And it can be changed right back.
Why do I feel like a stranger in my own country?
- Thread starter mountainhare
- Start date
- Status
And it can be changed right back.
Being "racist" is part of a well rounded education. White people who aren't racist are just idiots that have been brainwashed into meekly accepting their own displacement.
Huh? Don't you mean "You are an idiot."? In which case, it's "You're an idiot." See? The "you" and the "are" have been contracted into "you're". The use of "your" indicates possessive ...which I'm sure you didn't mean.
So now, .....who's the idiot?
Baron Max
Hey, I like that!! It does rather explain a lot, don't it?
Can I copy it and use it?
Baron Max
Huh? Don't you mean "You are an idiot."? In which case, it's "You're an idiot." See? The "you" and the "are" have been contracted into "you're". The use of "your" indicates possessive ...which I'm sure you didn't mean.
So now, .....who's the idiot?
Baron Max
your also an idiot ad are only saying that to defend a fellow racist. i dont use appostraphes youre does not look right. and if i made an exception for that, then i would have to start typing everything correctly, and before you know it i would be using capital letters, correct sentance structure and all around good grammar. wich will take up alot of time.
peace.
it would have been better and more acceptable if you constructed your sentance like this. Hey, I like that. It does rather explain a lot doesn't it.
also the first "it" was not needed. "can i copy and use it" would be ok.
peace.
Why not? Why's it not a "shining moment"? Or would you prefer that people lie about who they like and who they want to be friends with and who they want to associate with? Is that what you'd call a "shining moment" for us? To be liars?
Baron Max
now, this is a prime example of somebody who does not know when to include a full stop/period into his text. and a classic example of a run on sentance.
peace.
I agree, there are SO MANY BETTER reasons to hate people.
Baron Max said:
Most people who aspire to move beyond their own racism, sexism, and other negative -isms do so because they do not consider the giving over to superstition among their brighter acts.
For instance, let's use me as an example: Were I to make the same leaps that Sciforums' racist contingent wants, the truth is that white people are the problem. Even if we put aside all of the abstractions about economy, education, dignity, and the socio-economic roots of crime and unrest, the truth is that the greatest and most abundant evils visited upon me have been at the hands and consciences of whites.
It was whites, not blacks or hispanics, that beat me for being Asian when I was a child. It was a white teacher--not a black, hispanic, asian, or otherwise--who held me in detention for the crime of being assaulted. It was a white school principal who used a 6-10 white professional basketball player with an accent as a role model to explain why I shouldn't let racial violence bother me. It was a white guy who abused his daughter, who happened to be a good friend of mine. It was a white guy who raped at least one good friend of mine. It was a white preacher who lied about the dead and left us all wondering what the hell just happened when I was fifteen and saying farewell to a schoolmate. It was a white guy who stole my car when I was in college. (It was also a white guy who tried to bill me for the costs of storing my car while it was missing.) It was a couple white punks who broke into my car and stole a few tapes and my radar detector. It was a couple of white punks who broke into my brother's car and stole his CDs and my daughter's DVDs. It was a white cop who wrote the bogus incident report when I was arrested. It was a white man who explained to me, in the 1990s, that exploited children working dangerous jobs under poor safety conditions ought to be thankful to even have a job.
In all my life, I can only recall being wronged in any relevant sense by a nonwhite twice. Once, at a track meet, a black kid called me "honky", which got a hearty laugh out of my teammates. (The irony of someone who gets shit for having Asian blood being called a honky ... hell, my teammates were white teenagers, and even they could understand; that should count for something, shouldn't it?) And then it was most likely a nonwhite who stole my car last year, but we shouldn't be so rash as to draw that conclusion merely from the facts of a badly-constructed blunt and the radio being set to KUBE 93.3 FM.
Even if I could construct a thesis that whites are the real problem, though, there are myriad factors contributing to that suggestion. In the end, I can no more pretend the white disposition toward sleaziness and hatred is genetic than our racist contingent could prove the genetic inferiority of nonwhites. In truth, we are all human, and before we can blame genetics, we must consider the influences over how genes are expressed in society. As such, to rest comfortably on racism is to submit to superstition, and history shows that resting on superstition accomplishes less good than the pursuit of truth.
Certainly, we have worse moments than the act of giving over to superstition, but the terrible moments in our lives are definitively connected to our surrender to one or another superstition, myth, or other surrogate in lieu of truth. That we are not perfect is a challenge, not an excuse.
Last edited:
I mean i'm white and I have black, mexican and a philpino friend, I have my racist moments just the same as any1 but every1 is human just like I am we are all brothers and sisters in a sence, but people look for something diffrent about a persons looks and judge them by that.
It is "you're" not "your"...idjit.
Sure you can use it. I probably stole it from somewhere. The term "racist" is a Marxist invention used to silence white people into accepting their own displacement.
edit: I highly recommend reading "Their Only Weapon"
http://westernsurvival.blogspot.com/2006_06_01_archive.html
Their Only Weapon
A correspondent on Lawrence Auster's site, commenting on republican Arkansas Governor Huckabee's feeling that racism is fueling the anti-immigration sentiment, wrote:
"All he has to do is stand up there, give one inane comment after another and use the word that puts trembling in the hearts of the American people and shut them down. Racist."
A cartoon I saw recently showed a Mexican-flag-waving illegal snarling at a white man, saying something like "Let me into your prosperous country, you damned racist xenophobe." It captured perfectly the dynamic involved in the immigration debate: people who have no leverage other than guilt are using it to control us.
What are they going to do the day that white people stop running from that word, "racist"?
I have begun, among my white friends, to acknowledge that I am a racist. I say, "If by racist, you mean that I think there are actual differences, genetic differences, between racial groups that have real consequences, then yes I am a racist. If you mean that I feel more of an affinity for people of my ethnic group, that I feel more comfortable and at home with them, then yes I am a racist. If you mean I put the interests of my people, my ethnic group, ahead of the interests of others just as I put my family's interests over others, then yes I am a racist. But if by "racist" you mean someone who believes in genocide or slavery or hatred or oppression of other ethnic groups, then no, I am not a racist."
I sense that many white people have had enough of being bullied with the "racist" label. But there are two ways of handling that accusation. One is to claim that you're not actually a racist. This is the approach most whites take right now, but it hands all of the power over to the non-white person, who can then act as judge and jury on the evidence to decide whether the white person is a racist or not. The other approach is to say, "yeah, I'm a racist; so what?" There is no answer to that. If you prefer your own people and put their interests ahead of others' without engaging in hatred or violence, what's it to them?
Perhaps the non-whites and liberals are flinging the "racist" accusation with such vehemence because they sense that the white majority is losing patience. Their one tool, their one way of controlling white people, is losing its efficacy, so they ramp up the volume and the bitterness to try to keep the upper hand. Their worst nightmare is that white people stop flinching at the word because that will be the day that anti-whites (both non-whites and whites who scorn whiteness) lose their only weapon.
But while we need to assert that we, like every other healthy people on earth, are indeed "racists", what we want to avoid this time is letting the pendulum swing back the other way into hatred. We don't want another Hitler. We don't want burning crosses. We don't want oppression and injustice. We just want to assert our right to survive as a distinct people and to separate ourselves physically and politically from those who threaten our safety, prosperity, and unique identity.
mountainhare:
What makes you think that in another couple of generations, the current Asian immigrants, for example, won't find themselves in exactly the same position as your Slavs, French and Spanish people, with regard to your cultural acceptance?
I think you just prefer familiarity - you'd like the whole of Australia to be jsut like your home town, just on a bigger scale. You're afraid of difference. You're afraid to face an unfamiliar world. Probably, you like being a big fish in a small pond.
I don't think your perception is accurate. The majority of places in your university are Commonwealth supported places for Australian citizens. Your university does, however, provide many services to you using money it obtains from full-fee paying foreign students, who in effect subsidise your education.
So do you.
You're just worried you're not given the preferential treatment you think you deserve for some reason.
Look where patriotism is leading America. I'm not convinced it's such a great thing.
Australia is not be "invaded" by foreigners. It's like you get your information from One Nation, or something. Australian immigration policies are among the most restrictive in the world. We let in who we choose to let in.
Also, do you know what the number 1 country of origin is for Australian immigrants? England. I don't see you complaining about all the English immigrants. You're only worried about the ones who have different coloured skin to yours. It's just xenophobic racism.
With Sudoku, you're in good company. Effectively, you make yourself a laughing stock among decent people.
It's such a shame that the current strong Australian economy is being buoyed up by all those nasty successful businesses run by nasty immigrants, isn't it?
There's no invasion. Immigrants are invited to apply for Australian citizenship and residency.
Want to change things? Don't run to Sudoku - he and his KKK buddies are just impotent noise-makers. Instead, petition your government, or run for office yourself, making your policies public. Who knows? You might be the next Pauline Hanson.
Are you afraid an immigrant might take the job you feel you're entitled to? You do realise that many people can't afford a university education like yours, don't you? You're immensely privileged, and yet you pick on groups who are often struggling to make their way in the world, while you get opportunity served up on a platter to seize or squander as you see fit.
Go to it. It would be good for you to get out and see the world, and hopefully broaden your limited horizons. Have you ever been outside Australia? Ever been outside Victoria?
Ganymede:
No. That's not true.
What makes you think that in another couple of generations, the current Asian immigrants, for example, won't find themselves in exactly the same position as your Slavs, French and Spanish people, with regard to your cultural acceptance?
I think you just prefer familiarity - you'd like the whole of Australia to be jsut like your home town, just on a bigger scale. You're afraid of difference. You're afraid to face an unfamiliar world. Probably, you like being a big fish in a small pond.
I don't think your perception is accurate. The majority of places in your university are Commonwealth supported places for Australian citizens. Your university does, however, provide many services to you using money it obtains from full-fee paying foreign students, who in effect subsidise your education.
So do you.
You're just worried you're not given the preferential treatment you think you deserve for some reason.
Look where patriotism is leading America. I'm not convinced it's such a great thing.
Australia is not be "invaded" by foreigners. It's like you get your information from One Nation, or something. Australian immigration policies are among the most restrictive in the world. We let in who we choose to let in.
Also, do you know what the number 1 country of origin is for Australian immigrants? England. I don't see you complaining about all the English immigrants. You're only worried about the ones who have different coloured skin to yours. It's just xenophobic racism.
With Sudoku, you're in good company. Effectively, you make yourself a laughing stock among decent people.
It's such a shame that the current strong Australian economy is being buoyed up by all those nasty successful businesses run by nasty immigrants, isn't it?
There's no invasion. Immigrants are invited to apply for Australian citizenship and residency.
Want to change things? Don't run to Sudoku - he and his KKK buddies are just impotent noise-makers. Instead, petition your government, or run for office yourself, making your policies public. Who knows? You might be the next Pauline Hanson.
Are you afraid an immigrant might take the job you feel you're entitled to? You do realise that many people can't afford a university education like yours, don't you? You're immensely privileged, and yet you pick on groups who are often struggling to make their way in the world, while you get opportunity served up on a platter to seize or squander as you see fit.
Go to it. It would be good for you to get out and see the world, and hopefully broaden your limited horizons. Have you ever been outside Australia? Ever been outside Victoria?
Ganymede:
No. That's not true.
You should read post #97. Being racist could mean as little as preferring the company of other white people instead of blacks. I assume you prefer and care more about your own family than other families. Just because you do doesn't mean you hate everyone else's family.
First, it is not necessarily hate, and second it usually has nothing to do with "how people look". The idea that we are all the same except for different paint jobs is a lie which the government, media and education system promotes.
- Status