John J. Bannan
Registered Senior Member
With scientists taking the lead in discoveries and practical applications of knowledge, what good are philosophers today? Are they irrlevant reminders of a by-gone day?
With scientists taking the lead in discoveries and practical applications of knowledge, what good are philosophers today? Are they irrlevant reminders of a by-gone day?
..., what good are philosophers today? Are they irrlevant reminders of a by-gone day?
Well, think of it this way, philosophers are still discussing and arguing about the same things that philosophers have been discussing and arguing since the beginning of time, and there have been few, if any, answers forthcoming.
In any other human endeavor, what would we say about a person or persons that produced so little over such an enormous length of study or work?
Baron Max
IF that is true, then you are the current product of that failure.
Well, think of it this way, philosophers are still discussing and arguing about the same things that philosophers have been discussing and arguing since the beginning of time, and there have been few, if any, answers forthcoming.
I don't think the ethics of stem cell research, for example, have been discussed and argued since the beginning of time.
No, that's true, James .....but they're still discussing what "ethics" is and means, so it don't much matter about stem cell research, does it?
But don't worry, James, 10,000 years from now, philosophers might get around to figuring out "ethics" and then they can take up the issue of stem cell research.
Philosophy is as always will be very important.
This being said, the whole arguement falls to smitherenes! ***KABOOIE***
I don't think you comprehend the distinction between ethics and meta-ethics which, admittedly, is a little subtle.
But they're already discussing stem-cell research. They're way ahead of you.
So ...just saying something makes it factual and true?
Baron Max
Philosophy is like a godstone to me, there are things which can be done with it, that I personally, believe have not been done!
They just don't understand the importance... (IMO) of epistemology!
Oh, I don't worry about that ...in a few years, the philosophers will invent "meta-meta-ethics" to explain the meta-ethics!
If so, then they'll still be discussing it 10,000 years from now with no agreed resolutions whatsoever.
Epistemology. As I have said. There is no "truth" like you have thought, instead, it is something possible, some mannageable.Like what?
So, if it's so important, please explain it to me .....and don't forget to show how it's important. Just saying that it's important doesn't do jackshit!
Baron Max
We're all scholars here. If you write a concise definition of epistemology, somewhere between M-W.com and a Wiki article, I'm sure we'll understand it.I don't feel right now like elaborating on an epistemological goal. If you don't understand the defination of epistemology, do some re-search... IEP, google it, internet encyclopedia of philosophy.
With scientists taking the lead in discoveries and practical applications of knowledge, what good are philosophers today? Are they irrlevant reminders of a by-gone day?