Why Mercury's precession is not as big as Earth? (5.75" < 11.45")

[exchemist]

Tony: we don't need your constant updates: "Waiting... still waiting .... still waiting... It's been 9 days... It's been 13 days .... It's been 173 days... still waiting..." etc.

Just let us know when Nature rejects your paper, okay?

That has evidently now happened: http://www.sciforums.com/threads/doppler-effect-of-gravitational-field.163203/#post-3636784

So now he's trying, yet again, to get an audience for it on this forum instead.

 

[TonyYuan]

So now he's trying, yet again, to get an audience for it on this forum instead.

Neddy and I made a very meaningful discussion in this thread.
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/doppler-effect-of-gravitational-field.163203/ .

We are only exploring science and contributing to the exploration of the universe.

 

[exchemist]

Neddy and I made a very meaningful discussion in this thread.
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/doppler-effect-of-gravitational-field.163203/ .

We are only exploring science and contributing to the exploration of the universe.

Meaningful? When you don't even know what the Doppler effect is? You've seemingly built a whole theory claiming to explain gravitation via the Doppler effect, yet not once has any of your maths included a frequency or wavelength. So you're talking out of your arse.

You're just another two-a-penny, delusional anti-relativity crank - and apparently a more than averagely ignorant example of the type.