Try something that isn't incoherent fallacy.
For instance, try to not deliberately misrepresent white supremacism.
LOL. FFS, look in the mirror, you colossal hypocrite.
Like I said, try something more than fallacy. You haven't actually said enough for anyone to refute. To wit, "no one with more than two functioning brain cells", as such, ought to expect anyone to fall for your KKK fallacy.
Also, if you want people to think you're an intelligent person who isn't a white supremacist, it's probably best if you don't lead with white supremacism and characteristic pretentious ignorance. Lazy lulzing is a troll job; you're now obliged, argumentatively, to demonstrate affirmatively that the KKK is the whole of white supremacism in the U.S., per
#18↑ above.
Maybe pretending you're an idiot isn't the best pretense for recycling overworn insults. You want people to believe you're not a white supremacist, stop acting like one; it's true, reinforcing
that with some actually intelligent discourse would go a long way toward helping people understand why you behave dysfunctionally. Of the one sentence in
#35↑ that isn't utterly fallacious—
i.e., the question, despite being presented as an insult in lieu of any actual argument—we might observe that people witness and endure its effects daily, on large scale, in the United States.
Ignoring well-established history in order to cram the whole of white supremacism into the KKK is, indeed, fallacious; it is also so wonderfully useless for not really offering anything substantial to consider. That is, you have presented such an uninforming and, apparently, uninformed argument that nobody can really figure out what you're on about. The principle of charity is what it is, but at this point a coin toss 'twixt ignorance and disruption isn't exactly a kind assessment; you really have offered nothing but contempt and fallacy.
Even more so with your second try:
If anyone knew what argument you were actually making, they might try, but since you can't be bothered to tell them, nor even make sense—
—the only thing anyone has to go on is the example you set by your conduct.
Which, in turn, isn't new. Flaccid, embittered fallacy is hardly a new phenomenon among the "not a white supremacist" crowd that apparently just can't help but argue white supremacist gutter tropes. If I remind that lazy lulzing is a troll job, it is the most charitable description of the rhetorical result before us.
