Why are Racists Racist?

Status
Not open for further replies.
cool skill said:
When one human believes that other humans are of a sub-race, that is racism. Whether applying hatred or inferiority to another race, it remains racism.
Click to expand...

I never said that blacks are sub-human.
 
Muslim said:
Yeah but without the bitch's (women) then you can't get the children, first you need to get the bitch (woman) before you can have the kids.
Click to expand...

Babe, you are a joke.
 
Muslim said:
I am not a racist. traditionally the back race have under achieved. Stating facts doesn't make you a racist it makes you intelligent.
Click to expand...
It is racism only when you attribute underacheivemnt to biological racial reasons.
 
cool skill said:
Same here. Muslim shows phtos of himself clrealy being black. And his blackness sure doesn't come from no tan.
Click to expand...

Just proves I am not racists. As I CAN APPRECIATE OTHER CULTURES!
 
White people have commited more genocide than anybody on this planet.
People are not genocidal because they are white.
The lack of logic of racists know no bounds.
 
Muslim said:
blacks would rather be pimpin' selling drugs, shooting guns, spreading aids, etc. Rather then getting an education. They excel in those kind of situations.
Click to expand...
This is pure racism.
This has no basis in fact or logic.
 
samcdkey said:
The physical appearance difference between the two U.S. endogamous groups is due to selection. The recent decoding of the human genome enables molecular anthropologists to track recent population admixing. Everyone carries traces of the past in his or her DNA—markers that identify the populations and sub-populations to which your ancestors belonged. After Columbus, the New World was repopulated by millions of Europeans and Africans who blended with the few natives that had survived Afro-European diseases for which they lacked immunity. Almost all inhabitants of the New World today have DNA that is a mixture from European, Native American, and, yes, African ancestors. It has become routine to identify what fraction of a person’s genome comes from each of the continents. This is usually done for medical purposes, but for about $160, you can order it done just out of curiosity.

It turns out that about one-third of White Americans have between two and twenty percent recent African genetic admixture, as measured by the ancestry-informative markers in their DNA This comes to about 74 million White Americans. And yet, your day-to-day experience teaches that virtually all White Americans look, well, White. Some may look more Mediterranean and others may look more Nordic, but very few White Americans have a distinctively African appearance. How can one reconcile DNA measurements with common experience?

There is an immediate answer to this question, and a deeper answer. The immediate answer is that many different genes identify continent of ancestry. Labs use as many as 175 markers to determine a person’s ancestral continent-of-origin admixture ratios. On the other hand, only a handful of genes encode for the few superficial, externally visible features (skin color, hair curliness, etc.) that Americans see as “racially” significant. Parental genes are randomly recombined at each passing generation. And so it often happens through sheer chance that an individual inherits many invisible African DNA markers, but few or none of the handful of alleles that encode for “racial” appearance. Another person can inherit those few alleles that encode for visible “racial” appearance but otherwise inherit invisible but ancestrally informative European admixture markers.

The deeper answer is that detailed analysis of the range of phenotype variation (like skin tone, for instance) shows that a long-term biological selection process has unmistakably affected the genetics of White Americans. Few if any White Americans display a strongly African appearance, despite having detectable African admixture because those Americans who “look Black” have for three centuries been assigned involuntarily to the Black endogamous group, whatever their genetic admixture. Centuries of court records show that people of mixed ancestry who “looked White” often had the option of either adopting a White self-identity, thus joining the White endogamous group, or a Black self-identity, thus joining the other group. But people of mixed ancestry who “looked African” lacked such a choice. U.S. society has always assigned such people to membership in the Black endogamous group, like it or not. In short, U.S. society has unwittingly applied selection pressure to the color line. The only American families accepted into the White endogamous group have been those whose African admixture just happened not to include the half-dozen alleles for dark skin (or the other traits associated with “race”). Since those particular alleles were sifted out of the portion of the White population that originated in biracial families, the result has been genetic selection of the White U.S. population for a European “racial” appearance, regardless of their underlying continent-of-ancestry admixture ratio.
Click to expand...

Fascinating.
I wonder how the IQs of those who have "black" genes but look white compare to those with just "white" genes.

cool skill said:
This has no basis in fact or logic.
Click to expand...

It has a basis in both, actually. There are a great deal of statistics that show the underachievement of blacks when it comes to being civilized, and their overachievement when it comes to raping and being ignorant.

D'ster keeps showing you graphs. Can you read a graph?
 
Roman said:
It has a basis in both, actually. There are a great deal of statistics that show the underachievement of blacks when it comes to being civilized, and their overachievement when it comes to raping and being ignorant.
Click to expand...

It shows this in the social context of the USA.
 
According to the same logic it is now proven that muslims are less intelligent, and more criminal according to the statistics in Holland.
 
I imagine using the same logic, you'd find the same for fundamentalist christians, and most fundamentalists in general.
 
Racists are racist because they believe in cultural preservation.

Note: no successful examples of multiculturalism exist in history. You'll see the joke's on you soon.
 
Roman said:
It has a basis in both, actually. There are a great deal of statistics that show the underachievement of blacks when it comes to being civilized, and their overachievement when it comes to raping and being ignorant.
Click to expand...
You are an idiot with no basis in logic.
Such statistics do not give any indication of any racial desposition.
You are to stupid to understand that Race-X has more porverty than Race-Y does not mean that people of Race-X are genetically predisposed to poverty because of their race.

As I have stated the majority of genocides and mass killings have been commited by whites.
It does not mean they commited them because the white race is genetically predisposed to commiting mass muder.

You truly are a complete and illogical moron.
Stop using illogical arguments, and using statistics to skew the logic of the situation.
 
cool skill said:
You are an idiot with no basis in logic.
Such statistics do not give any indication of any racial desposition.
You are to stupid to understand that Race-X has more porverty than Race-Y does not mean that people of Race-X are genetically predisposed to poverty because of their race.

As I have stated the majority of genocides and mass killings have been commited by whites.
It does not mean they commited them because the white race is genetically predisposed to commiting mass muder.

You truly are a complete and illogical moron.
Stop using illogical arguments, and using statistics to skew the logic of the situation.
Click to expand...

Oh this is priceless. Moneyboy is trying to use the logic my great white ancestors invented, but the poor tarbaby can't even write coherent sentences.

When I run into black people like you, I can't help but feel where racists are coming from.
 
cool skill said:
As I have stated the majority of genocides and mass killings have been commited by whites.
It does not mean they commited them because the white race is genetically predisposed to commiting mass muder.
Click to expand...

It means the white race is predisposed to kicking ass.
 
THIS IS THE LOGIC OF AN IDIOT

Out of 100 blacks and whites.
80 blacks eat sushi.
20 whites eat sushi.
Therefore, it is because of racial genetics that blacks like to eat sushi.


Out of 100 blacks and whites
80 whites commit rape this year.
20 blacks commit rape this year.
Therefore, it is because of racial genetics that whites commit rape.


Out of 100 blacks and whites.
80 blacks live in poverty.
10 whites live in poverty.
Therefore, it is becacuse of racial genetics that blacks live in poverty.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top