UFOs (UAPs): Explanations?

[river]

New
↑
What else is tangible ?

Something that isn't an observation or experience.

Such as .....

 

[DaveC426913]

No..a ufo account is resolved precisely because there is no other explanation other than that it is a ufo.

Except that
1] "UFO" is not an explanation.
2] It is never "resolved as a UFO", since it is always possible that at any time an explanation might be forthcoming.

What it is, is categorized as unexplained, or more accurately, unidentified - the U in UFO.

 

[river]

Except that
1] "UFO" is not an explanation.
2] It is never "resolved as a UFO", since it is always possible that at any time an explanation might be forthcoming.

What it is, is categorized as unexplained, or more accurately, unidentified - the U in UFO.

The " forth coming " explanation ?

So your hopping that another explaination would explain UFO's ?

 

[river]

Dave , what explanation of UFO's would you like ?

 

[Magical Realist]

1] "UFO" is not an explanation.

Yes it is. We went over this. A ufo is a real object in the world with distinct and typical characteristics and behavior. And there are thousands of accounts of them from all over the world.

2] It is never "resolved as a UFO", since it is always possible that at any time an explanation might be forthcoming.

Yes it is resolved as a ufo since we are talking about ufo accounts. If it was a meteor or the planet Venus it wouldn't be called a ufo account.

What it is, is categorized as unexplained, or more accurately, unidentified - the U in UFO.

No..a ufo is not a variable to be filled by an ifo. It is a flying object of typical size and shape and luminosity that exhibits typical flight characteristics. Hence the study of ufos called ufology.

 

[DaveC426913]

Yes it is. We went over this. A ufo is a real object in the world with distinct and typical characteristics and behavior. And there are thousands of accounts of them from all over the world.

This is entirely false.

Yes it is resolved as a ufo since we are talking about ufo accounts. If it was a meteor or the planet Venus it wouldn't be called a ufo account.

It is categorized as a UFO. UFOs are, by definition, unidentified, and thus have no explanation.

It is a flying object of typical size and shape and luminosity that exhibits typical flight characteristics. Hence the study of ufos called ufology.

This is entirely false.


You are making stuff up.

 

[(Q)]

Refer to section entitled "Physical Evidence"

http://www.ufoevidence.org/

Every time I clicked a link for any physical evidence cases, it kept coming up, 'page has been removed, page not found. etc.'

 

[(Q)]

Such as .....

Are you saying there is no other evidence other than observations and experiences?

 

[river]

Hence the importance of books .

 

[Magical Realist]

Every time I clicked a link for any physical evidence cases, it kept coming up, 'page has been removed, page not found. etc.'

http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc616.htm

http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc490.htm

http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc491.htm

http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc491.htm

http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc487.htm

http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc201.htm

http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc1172.htm

http://www.project1947.com/forum/bctrace1.htm

http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc620.htm

 

[river]

This is entirely false.


It is categorized as a UFO. UFOs are, by definition, unidentified, and thus have no explanation.



This is entirely false.


You are making stuff up.

What " stuff " .

 

[(Q)]

http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc616.htm

http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc490.htm

Sorry, that's not physical evidence, that's just some guy making a statement of claims.

 

[Magical Realist]

It is categorized as a UFO. UFOs are, by definition, unidentified, and thus have no explanation.

The USAF defines a UFO as: Anything that relates to any airborne object which by performance, aerodynamic characteristics, or unusual features does not conform to any presently known aircraft or missile type, or which cannot be identified as a familiar object. (USAF Regulation 200-2)

A 40 ft long tic tac for example..Or a spinning top. Or a metallic disk. Or a black triangle. Or a bright orb..etc.

 

[Magical Realist]

Sorry, that's not physical evidence, that's just some guy making a statement of claims.

That basically describes the entire internet..What did you expect?

 

[(Q)]

Hence the importance of books .

Books that are filled with knowledge from science?

http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc616.htm

http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc490.htm

http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc491.htm

http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc491.htm

http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc487.htm

http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc201.htm

http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc1172.htm

http://www.project1947.com/forum/bctrace1.htm

http://www.ufoevidence.org/documents/doc620.htm

Sorry, couldn't find anything of value there, flattened grass, indented soils and some very old and useless testimony.

 

[(Q)]

That basically describes the entire internet..What did you expect?

I expected to see evidence.

 

[river]

Books that are filled with knowledge from science?


Sorry, couldn't find anything of value there, flattened grass, indented soils and some very old and useless testimony.

Why not ?

 

[Magical Realist]

I expected to see evidence.

You're looking at a computer. It has no ability to output physical evidence.

 

[(Q)]

You're looking at a computer. It has no ability to output physical evidence.

So, if I didn't use a computer, where would I go to see physical evidence? A museum?

 

[(Q)]

Why not ?

Why not, what?