I doubt anyone has been abducted by aliens. There should be DNA of some type one would think, that would be evidence of such an occurrence. Kind of like a person’s fingerprints that are left behind in a crime scene. The fact that there is no evidence that can be monitored and tested could lead one to dismissing that any abductions have happened.
It can mean it didn't happen, or simply that we cannot assume Alien controlled, in whatever manner the pro UFO conspiracy people want to push.
Or much more likely, the pilots had at their disposal advanced avionics etc. perfectly capable of reporting the objects true speed/velocity wrt ground, easily able to account for aircraft speed/velocity. Making your negative commentary a bad guess joke.
And how many of them have been confirmed and validated as Alien controlled and/or directed craft?
Would it make you seem ''mentally ill and paranoid'' just for asking for extraordinary evidence for an extraordinary claim? No one is saying it could not happen.
Thanks MR, I’ll check it out.
And if they claim they saw a magical merry-go-round drop down out of the sky, you believe it. Along with the fairies and the goblins in the closet and the monsters under the bed.
Yes, and then you add your own interpretation, laden with wishful thinking and fantasy.
Pointing out why evidence is unpersuasive is not "being a jerk" or "whining". You should stop whining and realise that.
Not just alleged. Thoroughly studied and documented in the peer-reviewed literature, as well as elsewhere.
No. You're an outlier at one extreme end of the gullibility spectrum - a position you share with Q-reeus.
You assume that "a thing" has been seen over and over thousands of times. The fact of the matter is that we only have thousands of reports of people who claim to have seen a thing that they have interpreted in a particular way - a way that is not at all well evidenced. But you already know this.
Not at all.
Bating much? Reported UAP/UFO activity I have endorsed has had credible evidence backing that position. Which you have invariably cast aspersions on via absurd connections to alleged mundane phenomena or human and/or equipment error, or very often just cheap ridicule. The snaky James R MO.
Conflating there substantive evidence for the non-mundane nature of selected UFO encounters (the focus of my last post), with necessarily speculative ideas about what such UFOs 'really are'. You along with anyone else who has followed this thread know very well what my reasons for believing non-mundane UFOs are paranormal in category. Bizarre behavior and characteristics, to be very brief. Elaborated on in many previous posts YOU HAVE WELL READ AND KNOW. Then again you also are well aware of the mounting recognition in military circles that non-mundane UFO encounters are real and well evidenced over many decades of reliable reports and permanent recordings. Lots of links to that already supplied.
It's baiting q-reeus! that makes 3-3 But enough with the pedant.
Show me any evidence where any official military notice/article, has said they are anything but unexplained UFO's.
Of course that's what the military publicly at least defer to. And you confused things as usual. I wrote the military recognize the reality of the UFO encounters. Quite separate from explaining what such critters 'really are'.
OK, point taken...that being then it is only the uninitiated gullible riff raff that then claim Aliens? Gotcha!!
What would be convincing evidence (to you) in terms of proof of alien spacecrafts? I’m not sure we know what we’re looking for. I mean, what is the reference point?
I'll take a crack at that.
