He's over.
 
sonicgirl said:
Well yesterday whilst he was at his 'friends' I called someone round to change all the locks on the house...
Click to expand...

Whoa! Reap the frigging whirlwind! Nice one. Ignore the monkeys who say you did something wrong - you didn't. As long as you're here, look around the forums and stay a while.

Man. What a frigging burn. I'm still laughing. Congratulations on taking control, and getting your life back. It was hard, but you did the right thing from the start.
 
Take the good advice even if it comes from monkeys. You're the only one
who knows whether something could be destructive or constructive for
yourself :)
 
Cheating... lol. You mean you refuse sex so that he has to do the deed elsewhere. Your own fault.

Typical scenario after marriage.
 
UK's Computer Misuse Act 1990:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_Misuse_Act_1990

The Act was created to criminalize unauthorized access to computer systems (the s1 offence) and to deter the more serious criminals from using a computer to assist in the commission of a criminal offence or from impairing or hindering access to data stored in a computer (the ss2 and 3 offences). The basic offence is to attempt or achieve access to a computer or the data it stores, by inducing a computer to perform any function with intent to secure access. Hackers that program their computers to search through password permutations is therefore liable, even though all their attempts to log on are rejected by the target computer. This makes all versions of hacking code designed to crack the security in operating systems unlawful whether or not harm is intended and no matter what the motive might be, e.g. simple curiosity or responding to a security system seen as a challenge. The only precondition to liability is that the hacker should be aware that the access attempted is unauthorized. Thus, using another person's username or identifier (ID) and password without proper authority to access data or a program, or to alter, delete, copy or move a program or data, or simply to output a program or data to a screen or printer, or to impersonate that other person using e-mail, online chat, web or other services, constitute the offence
Click to expand...


In 2004 the All Party Internet Group published its review of the law and highlighted areas for development. Their recommendations led to the drafting of the Computer Misuse Act 1990 (Amendment) Bill. which sought to amend the CMA to comply with the European Convention on Cyber Crime [1]. Under its terms, the maximum sentence of imprisonment for breaching the act changed from six months to two years.
Click to expand...


Computer Misuse Act 1990 cases:

http://www.computerevidence.co.uk/Cases/CMA.htm


There are more than 40 cases of law suit listed over there. One of them is as
I quote here:


Ex-employee of Bloomberg financial news agency used another employee's authorised account to delete and modify emails and to send obscene messages to subscribers. Defendant convicted. Sentence of 12 months conditional discharge. Costs order of £160.
Click to expand...

:confused:
 
Neither of the above two comments are related to this case. The computer was her own.

Proceed, Citizens.
 
GeoffP said:
Neither of the above two comments are related to this case. The computer was her own.

Proceed, Citizens.
Click to expand...

But not the e-mail data, chat data, internet data that it collects from other people.
 
Here:

A wife who installed spyware on her husband's computer to secretly record evidence of an extramarital affair violated state law, a Florida court ruled Friday.

The Florida Appeals Court, Fifth District said that Beverly Ann O'Brien "illegally obtained" records of husband James' online conversations with another woman as the two played Yahoo Dominoes together.

"It is illegal and punishable as a crime under (state law) to intercept electronic communications," wrote Judge Donald Grincewicz on behalf of a three-judge panel.

He and the two other judges barred Beverly O'Brien from revealing the contents of the intercepted conversations, and said the chat records could not be introduced as evidence in the unhappy couple's divorce proceedings.

At issue in this case was whether the use of the spyware, called Spector, violated Florida's wiretapping law. The law says anyone who "intentionally intercepts" any "electronic communication" commits a criminal act. (The case was a civil lawsuit arising out of the divorce proceeding, not a criminal prosecution.)
Click to expand...

http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009_22-5577979.html
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top