Have you ever seen a Harry Potter film?
I've read the books--well I'm a patient man who waits to buy them used, so I just finished "Order of the Phoenix." I could borrow one from any of fifty friends but their hard-backs are too bulky to take on the subway.
I saw the first movie. I wanted to love it but it lived down to my expectations. It was a wonderful portrayal of a world in which magic is real, wizards go to college and goblins run banks. The quidditch match, mythical creatures, the halls of Hogwarts--I really felt like I was there. Unfortunately it was not the world I had developed in my mind from reading, so the images kept conflicting with the ones I had stored. I rarely enjoy films made from the books I love.
All said, to me the draw of Harry Potter's saga is as much
the story, with all its nuances of history, relationships and kids growing up, and the archetype of the hero being dragged kicking and screaming by fate into his heroic role, as it is the escapism of whimsy being real. It would take several hours to render that story into film. Condensing it into standard "feature length" leaves in the whimsy but condenses out the nuances.
Lord of the Rings was a major exception precisely because it was not: They took nine hours to tell that story.
Have no fear, I am a tireless fan of magic and whimsy. My list of all-time favorite films includes Allegro Non Troppo, Bedazzled (the original), Being There (I also loved the book but it was a tiny book), the Dark Crystal, Fantasia, Ghostsbusters, the Muppet Movie, the Music Man, the Neverending Story, Sergeant Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band, the Wizard of Oz and Yellow Submarine.
I love Alan Dean Foster's
Spellsinger books, and I carry Piglet in my pocket because "somewhere in the woods, a little boy and his bear are still playing."
About what you'd expect of a Fraggle, I suppose. Some people still think we are mythical creatures and all those noises in the basement are just the pipes expanding and contracting.
