Write4U's wobbly world of word salad woo

RE: Write4U's wobbly world of word salad woo
SUBTOPIC: What we read, what we glean, and what we learn!
⁜→ et al,

(OPENING)

The Laws of Thermodynamics, which summarize the properties of energy, were the point of origin for this discussion. This is not to be confused with the Weak Force, the Strong Four, the Electromagnetic Force, and the yet-to-be-discovered Force Carrier for Gravety (the geometry of Space-Time) which are the essentials for understanding the universe.

Having an advanced degree myself, I have to constantly remind myself that the degree is only a credential for achievement in the academic community. It has nothing to do with how intelligent I am or the level of knowledge I have captured and managed to retain.

I do not need a degree to tell me how intelligent I am. Not any layman needs such a degree. When conversing with a scientific layman you must remember to look at the intent of - and meaning behind - what they are imparting. That is to say, it is incumbent on you to express the accepted scientific terminology, but not nit-pick the layman for the mismatch of that term. You must look for the original thought. Remember that Michael Faraday (1791–1867) did not have a degree, yet was the one who kickstarted the study of electrochemistry and electromagnetism. He had what we call "original thought." Yet in his day, he was denied acceptance into the Royal Academy for decades. I marveled at the fact that Professor Albert Einstein had a photo portrait of Faraday on the wall of his study at Princeton. And we still teach the equations of the eminent Cambridge Professor James Maxwell (1831-1879) (Awarded the Fellowship of the Royal Society of Edinburgh). But "original thought' is the key:

Physicist Ernest Rutherford (1871–1937)(Nobel Laureate) stated, "When we consider the magnitude and extent of his (Faraday's) discoveries and their influence on the progress of science and of industry, there is no honor too great to pay to the memory of Faraday, one of the greatest scientific discoverers of all time.​
Michael Faraday had a similar problem to the one criticized here. It is fair to disagree on a concept or principle (maybe even both), but not strike as an ad hominem.

(CONTRIBUTION)

1741390686108.png

"5. The Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution of molecular speeds for molecules of various mass and at different temperatures. Note that light molecules have higher average speeds than heavy molecules. The distribution has consequences for the composition of planetary atmospheres, as light molecules (such as hydrogen and helium) may be able to escape into space."
Bibliography and References


  • Professor Peter Atkins (Doctorial Advisor) (© 2007) FOUR LAWS THAT DRIVE THE UNIVERSE, First published 2007, Published in the USA by Oxford University Press Inc., New York , Chapters 1 thru 5.
  • Sir Robert Penrose (Nobel Laureate) (Copyright © 2004) THE ROAD TO REALITY A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe, First published in Great Britain in 2004 by Jonathan Cape Random House, 20 Vauxhall Bridge Road, London SW1V 2SA
pastedGraphic.png
Most Respectfully,
R​
.​
 
RE: Write4U's wobbly world of word salad woo
SUBTOPIC: What we read, what we glean, and what we learn!
⁜→ et al,

(OPENING)

The Laws of Thermodynamics, which summarize the properties of energy, were the point of origin for this discussion. This is not to be confused with the Weak Force, the Strong Four, the Electromagnetic Force, and the yet-to-be-discovered Force Carrier for Gravety (the geometry of Space-Time) which are the essentials for understanding the universe.

Having an advanced degree myself, I have to constantly remind myself that the degree is only a credential for achievement in the academic community. It has nothing to do with how intelligent I am or the level of knowledge I have captured and managed to retain.

I do not need a degree to tell me how intelligent I am. Not any layman needs such a degree. When conversing with a scientific layman you must remember to look at the intent of - and meaning behind - what they are imparting. That is to say, it is incumbent on you to express the accepted scientific terminology, but not nit-pick the layman for the mismatch of that term. You must look for the original thought. Remember that Michael Faraday (1791–1867) did not have a degree, yet was the one who kickstarted the study of electrochemistry and electromagnetism. He had what we call "original thought." Yet in his day, he was denied acceptance into the Royal Academy for decades. I marveled at the fact that Professor Albert Einstein had a photo portrait of Faraday on the wall of his study at Princeton. And we still teach the equations of the eminent Cambridge Professor James Maxwell (1831-1879) (Awarded the Fellowship of the Royal Society of Edinburgh). But "original thought' is the key:

Physicist Ernest Rutherford (1871–1937)(Nobel Laureate) stated, "When we consider the magnitude and extent of his (Faraday's) discoveries and their influence on the progress of science and of industry, there is no honor too great to pay to the memory of Faraday, one of the greatest scientific discoverers of all time.​
Michael Faraday had a similar problem to the one criticized here. It is fair to disagree on a concept or principle (maybe even both), but not strike as an ad hominem.

(CONTRIBUTION)

View attachment 6580

"5. The Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution of molecular speeds for molecules of various mass and at different temperatures. Note that light molecules have higher average speeds than heavy molecules. The distribution has consequences for the composition of planetary atmospheres, as light molecules (such as hydrogen and helium) may be able to escape into space."
Bibliography and References


  • Professor Peter Atkins (Doctorial Advisor) (© 2007) FOUR LAWS THAT DRIVE THE UNIVERSE, First published 2007, Published in the USA by Oxford University Press Inc., New York , Chapters 1 thru 5.
  • Sir Robert Penrose (Nobel Laureate) (Copyright © 2004) THE ROAD TO REALITY A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe, First published in Great Britain in 2004 by Jonathan Cape Random House, 20 Vauxhall Bridge Road, London SW1V 2SA
pastedGraphic.png
Most Respectfully,
R​
.​
Atkins was your PhD advisor!?
 
Having an advanced degree myself, I have to constantly remind myself that the degree is only a credential for achievement in the academic community. It has nothing to do with how intelligent I am or the level of knowledge I have captured and managed to retain.
I disagree.
Sure a degree requires hard work, meeting deadlines, application etc but it also requires intelligence.
I am not saying you have to be a genius but you need to able to memorise, understand and apply a concept.
If we are talking degree level then those concepts can get tricky.
PhD? Trickier!

What was your subject Rocco? Are you a Yank?

I'm under no illusions, my UG was applied Biology, all my mates called me the "soft science" student!
Chemistry IS harder conceptually, then physics, then Mathematics.
In my view but I'm open to your views Sir.
 
RE: Write4U's wobbly world of word salad woo
SUBTOPIC: What we read, what we glean, and what we learn!
⁜→. Pinball1970, et al,
Atkins was your PhD advisor!?

What was your subject Rocco? Are you a Yank?

I'm under no illusions, my UG was applied Biology, all my mates called me the "soft science" student!
Chemistry IS harder conceptually, then physics, then Mathematics.
In my view but I'm open to your views Sir.
(RESPONSE #1)

No. I'm sorry if you got that impression. The parenthetical notation was to point out that he was an advise in Cambridge. I did attend several of his open lectures.

Yes, I am American.

(RESPONSE #2)

I have a triple-staged Science Degree (BS) (Human Ecology) (The Ohio State University) and an additional undergraduate Science Degree (Bhs.B). My graduate degree (Mhs.M) in Humanistic Sciences, with a follow-up doctorial program earning my Ph.D in Metaphysics from the Institute. Builtin to my OSU Undergraduate was the completion of the Astronomy Series and the basic trig and Calculus Series. I am also signed off by the Dr Ayssla Goodman, holding the Robert Wheeler Willson Professor of Applied Astronomy, Harvard University for the completion of the science series PredictionX: Omens, Oracles, and Prophecies. So, I have a mixed bag (hard and soft routes of study) in my formal academic history with more than one set of perspectives.

pastedGraphic.png

Most Respectfully,
R
 
RE: Write4U's wobbly world of word salad woo
SUBTOPIC: What we read, what we glean, and what we learn!
⁜→. Pinball1970, et al,

(RESPONSE #1)

No. I'm sorry if you got that impression. The parenthetical notation was to point out that he was an advise in Cambridge. I did attend several of his open lectures.

Yes, I am American.

(RESPONSE #2)

I have a triple-staged Science Degree (BS) (Human Ecology) (The Ohio State University) and an additional undergraduate Science Degree (Bhs.B). My graduate degree (Mhs.M) in Humanistic Sciences, with a follow-up doctorial program earning my Ph.D in Metaphysics from the Institute. Builtin to my OSU Undergraduate was the completion of the Astronomy Series and the basic trig and Calculus Series. I am also signed off by the Dr Ayssla Goodman, holding the Robert Wheeler Willson Professor of Applied Astronomy, Harvard University for the completion of the science series PredictionX: Omens, Oracles, and Prophecies. So, I have a mixed bag (hard and soft routes of study) in my formal academic history with more than one set of perspectives.

pastedGraphic.png

Most Respectfully,
R
That’s interesting about Atkins. I didn’t realise he had given lectures at Cambridge. He’s been a Fellow of Lincoln College, Oxford ever since my time. (I attended his lectures on quantum chemistry in the 1970s.)
 
That’s interesting about Atkins. I didn’t realise he had given lectures at Cambridge. He’s been a Fellow of Lincoln College, Oxford ever since my time. (I attended his lectures on quantum chemistry in the 1970s.)
See: Lapis Lazuli: Some Real Chemistry for Mr G
 
RE: Write4U's wobbly world of word salad woo
SUBTOPIC: What we read, what we glean, and what we learn!
⁜→. Pinball1970, et al,

(RESPONSE #1)

No. I'm sorry if you got that impression. The parenthetical notation was to point out that he was an advise in Cambridge. I did attend several of his open lectures.

Yes, I am American.

(RESPONSE #2)

I have a triple-staged Science Degree (BS) (Human Ecology) (The Ohio State University) and an additional undergraduate Science Degree (Bhs.B). My graduate degree (Mhs.M) in Humanistic Sciences, with a follow-up doctorial program earning my Ph.D in Metaphysics from the Institute. Builtin to my OSU Undergraduate was the completion of the Astronomy Series and the basic trig and Calculus Series. I am also signed off by the Dr Ayssla Goodman, holding the Robert Wheeler Willson Professor of Applied Astronomy, Harvard University for the completion of the science series PredictionX: Omens, Oracles, and Prophecies. So, I have a mixed bag (hard and soft routes of study) in my formal academic history with more than one set of perspectives.

pastedGraphic.png

Most Respectfully,
R
Are you joking about the metaphysics omens, prophecy part?
 
Are you joking about the metaphysics omens, prophecy part?
RE: Highest Education Challenge

※→ exchemist, Pinball1970, et al,​


Yes, I'm 72 years old and this has happened before.

For some reason, this site rejects my HarvardX.pdf as a "wrong file type."

As far as attending lectures, you are correct. While Professor Atkins is still on the lecture circuit I tend to mix up who taught where. I believe you (exchemist) might be correct.

1611604183365-png.448413.png
Most Respectfully,
R
 
Last edited:
Are you joking about the metaphysics omens, prophecy part?
RE: Highest Education Challenge

※→ exchemist, Pinball1970, et al,​


Yes, I'm 72 years old and this has happened before.

For some reason, this site rejects my HarvardX.pdf as a "wrong file type."

You may verify my PhD Certificate Number MID202916ROS the Institute Number is (855) 898.4848
You may verify Certificate Number is 0ce0fbeee12345188b9c0c06a548d80c at Harvard/edx

As far as attending lectures, you are correct. While Professor Atkins is still on the lecture circuit I tend to mix up who taught where. I believe you (exchemist) might be correct.

Most Respectfully,
R
 
RE: Highest Education Challenge

※→ exchemist, Pinball1970, et al,​


Yes, I'm 72 years old and this has happened before.

For some reason, this site rejects my HarvardX.pdf as a "wrong file type."

You may verify my PhD Certificate Number MID202916ROS the Institute Number is (855) 898.4848
You may verify Certificate Number is 0ce0fbeee12345188b9c0c06a548d80c at Harvard/edx

As far as attending lectures, you are correct. While Professor Atkins is still on the lecture circuit I tend to mix up who taught where. I believe you (exchemist) might be correct.

Most Respectfully,
R
What might be interesting is to see a link to your thesis, as the subject sounds rather curious and unorthodox. But if you are around my age, as you seem to be, I don't suppose it will be available in electronic form.
 
What might be interesting is to see a link to your thesis, as the subject sounds rather curious and unorthodox. But if you are around my age, as you seem to be, I don't suppose it will be available in electronic form.

"You may verify my PhD Certificate Number MID202916ROS the Institute Number is (855) 898.4848
You may verify Certificate Number is 0ce0fbeee12345188b9c0c06a548d80c at Harvard/edx"


The Institute Number checks out as...
The Metaphysics Institute (Premier Online University)
https://metaphysicsinstitute.org/
 
Last edited:
"You may verify my PhD Certificate Number MID202916ROS the Institute Number is (855) 898.4848
You may verify Certificate Number is 0ce0fbeee12345188b9c0c06a548d80c at Harvard/edx"


The Institute Number checks out as...
The Metaphysics Institute (Premier Online University)
https://metaphysicsinstitute.org/
Yuck, that website has the riot of fonts and colours one associates with crankdom.

Looks like a shonky diploma mill to me at best, if not an outright scam.

This guy has never been anywhere near Harvard. :rolleyes:
 
"You may verify my PhD Certificate Number MID202916ROS the Institute Number is (855) 898.4848
You may verify Certificate Number is 0ce0fbeee12345188b9c0c06a548d80c at Harvard/edx"


The Institute Number checks out as...
The Metaphysics Institute (Premier Online University)
https://metaphysicsinstitute.org/
Being curious, I had a look at that diploma mill website. Did you realise you can get a degree from them in Bigfoot studies? :biggrin:
 
Being curious, I had a look at that diploma mill website. Did you realise you can get a degree from them in Bigfoot studies? :biggrin:

Also a Ufology Degree.

At what sort of company, looking for someone to fill a vacancy, are these degrees going to impress?

Employer thinks…what sort of person goes out their way to get this kind of 'degree' ?
 
Last edited:
You are getting completely mixed up. Heat is an emergent property of atoms as has been explained to you and are explained by the laws of thermodynamics.
A wave function is in the realm of quantum mechanics and relates amongst other things to the probabilistic nature of the micro world.
Are you telling me that a quantum has no value?
Are you telling me that heat is not a measurable quantity in any form? A wave frequency is not the very definition of a measurable value?
You are using mathematical terms to explain that there no measurable values?

James Clerk Maxwell in his 1871 Theory of Heat outlines four stipulations for the definition of heat: It is something which may be transferred from one body to another, according to the second law of thermodynamics. It is a measurable quantity, and so can be treated mathematically. See more
As I have said before, it has nothing to do with human codified symbols. It has to do with relational values that have a measurable effect on other relational values.
Everything has a mathematical value. There is nothing that has no value in some form, inherent or emergent. If it has no value it is nothing.
And even nothing has a relational value to something. Name me a single thing that is not mathematical (an expresssible value) in essence.
 
p.s. Cognition starts at mineral level. Of course it is not conscious cognition, but when something interacts with something else, such as oxidation the visible affective response to the activity is a form of pre-cognition. This is not meta physical. It is physical, testable, repeatable.

Bacteria communicate with each via a species' specific language that has a vocabulary. It is called "quorum sensing".
A quorum is the minimum number of people required to be present at a meeting before it can begin or decisions can be made. It is often specified in corporate charters for shareholder meetings.
Process of cell-to-cell communication

In biology, quorum sensing or quorum signaling (QS) [1] is the process of cell-to-cell communication [2] that allows bacteria to detect and respond to cell population density by gene regulation, typically as a means of acclimating to environmental disadvantages. [3]
Each species of bacteria has its own language (words). Moreover bacteria are also multilingual and can communicate via a form of Esperanto.

Is there such a thing as meta-physics that has NO VALUE? I believe that to claim physics to be the be all, end all of matter in the Universe is premature and prejudicial.

Note that I am a hard atheist, but this is a whole different issue.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top