working model of the universe, dimensions, gravity, and energy

Daecon said:
That doesn't explain why you think that.

At the moment it just sounds like "I think this is true because I made it up" and that just isn't good enough.
Click to expand...

As Dywyddyr pointed out some days ago, try saying "Borocz" in a Japanese accent.

He and I both think that is the key to understanding our friend here. :D
 
trevor borocz johnson said:
space has the four forces built into it like a density that allows for the atoms and the EMR to move within confined limits i.e. the speed of light, fusion, etc.. Each change in dimension is a dramatic change in the 'density' of space. When a quark leaves the universe wall it expands because of the density of space in the new dimension it is in. The quark then becomes a block of void that creates space in the outside dimensional universe. It takes time to expand and its density adds pressure to the surrounding space, this pressure in empty space is what causes gravity.
Click to expand...
speed of the universe and universal lifetime is just luck like a red dwarf's planetary system where the star burns for 100 billion years vs our sun to be a 10 billion year star.
 
trevor borocz johnson said:
speed of the universe and universal lifetime is just luck like a red dwarf's planetary system where the star burns for 100 billion years vs our sun to be a 10 billion year star.
Click to expand...
I want to acknowledge your post over on my thread, and say that I took another look here. Something in me wants to say keep it up, you're making me look good, lol, but then it is hard to grasp and visualize other dimensions, universe walls, a block of void creating space in the outside dimensional universe, etc. It doesn't resonate with my views at all, but let me peak in later and see how it is going.
 
One has to remember that a teaspoon full of quarks is the weight of the earth. When you talk about a quark you're not talking about feathers or sand. As a material it has a lot of weight. Incredibly dense for its size it filters space through it and as Einstein's and my theory holds the gravity field is like a ball on a large piece of cloth.
 
Write4U said:
The fewest components to construct a 2D *plane* is the *triangle*. From the triangle we can build 3D decahedrons and it is suspected that the universal construct is a dodecahedron.
Click to expand...
uh huh and what if the pieces were to get stuck facing the wrong direction. Then you create a Rod Serling place between dimensions known as the Twilight Zone.
 
trevor borocz johnson said:
uh huh and what if the pieces were to get stuck facing the wrong direction. Then you create a Rod Serling place between dimensions known as the Twilight Zone.
Click to expand...
They cannot face the wrong direction, the *fabric* (field) of the universe unfolds through the fractal function. See CDT (causal dynamical trinagulation) Renate Loll.
Causal dynamical triangulation (abbreviated as CDT) invented by Renate Loll, Jan Ambjørn and Jerzy Jurkiewicz, and popularized by Fotini Markopoulou and Lee Smolin, is an approach to quantum gravity that like loop quantum gravity is background independent.
This means that it does not assume any pre-existing arena (dimensional space), but rather attempts to show how the spacetime fabric itself evolves
Click to expand...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causal_dynamical_triangulation
 
Write4U said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causal_dynamical_triangulation
Click to expand...
"Using a structure called a simplex, it divides spacetime into tiny triangular sections. A simplex is the multidimensional analogue of a triangle; a 3-simplex is usually called a tetrahedron, while the 4-simplex, which is the basic building block in this theory, is also known as the pentachoron. Each simplex is geometrically flat, but simplices can be "glued" together in a variety of ways to create curved spacetimes,..."
I think hidden in Einstein's coined term 'spacetime' is the meaning that two substances exist in the vacancy of void, the substance of space and the substance of energy. The honeycomb universe theory uses the substance matter and energy, termed void and energy, matter void and space being the same substance just as time and energy are, to describe the effects of many observed phenomena like gravity, magnetism, water pressure, thermal heating in nuclear decomposition etc.. So my question is where is the time in the causal dynamical triangulation theory of spacetime? Also where it says "Each simplex is geometrically flat, but simplices can be "glued" together in a variety of ways to create curved spacetimes,..." is this suggesting that a mass with a gravity field would change the geometrical pattern of spacetime? If so how would it change back?
 
since the speed of light, time and energy, depends on the density of space in the dimension you're in, I suppose time could be a constant across all dimensions infinitely but that counters the idea of the speed of matter which has to take time to settle into nature when it passes through a universe/quark, but how could those two things both be true? Time as it relates to the density of space, meaning that in the outside universe to our own the space is unimaginably less dense and big. Theoretically you could look out your window and observe any sun or moon in the sky from this dimension ( that is if were not in some nebula) just not directly but it s there. Anyways the speed of light in this dimension would be an unimaginable multiple of the our own speed of light. Could this mean that life in both dimensions moves at the same speed?
 
Last edited:
trevor borocz johnson said:
I can think of some test experiments that are well out of my reach but for example one might measure accuratley the distance to the wall of the big bang on all sides to determine that the universe is moving through us not just occurred all at once. It might give us an idea of how fast the universe is moving as well
Click to expand...
actually one might do that, skipping the hard part of a parallax view with the earth taking pictures from opposite sides of the sun, by just adjusting the zoom on the telescope reguralry and seeing if one direction reaches the edge of the visible zone first. That's a shortcut something math teachers hate me for cause I hate all that in between work.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top