Why do theists reject evolution?

Michael 345 said:
Strange how theist prefer to think their first ancestor was mud. Well mud shaped and made human by god

god not smart enough to let first life form to arise from non life, branch and progress into forms suitable to their surrounding conditions

Perhaps, given the numerous descriptions of god he did not make us in his image. Perhaps he adopted our image once it became reasonably established

:)
Click to expand...
But surely our first ancestor was mud, wasn't it? Or something like mud, in some muddy, perhaps volcanic, pool or deep sea vent. Isn't that what most abiogenesis hypotheses propose?
 
exchemist said:
But surely our first ancestor was mud, wasn't it? Or something like mud, in some muddy, perhaps volcanic, pool or deep sea vent. Isn't that what most abiogenesis hypotheses propose?
Click to expand...

Agree like mud. I read clay would be a better choice. Something to do with the structure lending itself to chains of cavities where the proto amino acids could form

Also remember dust was given a mention. Regardless, dust, mud,clay, pool, deep sea vent, none of those received a Bibitty - Bopitty - Boo in the hands of god to become human. Nor a finger poke to start the process

:)
 
Michael 345 said:
Agree like mud. I read clay would be a better choice. Something to do with the structure lending itself to chains of cavities where the proto amino acids could form

Also remember dust was given a mention. Regardless, dust, mud,clay, pool, deep sea vent, none of those received a Bibitty - Bopitty - Boo in the hands of god to become human. Nor a finger poke to start the process

:)
Click to expand...
Be careful or Write4U will show up with an irrelevant web link about aluminosilicates. :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top