Were Adam & Eve The First Ever Humans?

It mentions mankind/ human race, in the first Genesis Chapter 1.
Plus it doesn’t mention Adam and Eve.
It mentions "adam".
Do you really think “mankind” or “human race”, means two people?

Jan.
Genesis clearly says that there were two.

We've been through this many times. You asking the same inane questions over and over isn't going to change what the Bible says. Try something different.
 
It mentions "adam".

Which means “mankind”, “human race”.
“Adam” in the 2nd Chapter means, “man” (singular) “of ruddy complexion”, “ to show blood in the face”.
If you don’t believe me, look it up for yourself (Strongs concordance).

Genesis clearly says that there were two.

No it doesn’t. Not in Chspter 1.
T
See above.

We've been through this many times. You asking the same inane questions over and over isn't going to change what the Bible says. Try something different.

There’s no need.
Just look it up for yourself.
Otherwise I have to reiterate it.

Jan.
 
It mentions "adam".
Which means “mankind”, “human race”.
You don't get to declare what it "means" in one case and what it "means" in the other. It says the same thing in both cases.
Genesis clearly says that there were two.
No it doesn’t.
Yes it does. See above.
Just look it up for yourself.
Otherwise I have to reiterate it.
I have looked it up. Hebrew scholars agree with me. Christian scholars agree with me. Only a tiny minority of pre-Adamites agree with you.

You can reiterate until the cows come home. You're still wrong.
 
You don't get to declare what it "means" in one case and what it "means" in the other. It says the same thing in both cases.

Yes I do.
We have a means of understanding the language which is being interpreted.
You are just going along with an undocumented belief.

Yes it does. See above.

No it doesn’t.
Simply stating it does, doesn’t make it so
See Strongs Co

I have looked it up. Hebrew scholars agree with me. Christian scholars agree with me. Only a tiny minority of pre-Adamites agree with you.

Makes no difference.
You have to look at what the words mean. Then you have to use the words as they are meant.
Christians, Jews, and Muslims, and Atheists, believe that

You can reiterate until the cows come home. You're still wrong.

I will.
And I’m not wrong.
The meanings off the words, in their coroner context, backs me up,
You’re the one who is wrong.

Jan.
 
“Adam” in the 2nd Chapter means, “man” (singular) “of ruddy complexion”, “ to show blood in the face”.
If you don’t believe me, look it up for yourself (Strongs concordance).
Not covered with hair, not a gorilla, in other words. The hairless primate. That is a very distinctive feature of human anatomy - hunters quickly learn to camouflage their faces.
 
Last edited:
Where does it say, in the bible, that the human race was comprised of two people?

Genesis 1: So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.
1 Timothy 2: For Adam was formed first, then Eve
1 Corinthians 15: The first man Adam became a living soul
Why would anyone assume that the human race was, even for a moment, two people.
Once again you are confused between reality and what the Bible says.

In REALITY the human race was never composed of two people.
In THE BIBLE, initally there were only two people - Adam and Eve.
Where does it say in the bible, that the book of Genesis was written by more than one author?
?? It doesn't. The Council of Nicea (and many other religious councils) want you to think that it was written by a single infallible author, to better demand your obedience to it. You have to study it to realize it was written by two authors.
Why assume they are different accounts of the same thing, when there is absolutely no reason to?
Different styles. Different words for God. Different orders of things occurring, such that one contradicts the other.
Wrong again...

Gen 2:20 - And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him.

Gen 2:18 - And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.

Right. God created Eve to help Adam, then told her she'd be having babies.
Sorry mate, it says nothing about having babies. Eve was there to help Adam till the ground.
Genesis 3: "you shall bring forth children." Which makes sense, "because she was the mother of all living." Again, Genesis 3.

Let me know if you don't understand the connection between "bring forth children" and "have babies" or what a mother is.

She wasn’t told to bring forth children.
Genesis 3: "you shall bring forth children."
She certainly wasn’t the biological mother of all the animals brought to Adam to name, before she was created, and she certainly wasn’t the mother of the serpent that deceived and seduced her. So obviously “mother of all living” must have meant something different.
Right. It meant the mother of all living humans.
No it’s not. . . .You know I’m right, because everything I have stated pans out in the bible.
Tell you what. You keep making shit up, and I will keep posting the actual words of the Bible to prove they are lies. And we'll let readers decide.
 
Genesis 1: So God created man in His own image; in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.
1 Corinthians 15: The first man Adam became a living soul
1 Timothy 2: For Adam was formed first, then Eve

It means “mankind”, “human race”.
“Adam” in the 2nd Chapter means, “man” (singular) “of ruddy complexion”, “ to show blood in the face”.
If you don’t believe me, look it up for yourself (Strongs concordance).

Jan
 
Where in the Bible does it say they were married?

Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.

Duh! :rolleyes:

Jan.
 
It means “mankind”, “human race”.
1 Corinthians 15: The first man Adam became a living soul
1 Timothy 2: For Adam was formed first, then Eve
“Adam” in the 2nd Chapter means, “man” (singular) “of ruddy complexion”, “ to show blood in the face”.
If you don’t believe me, look it up for yourself (Strongs concordance).
And "violet" means "purple." Is any woman named Violet therefore purple?
 
1 Corinthians 15: The first man Adam became a living soul
1 Timothy 2: For Adam was formed first, then Eve

“Adam” in the 2nd Chapter means, “man” (singular) “of ruddy complexion”, “ to show blood in the face”.
If you don’t believe me, look it up for yourself (Strongs concordance).

And "violet" means "purple." Is any woman named Violet therefore purple?

Are you saying there aren’t folk who show blood in the face?

Jan
 
Are you saying there aren’t folk who show blood in the face?
There sure are. One here is named Dennis. Another is named Mike.
The only Adam I know here isn't ruddy at all. Pretty pale face actually. HOW CAN THAT BE?

And this is REALLY going to blow your mind! I even know a Violet who isn't purple, and a guy named Red who isn't red.
 
Once again you are confused between reality and what the Bible says.

In REALITY the human race was never composed of two people.

Correct. The human race was created on the sixth day of creation according to the bible.

[quotIn THE BIBLE, initally there were only two people - Adam and Eve.[/QUOTE]

No there wasn’t.

jan said:
Where does it say in the bible, that the book of Genesis was written by more than one author?

?? It doesn't.

So stop saying it does.

Different styles. Different words for God. Different orders of things occurring, such that one contradicts the other.

Nonsense!
You blindly believe the modern institutionalised Christian belief. That belief is based on whatever the defunct Roman Empire wanted it to be.

Right. It meant the mother of all living humans.

Yeah. Eve was the mother of the apple tree she got the forbidden apple from. Wasn’t she? :rolleyes::D

Jan.
 
There sure are. One here is named Dennis. Another is named Mike.
The only Adam I know here isn't ruddy at all. Pretty pale face actually. HOW CAN THAT BE?

And this is REALLY going to blow your mind! I even know a Violet who isn't purple, and a guy named Red who isn't red.

Hey you’re good!

Jan.
 
Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.

Duh! :rolleyes:

Jan.
Just out of curiosity, why do you equal husband with marriage? When in the Bible does it equate husband with marriage?
 
Where does it say in the bible, that the book of Genesis was written by more than one author?
? It doesn't.
So stop saying it does.
I am not saying the Bible says that. I am saying that IN REALITY it was written by more than one author. There is a difference.

You have an almost pathological inability to tell fact from fiction. First you believe that Santa Claus is real, now you have trouble telling the Bible from reality. It's going to be hard for you to make any rational argument with a disability like that.
 
Back
Top