It was harder, but there are still plenty of ways to mess with photos on film.The best evidence of UFO's is always the older photo's . From the early 60's late 50's . Because none of this photo manipulation was possible , if done extremely difficult and rare .
Redaction? Do you imagine that their is an invisible army of censors out there who are concerned with making sure that certain material about UFOs goes unpublished?Books on the topic , the same . Much , much less redaction .
Scientists are trained to think critically about evidence.Neil is a conservative at heart which most scientists are. No surprise here.
Why should that be? It's worth thinking about, isn't it? What is it about being a UFO nut that tends to damage somebody's reputation?And quite frankly has to be , his job and reputation are on the line .