UFOs (UAPs): Explanations?

That does nothing to support your alien claims.

Now, you have been claiming that you have evidence for alien visitation for several pages of this thread now. Do you have anything of substance to offer? If not, I suggest you leave this thread. We are well aware of your baseless opinions by now. You've got your message across. There's really no need for you to continue to offer up your unsupported views.

I'll leave it to yeah .
 
Blackholes
Only at the Singularity where our models break down. That is no evidence against BH's. Same applies to the BB and why we can only reasonably theorise from t+10-43 seconds.
The maths is not in error with regards to accepted theories.
 
Please support claims like this one with appropriate arguments and evidence. This is troll-like behaviour.
river said:
Blackholes



Only at the Singularity where our models break down. That is no evidence against BH's. Same applies to the BB and why we can only reasonably theorise from t+10-43 seconds.
The maths is not in error with regards to accepted theories.

The maths maybe not , but in regards to real physical objects , blackholes are mathematical fantasy .
 
The maths maybe not , but in regards to real physical objects , blackholes are mathematical fantasy .
Well then all you need to explain is the effects we see that are put down to BH's and of course the photo evidence that was forthcoming last year. But all we are going to get is more unsupported fairy tale rhetoric, without references, links or evidence. :rolleyes:
 
Well then all you need to explain is the effects we see that are put down to BH's and of course the photo evidence that was forthcoming last year. But all we are going to get is more unsupported fairy tale rhetoric, without references, links or evidence. :rolleyes:

Think about the physical things that need to happen for any blackhole to be true .

Gravity draws in matter , yet we know that gravity waves move outward from the source , not inward , towards the centre .

A contradiction .
 
Think about the physical things that need to happen for any blackhole to be true .

Gravity draws in matter , yet we know that gravity waves move outward from the source , not inward , towards the centre .

A contradiction .
Gravitational waves emenate from the source, otherwise you are speaking crap.
Now please, show some evidence that BH's do not exist, not your silly baseless fairy tale nonsense....explain the effects we see. Explain the photo taken last year.
Isn't this the sort of nonsense you were given a holiday for? making unsupported claims?
Please note also they are gravitational waves or radiation, NOT gravity waves!!!!
And they emenate from the source of coalescing BH's/Neutron stars or S/Nova explosions or other catastrophic happening.
 
Gravitational waves emenate from the source, otherwise you are speaking crap.
Now please, show some evidence that BH's do not exist, not your silly baseless fairy tale nonsense....explain the effects we see. Explain the photo taken last year.
Isn't this the sort of nonsense you were given a holiday for? making unsupported claims?
Please note also they are gravitational waves or radiation, NOT gravity waves!!!!
And they emenate from the source of coalescing BH's/Neutron stars or S/Nova explosions or other catastrophic happening.

Gravity ,( gravitational ) waves do emanate from the source . From the frequency that was looked for ,for the evidence of gravity waves .

They are not really gravity waves . These waves are just part of the spectrum of energy and matter .

All forms of energy and matter are present now , and will always
 
Last edited:
Gravity ,( gravitational ) waves do emanate from the source . From the frequency that was looked for ,for the evidence of gravity waves .

They are not really gravity waves . These waves are just part of the spectrum of energy and matter .
What spectrum? what matter? Gravitational radiation are ripples in spacetime, nothing more, nothing less.
All forms of energy and matter are present now , and will always
Matter/particles did not form until 10-35 seconds post BB and the first atomic nuclear at around 3 minutes, while the first elements H and He at around 380,000 years.
The BB was the evolution of space and time [spacetime] as per my many links and references river.
 

Gravity ,( gravitational ) waves do emanate from the source . From the frequency that was looked for ,for the evidence of gravity waves .

They are not really gravity waves . These waves are just part of the spectrum of energy and matter .


What spectrum? what matter? Gravitational radiation are ripples in spacetime, nothing more, nothing less.

The full spectrum in the Universe .

Any matter form

Gravitational Radiation source is ?
 
The full spectrum in the Universe .
Yeah, so? you are spouting scientific meaning nonsense river. What about the spectrum? we see in the visible, gamma and infra red.
Gravitational Radiation source is ?
What I said above in 3590
Gravitational waves emenate from the source, otherwise you are speaking crap.
Now please, show some evidence that BH's do not exist, not your silly baseless fairy tale nonsense....explain the effects we see. Explain the photo taken last year.
Isn't this the sort of nonsense you were given a holiday for? making unsupported claims?
Please note also they are gravitational waves or radiation, NOT gravity waves!!!!
And they emenate from the source of coalescing BH's/Neutron stars or S/Nova explosions or other catastrophic happening.
 
So, in River's world, Black Holes are fantasy and ET is real. Lol.
 
Moderator note: river has been warned for trolling.

river has repeatedly made unsupported claims that various scientific ideas and theories are flawed or incorrect. Each time he has been asked to support his claims with appropriate argument and/or evidence he has either tried to change the subject or has produced useless one-word or one-line fragments, as in this example showing a recent exchange:


Time for you to stop making empty claims and to start presenting your evidence. Please go ahead.
river said:
Not all mathematics describes the Nature of Physics , Natural Physics correctly .
Point to where the maths is in error?
Blackholes

river is currently excluded from posting to any of our Science sections. Now he is bringing his anti-science rhetoric into other subforums and trolling by making empty claims.

Due to accumulated warning points, river will be taking a two week break from sciforums.

This current warning follows a recent break for essentially the same kind of behaviour. If there is no visible change in behaviour upon river's return, it is very likely that river will be permanently banned.
 
Think about the physical things that need to happen for any blackhole to be true .

Gravity draws in matter , yet we know that gravity waves move outward from the source , not inward , towards the centre .

A contradiction .
I wonder if River thinks that boats on lakes can only move in the same direction as the waves...

By Riverian Logic, boats moving in the opposite direction of the waves would be a contradiction...
 
Back
Top