Word of the Day. Post it Here

It wasn't a post of a new word; it was an answer to your question about what the original post by redarmy meant.
I see. Well most of those terms were new to me, so I thought you were introducing them. My mistake, sorry.
I deliberately chose a piece with fairly inoffensive synonyms,
I agree, that's why I didn't edit it myself.
But yes you are correct and it is possible that someone particularly sensitive could find them upsetting. Deletion probably best.
I think that's unlikely so again, that's why I didn't edit it. I just didn't want to start a trend and have the next guy post his entire vocabulary of four-letter words.
I'm not here to scare people off.
You could have just said "breasts," dude! Or researched the origin of some of those words I've never heard of. I'm sure that would have been interesting. :)
 
IYou could have just said "breasts," dude! Or researched the origin of some of those words I've never heard of. I'm sure that would have been interesting. :)

The number of synonyms was interesting in itself, linguistically.
The eskimos only have seven words for snow.

You don't want to set a precedent for body part posts
and I can see how that might become troublesome.
 
The eskimos only have seven words for snow.

snow - kaniktsqaq
no snow - aputaitok
to snow - qanir, qanunge or qanugglir
snowy weather - nittaatsuq or qannirsuq
to get fine snow or rain particles - kanevcir
first falling - apingaut
light falling - qannialaag
wet and falling - natatgo naq
in the air, falling - qaniit
feathery clumps of falling snow - qanipalaat
air thick with snow - nittaalaq
rippled surface of snow - kaiyuglak
light, deep enough for walking - katiksugnik
fresh without any ice - kanut
crusty - sillik
soft for travelling - mauyasiorpok
soft and deep where snowshoes are needed for travel - taiga
powder - nutagak
salty - pokaktok
wind-beaten - upsik
fresh - nutaryuk
packed - aniu
sharp - panar
crusty that breaks under foot - karakartanaq
rotten, slush on the sea - qinuq
best for building an igloo - pukaangajuq
glazed in a thaw - kiksrukak
watery - mangokpok
firm (the easiest to cut, the warmest, the preferred) - pukajaw
loose, newly fallen snow which cannot be used as it is, but can provide good building material when compacted - ariloqaq
for melting into water - aniuk
that a dog eats - aniusarpok
that can be broken through - mauya
floating on water - qanisqineq
for building - auverk
on clothes - ayak
beaten from clothes - tiluktorpok
much on clothes - aputainnarowok
crust - pukak
cornice, formation about to collapse - navcaq
on the boughs of trees - qali
blown indoors - sullarniq
snowdrift that blocks something - kimaugruk
smoky drifting snow - siqoq
arrow-shaped snowdrift - kalutoganiq
newly drifting snow - akelrorak
space between drifts and obstruction - anamana or anymanya
snowstorm - pirsuq, pirsirsursuaq or qux
violent snowstorm - igadug
blizzard - pirta or pirtuk
avalance - sisuuk or aput sisurtuq
to get caught in an avalance - navcite

Some of the Inuit definitions for snow, courtesy of one of my favorite books, which I highly recommend for lovers of words:
The Meaning of Tingo and Other Extraordinary Words From Around the World by Adam Jacot de Boinod

(please excuse any typos, the Inuit languages are a bit difficult to transcribe)
 
that a dog eats - aniusarpok

Good Post.

The "Eskimos have Seven words for snow" is an old cliche.
I wonder who was the first person to say it.

But why do the Inuit have a word for snow that a dog eats.
Maye they mean it's snow that's no good.

Inuit1: "Here's some good snow for building an igloo."

Inuit2: "Good Snow? That's Aniusarpok!"

btw It's only a few minutes since you posted this,
but it's already the top result for a search for aniusarpok on google.
google must be trawling this site continuously.
 
Last edited:
btw It's only a few minutes since you posted this,
but it's already the top result for a search for aniusarpok on google.
google must be trawling this site continuously.

This is also now on google. No wonder people are always spamming this site.
 
snow - kaniktsqaq... no snow - aputaitok... to snow - qanir, qanunge or qanugglir...
Obviously this language is synthetic, agglutinative, or some other type that combines morphemes to build new "words." You can see that under qanir. With no knowledge of the language beyond what you've posted, I can't reduce this list to seven words, but someone with that knowledge might be able to.

An Inuit, at least one from a few centuries ago, might say, "Gosh you anglophones have so many words for 'person': watchman, fireman, brakeman, con man, straight man, front man..."
The Meaning of Tingo and Other Extraordinary Words From Around the World by Adam Jacot de Boinod
Someone else recommended that. I ordered it yesterday.
(please excuse any typos, the Inuit languages are a bit difficult to transcribe)
You need a flatbed OCR scanner. :)
But why do the Inuit have a word for snow that a dog eats. Maye they mean it's snow that's no good.
Actually the definition one of my friends came up with is more accurate: "Fraggle, if a dog won't eat something, it's no good." Dogs will only eat things for hydration, nutrition, or to replenish their intestinal bacterial culture. Perhaps aniusarpok is soft enough to quench thirst, contains frozen insects that are a good source of protein, or has some animal's stool with lots of bacteria.
It's only a few minutes since you posted this, but it's already the top result for a search for aniusarpok on google.
Uh... How many people are googling for aniusarpok anyway? Only the Inuit and the people who bought that book even know the word. :)
This is also now on google. No wonder people are always spamming this site.
Hey, don't knock it. I originally found this website accidentally by using a search engine. It was probably Dogpile, Google wasn't around yet. I can't speak for all the moderators, but I think we get a really low volume of spam. Trolls, on the other hand, are a big nuisance. I just had to slap one down.
 
Hypozeuxis

A sentence where each subject has its own verb, producing parallel clauses.
A rhetorical device.

eg

"We shall fight on the beaches.
We shall fight on the landing grounds.
We shall fight in the fields, and in the streets,
We shall fight in the hills. We shall never surrender!"

—Winston Churchill


If Winston had got the codebreakers at Bletchley to work on a grammar checker
instead of the enigma code, we might have got:

We shall fight them on the beaches, landing grounds, fields, streets and hills,
and never surrender.

This is a prozeugma.
An improvement?


Etymology
Greek word Hypo=below
Greek word Zeugma=yoking


Zeuxis was a Greek painter who died laughing at
a painting he had just made.

Nine people who died laughing:
http://www.canongate.net/Lists/Death/9PeopleWhoDiedLaughing
 
Last edited:
Hypozeuxis: A sentence where each subject has its own verb, producing parallel clauses. A rhetorical device.
I've never heard the word before. Thanks! You got the definition a little wrong: it should be "A sentence in which each verb has its own subject." If it were the other way around, the example would be:
We shall fight on the beaches, you shall fight on the beaches, the Boy Scouts shall fight on the beaches, the Union of Concerned Scientists shall fight on the beaches, and the Mormon Tabernacle Choir shall fight on the beaches.
But they gave you a bad example:
We shall fight on the beaches. We shall fight on the landing grounds. We shall fight in the fields, and in the streets. We shall fight in the hills. We shall never surrender!
If this is an accurate transcription of the quote, it is not a hypozeuxis. A hypozeuxis is a single sentence. The classic is:
I came, I saw, I conquered.
In order for Churchill's pronouncement to be a hypozeuxis, it must be a single sentence like Caesar's:
We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields, we shall fight in the streets, we shall fight in the hills, we shall never surrender.
That gets kind of rambly and doesn't seem like Churchill's style. The breakdown of parallel construction in the final clause really makes it suspicious. Any style manual would call that a stylistic error and as an editor I personally would flag it. He would have put the period after "hills" so that all the previous clauses had "fight" as their verb.

You can spot such an error by deliberately "dis-hypozeuctifying" :) it:
We shall fight on the beaches, on the landing grounds, in the fields, in the streets, in the hills, and in (or on) the...
whoops--"never surrender" cannot be fit into that pattern!
 
This is the speech. Remember to pronounce Nazi as Narzee, which was something which particularly annoyed Hitler:
Churchill had much trouble with his teeth. A problem his Nanny put down to his youthful fondness for pickles.

Even though large tracts of Europe and many old and famous States have fallen or may fall into the grip of the Gestapo and all the odious apparatus of Nazi rule, we shall not flag or fail. We shall go on to the end, we shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our Island, whatever the cost may be, we shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender, and even if, which I do not for a moment believe, this Island or a large part of it were subjugated and starving, then our Empire beyond the seas, armed and guarded by the British Fleet, would carry on the struggle, until, in God's good time, the New World, with all its power and might, steps forth to the rescue and the liberation of the old.

The punctuation here is so strange, that I think it must be original.
Two sentences.
 
Last edited:
Nerd, Dork, Geek

According to some Dork on another thread, the inhabitants of
Sciforamia all belong to these categories, but What's the difference?

Nerd
A bookish but likeable individual with few friends.
Etymology.
Numerous. But I like "Drunk" backwards, Knurd, becoming nerd

Dork
Need not be particularly clever. Socially and physically clumsy.
Most likely of the three to end up in prison.
Etymology.
Unknown. Supposed to be the word for a Whale's Penis.

Geek
A nerd whose main interest is computers.
Most likely of the three to end up being a millionaire.
Etymology
From an old word for fool.
eg in Shakespeare's Twelfth Night:

Why have you suffer’d me to be imprison’d,
Kept in a dark house, visited by the priest,
And made the most notorious geck and gull
That e’er invention play’d on? tell me why.


The words all have four letters.
Words with four letters which describe types of people tend to be disparaging
eg Yank (American) Prod (Protestant) Brit (English person)
 
Last edited:
This is the speech. Remember to pronounce Nazi as Narzee, which was something which particularly annoyed Hitler.
That is just the standard British way of mangling words assimilated from foreign languages. Back in my college days we called it the Don JOO-uhn Principle. I've heard Brits pronounce tequila as tee-QUILL-ah and of course their three-syllable version of the word kha-GWAHR, which they use as an auto marque, is infamous. We don't pronounce any of those words quite right either, but at least they all have the correct number of syllables and the accent on the correct one. We're actually pretty close with te-KEE-luh.
The punctuation here is so strange, that I think it must be original. Two sentences.
The punctuation is nonetheless proper, if indeed strange. I wonder whether he dashed it off, intending for it only to be spoken, not distributed in writing. Even the best writers slack off when aiming for oral rather than written eloquence. It could be that the punctuation was "cleaned up" later. In those days he might very well have never given anyone his own written draft; what we're reading may be a transcription after the fact by journalist on staff.

In any case the hypozeuxis form is so weak that it makes a poor example. Caesar's is much more powerful, especially in the original language:
Veni, vidi, vici.
Three verbs, all standing alone with no subject, all in the preterit tense. Of course in Latin a hypozeuxis may be far more compact than in English, since the verb inflections include an implicit subject. Churchill's example is woefully deficient in parallel construction, and I doubt very much that such a master of the King's English would have submitted that draft for print media.
Nerd: A bookish but likeable individual with few friends.
A definition steeped in irony. Likeable individuals generally have many friends. :)
Etymology: I like "Drunk" backwards, Knurd, becoming nerd.
That's suspicious. A common trait of nerds is unflagging seriousness and pedantry, reflected in moderation or total abstinence from alcohol. A drunken nerd is a rare sight and usually confined to first-year university parties.
Dork: Need not be particularly clever. Socially and physically clumsy. Most likely of the three to end up in prison. Etymology: Unknown. Supposed to be the word for a Whale's Penis.
When I first heard the word in the 1960s it was a variation of calling someone a "dick," and occasionally the word was used as a verb for intercourse performed with no thought for the partner's feelings--or even her name. :) So a Dork is indeed a big, clumsy Dick. But in those days there was no overtone of malice or true antisocial behavior. Dorks were unpopular but we would not have expected them to ever be arrested. (The legal doctrine of "date rape" was several decades off, of course.)
Geek: A nerd whose main interest is computers. Most likely of the three to end up being a millionaire. Etymology: From an old word for fool, eg in Shakespeare's Twelfth Night
Missing an important step here. In the early 20th century and presumably the 19th, a geek was a very specific member of circus and carnival troupes. (The squeamish are advised to skip the rest of this paragraph). My father's generation was quite familiar with the word, meaning, "A performer who bites the heads off of live chickens for entertainment." The only true "geek" alive today is Ozzy Osbourne, and he is indeed fairly wealthy. :) I believe he has reformed since the "cute little rubber bat" that the fan threw onto the stage turned out to be a real one and he had to undergo the ignominious treatment for suspected rabies.
The words all have four letters. Words with four letters which describe types of people tend to be disparaging, eg Yank (American) Prod (Protestant) Brit (English person)
Odd. We Americans don't feel disparaged when Europeans call us "Yanks." Southerners bristle a bit: a Yankee is a Northener, a term that survives from the Civil War. WWII was a strong force for reunification of our country; soldiers were touched by the experience of Yankees and Rebels fighting on the same side and endured being lumped together by the grateful Europeans. I don't believe that any American means "Brit" to be an insult; I toss the word around myself on SciForums and I certainly hope no one has taken offense. I hate to call the present-day inhabitants of the south of Great Britain "Britons," since they are the descendants of Germanic occupiers who marginalized the true Celtic Britons, and of course of the subsequent Norman French occupiers who carried on the tradition. The Scots have a better claim to the name since they are at least a Celtic people.
 
The nerd being drunk backwards refers to the nerds habit of studying while the jocks (US word) are partying. It is the reverse of drunk. He's sober.


Ozzy Osbourne might do well these days to bite the head off his appalling wife, Sharon.

Churchill's speech is like the rolling English road.
It gets there via a circuitous and picturesque route.

Have you got access to an OED. I'd like to see a proper definition of Hypozeuxis. I don't trust these online versions.
 
`
Carcajou
'kaa(r)ku`joo

Carcajou is the old French pronunciation for Kwi'kwa'ju, the name given by the Micmac People to the wolverine, a small and fierce carnivore of the Canadian wilderness.

In the Micmac People's tongue, Kwi'kwa'ju means "evil spirit".
 
Have you got access to an OED. I'd like to see a proper definition of Hypozeuxis. I don't trust these online versions.
I don't have an OED. Wikipedia has an exhaustive treatment of zeugma, including hypozeuxis, which is its opposite. It even includes Winston Churchill's example from the OP.

I can see how the second and third examples could be condensed, e.g. "Fear leads to anger which leads to hate which leads to suffering."

I do not see how the first one can be condensed, so I don't understand why it needs to be identified as a hypozeugma. It is phrased as concisely as it can be without losing details of the meaning, e.g., "People in the diverse group performed various actions."
The Hypozeuxis is the opposite of a zeugma, where each subject has its own verb.
The parents scowled, the girls cried, and the boys jeered while the clown stood confused.
"We shall fight on the beaches. We shall fight on the landing grounds. We shall fight in the fields, and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills. We shall never surrender!"—Winston Churchill
"Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering" - Yoda, Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back.
 
Someone in Chicago is selling a tiny print 1971 edition of the OED on eBay. I wonder what it will fetch.
Why would anyone want:
  • A hard copy that can't be searched with an automated word processor;
  • A 36-year-old edition that doesn't reflect the technology, politics, culture and foreign borrowings of a very lively third of a century;
  • Even more infuratingly small print than a normal dictionary?
 
As the old saying has it: you can't grep dead trees.
Hard copy still has advantages though.


[Edit]
Pick on Fraggle time;
Even more infuratingly
Infuratingly??? WTF? :)
 
Last edited:
Hyperhedonia

The feeling of an abnormally great pleasure in any act or happening.

Etymology
From Gk. hyper (prep. and adv.) "over, beyond, overmuch, above measure" and hedonikos "pleasurable," from hedone "pleasure," related to hedys "sweet."


Now, whenever I find it amusing to endlessly flip a coin, play with magnets or rubber bands, or otherwise engage in mindless diversions, I will know what to call it.
 
Why would anyone want:
  • A hard copy that can't be searched with an automated word processor;
  • A 36-year-old edition that doesn't reflect the technology, politics, culture and foreign borrowings of a very lively third of a century;
  • Even more infuratingly small print than a normal dictionary?

An old copy of one of the world's greatest works of scholarship is better than none at all. It's the result of tens of thousands of hours of research by hundreds of cloistered supernerds. At the moment, someones going to get that for $30 inc postage. Bargain!

A dictionary this size will always be behind anyway. It's like painting the Forth Bridge. Once you're finished, you need to begin again at the other end.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top