Gawdzilla Sama
Valued Senior Member
You couldn't carry that man's jock strap.A line entirely in keeping with that aloof and disdainful pose avatar.
You couldn't carry that man's jock strap.A line entirely in keeping with that aloof and disdainful pose avatar.
The 2004 Niimtz encounters occurred over an extended period of several weeks, culminating in the now famous chase by Fravor on Nov 14. If it all really was down to jumpy radar operators getting excited over false/misidentified blips, we've all evidently been extremely lucky to have avoided an accidental WWIII till now, and as they say "Gawd elp us awl'.Yeah, reliable radar - the question is how reliable is reliable?
the Probability of Detection is offset by the resulting increase in the Probability of False Alarms. (Link now dead but originally referenced and discussed here) I.e. ALL radars show false signals at times. And also numerically evaluated here.
As for the persistent and repeated trope that "expert" and "trained" pilots (etc) "can't possibly be wrong/ should always be believed" I'll just quote some old posts from (much) earlier threads:
(Here).
(Here).
(Here).
So, looking at the records of Heinkel 113 encounters we can conclude the German production - or rather non-production - records from the Heinkel factories were in fact erroneous and that they did actually produce that aircraft. Equally RLM and Luftwaffe records are mistaken/ lying when they show that no He 113s were taken on strength.It's the long term aggregate that forms imo a reliable overall picture.
Your suggestion then is what? That all those involved navy bods in Nimitz carrier group were so prepped from having watching e.g. X-Files, they just 'saw UFO's' where none existed? And so on similarly for all or most of the huge number of other multiply witnessed incidents over the decades? Stick with that spin if you like. I've given my pov clearly enough. Bye bye for now now.So, looking at the records of Heinkel 113 encounters we can conclude the German production - or rather non-production - records from the Heinkel factories were in fact erroneous and that they did actually produce that aircraft. Equally RLM and Luftwaffe records are mistaken/ lying when they show that no He 113s were taken on strength.
Because, after all, multiple claims over 3 years is a reliable long-term aggregate, neh?
I don't think you have. You asked what kind of evidence for extraterrestrials would be acceptable and I suggested that the same evidence we expect at a crime scene would be acceptable. Where did you address that?I have.
As for the persistent and repeated trope that "expert" and "trained" pilots (etc) "can't possibly be wrong/ should always be believed" I'll just quote some old posts from (much) earlier threads:
You couldn't carry that man's jock strap.
No way!!!No way at all!!!There's just no way they'd mistake jets for 40 ft long tic tacs and "spinning tops" doing hypersonic maneuvers and changes in direction in their protected air space:l
Obviously if you weren't plastering the forum with your fanatical and rather silly prognosis, the rational people here would have no need to correct your nonsensical woo woo claims.You can always tell how compelling your evidence is by the amount of effort skeptics put in to try to refute it.![]()
UFO's are simply UFO's...you don't get to extrapolate that to nonsensical hairy fairy nonsense. Wait!!! yes you do, but rational people will only laugh at such gullibility.Actually I have never watched a single episode of "Ancient Aliens". It's way too New Agey to me and lacks the objectivity of true ufo investigators. UFOs are simply mysterious objects from the Beyond, and not necessarily aliens from other planets in any sense.
It should also be noted that it's something written by a (fiercely) pro-woo person making a claim he doesn't (or can't) justify: .
As I reiterated the other day, woo woo claims, UFO of alien origin claims, and conspiracy nonsense, go hand in glove....one compliments the other which compliments the other, which then leads to pseudoscientific crapAnd I bet that when a scientist (or '"skeptic"') shows the science, it's all "conspiracy", "close-minded", or "they got it all wrong" without any arguments.
Each of those stripes on his sleeve is for four years of service. I only did twenty.Actually I'm quite taken with your avatar...An old sea dog? Navy? ex Navy?
I actually helped to crew a three masted square rigged Barquentine from and through the Panama canal to Sydney over 4 months in 1974. Stops along the way included the Galapagos, Maquesas, Tuamoto Archipelago, Society Islands, Cook Islands, Tonga, Fiji, Lord Howe, and a force 9 gusting to force 10 gale/storm off the East Australian coast. My greatest achievment was becoming proficient at using a sextant. Anyway off topic and yes, great avatar!
Or turn us into a reality show that lasts one season.If Donald Drumpf's comments on a space force...
Well, aliens, maybe, would take notice to humans militarizing space.
You might enjoy the 4th Episode in Season 7 of "South Park" titled "Cancelled". : https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0705900/Or turn us into a reality show that lasts one season.
As I reiterated the other day, woo woo claims, UFO of alien origin claims, and conspiracy nonsense, go hand in glove....one compliments the other which compliments the other, which then leads to pseudoscientific crap