UFOs (UAPs): Explanations?

I assume you have not done any actual research into any of this, as usual. (?)

Uh no..I have not tracked down video versions of these photos in order to discount the lights as film defects. But I'm glad to see someone is on this. lol!
 
Nope....still a big white star and not a red fireball,.
Are you refusing to admit that there is red in the image? Please don't deliberately tell lies, MR. I'd hate to see you receive an official warning just for denying the undeniable and then lying about it.
 
Are you refusing to admit that there is red in the image? Please don't deliberately tell lies, MR. I'd hate to see you receive an official warning just for denying the undeniable and then lying about it.

It is not a red fireball and never will be. The planet Venus presents as a big white star. You can't just make up shit about Venus because you don't want to believe in ufos. Before you were claiming it looked like a disk. Now you're claiming it looks like a red ball of fire. Get a grip man.
 
Last edited:
It is not a red fireball and never will be. The planet Venus presents as a big white star. You can't just make up shit about Venus because you don't want to believe in ufos. Before you were claiming it looked like a disk. Now you're claiming it looks like a red ball of fire. Get a grip man.

I see that MR hasn't the slightest grasp of atmospheric distortion and how it works...

Next, he'll tell us the sun is a bright yellow ball, and that the orange thing over the horizon isn't the sun because, duh, it's the wrong color!
 
Magical Realist:

Take a look at this photo and tell me the colour of the brightest object in it.
mercury-1-31-2017-Yuri-Beletsky-nightscapes-e1485864046952.jpg
 
Magical Realist will argue that red is white in order to defend his belief in little green men.

I rest my case.
 
Magical Realist will argue that red is white in order to defend his belief in little green men.

I rest my case.

Which pretty well shows his incredible affinity for intellectual dishonesty.
 
cluelusshusband,

Are you going to join in with Magical Realist to proclaim that red is white?
 
As I have stated to MR before, I once had a UFO experience....After the sighting, I went home, went to bed, wondering half the night as to what I did see. Woke up the next morning, no radio/TV reports of any other sightings, no Alien takeover of humanity, and I rightly concluded it as a UFO....that is UNIDENTIFIED.
I did not automatically jump to the conclusion it was of Alien origin, although I most certainly believe we are not alone in this universe. But as yet, as of the 11th day of November 2017, we have absolutely no evidence yet of any ETL, let alone any highly imaginative Alien visitations. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence as it is often said. So when we finally find some hard artifact of Alien origin, or some needle that an Alien used for one of those often heard, anal probing medical procedures, when we find some excreta of Alien origin, or a dead Alien, or when they finally after 100 years and thousands of supposed visitations, make themselves officially known, by landing on the lawns of the White House, or London Bridge, or Canberra, then they will forever simply reside in gullible people's imagination.
 
As I have stated to MR before, I once had a UFO experience....After the sighting, I went home, went to bed, wondering half the night as to what I did see. Woke up the next morning, no radio/TV reports of any other sightings, no Alien takeover of humanity, and I rightly concluded it as a UFO....that is UNIDENTIFIED.
I did not automatically jump to the conclusion it was of Alien origin, although I most certainly believe we are not alone in this universe. But as yet, as of the 11th day of November 2017, we have absolutely no evidence yet of any ETL, let alone any highly imaginative Alien visitations. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence as it is often said. So when we finally find some hard artifact of Alien origin, or some needle that an Alien used for one of those often heard, anal probing medical procedures, when we find some excreta of Alien origin, or a dead Alien, or when they finally after 100 years and thousands of supposed visitations, make themselves officially known, by landing on the lawns of the White House, or London Bridge, or Canberra, then they will forever simply reside in gullible people's imagination.
But evidently you do believe in and have actually experienced time travel into the future - and back to the 4th day of November 2017 - when you posted the above!
 
But evidently you do believe in and have actually experienced time travel into the future - and back to the 4th day of November 2017 - when you posted the above!
Hi matey!!! Gee thanks for that pickup re the date...quite informative I must say! But with all due respect, can you comment on the gist of the thread? I mean do you accept the notion that we have been visited by Alien origin UFOs?
Or do you accept the scientific opinion as actually defined by UFO and that we have no real concrete evidence for any visitation, let alone any evidence that any ET exists at all?
Looking forward to an opinion.....
ps: Apologies for keeping you waiting for a reply, but I am also a contributor to another science forum, where I actually over a reasonable short period, have a pretty good approval rating at 99. A lot stricter then here where the usual common GR critic or denier and conspiracy nutters do not last too long.
 
Hi matey!!! Gee thanks for that pickup re the date...quite informative I must say! But with all due respect, can you comment on the gist of the thread? I mean do you accept the notion that we have been visited by Alien origin UFOs?
Or do you accept the scientific opinion as actually defined by UFO and that we have no real concrete evidence for any visitation, let alone any evidence that any ET exists at all?
Looking forward to an opinion.....
My position is well known to you from encounters in numbers of previous threads. Unless you are suffering badly from poor recall. Otherwise, not interested in taking the bait. So sorry to disappoint.
ps: Apologies for keeping you waiting for a reply, but I am also a contributor to another science forum, where I actually over a reasonable short period, have a pretty good approval rating at 99. A lot stricter then here where the usual common GR critic or denier and conspiracy nutters do not last too long.
It took me all of 10 minutes or so to track down where you had found your new home - PhysicsForums. As maroubrabeach:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/hi-members.903742/
An approval rating of 99%? Really? Funny - whenever I occasionally looked in, your last post there was stuck seemingly forever at Feb 24. Oh, just rechecked and it still is!:
https://www.physicsforums.com/members/maroubrabeach.615784/
Hmm...and you joined up there Feb 12 (PF time). An active span of 11 days. I can only speculate that a decidedly unflattering admin PM came your way. But thanks for providing extra personal details there.

Whatever, back here now. With no end of admirers. Such is SF. Anyway, admin will be secretly chuffed at the inevitable boost in site stats. Keep the cut&paste rolling!:)
 
My position is well known to you from encounters in numbers of previous threads. Unless you are suffering badly from poor recall. Otherwise, not interested in taking the bait. So sorry to disappoint.
What bait is that? I don't ever remember you contradicting the nuts that say we have been visited and the memory is still OK for an old bloke you know
It took me all of 10 minutes or so to track down where you had found your new home - PhysicsForums. As maroubrabeach:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/hi-members.903742/
An approval rating of 99%? Really? Funny - whenever I occasionally looked in, your last post there was stuck seemingly forever at Feb 24. Oh, just rechecked and it still is!:
https://www.physicsforums.com/members/maroubrabeach.615784/
Hmm...and you joined up there Feb 12 (PF time). An active span of 11 days. I can only speculate that a decidedly unflattering admin PM came your way. But thanks for providing extra personal details there.
Ummm no sorry, wrong one...I did join that but gave up and it aint the one I am participating in with my 99 approval rating. Nice to see you though interested in my personal details. What was the one you were a member of???I remember you saying in a post but wasn't that interested...Unjustly banned were you not?
Whatever, back here now. With no end of admirers. Such is SF. Anyway, admin will be secretly chuffed at the inevitable boost in site stats. Keep the cut&paste rolling!:)
I will! You take it easy OK?
 
What bait is that? I don't ever remember you contradicting the nuts that say we have been visited and the memory is still OK for an old bloke you know

Ummm no sorry, wrong one...I did join that but gave up and it aint the one I am participating in with my 99 approval rating...
OK so it was a case of try again. Glad you are so very approved over wherever. Top site no doubt!:D
Nice to see you though interested in my personal details. What was the one you were a member of???I remember you saying in a post but wasn't that interested...Unjustly banned were you not?
Yes it was PhysicsForums and yes I was unjustly banned. The so far single such occasion. I have gone over it here at SF before so no rehashing yet again.
I will! You take it easy OK?
Of course to both.
 
Back
Top