There IS No New World Order

Eugene Shubert said:
I prefer to call them the shadow government, which are only slightly exposed in the many documentaries that I've assembled at http://everythingimportant.org.
Click to expand...

The front page of that website lists an extensive theory as to how Satan is going to destroy the Earth. Excerpt:

================
The dragon is Satan. "And the great dragon was thrown down, the serpent of old who is called the devil and Satan, who deceives the whole world; he was thrown down to the earth, and his angels were thrown down with him" (Revelation 12:9).

The reference to the three unclean spirits being like frogs means that these are deceiving spirits. Frogs catch their prey with their tongues. I shall refer to their messages as the first, second and third demon's message, respectively.

Continuing further requires a keen hermeneutic. My system of interpretation is based on two axioms:

1). The dragon, beast and false prophet are the powers that have been most greatly deceived by the three temptations described in Matthew 4:1-11, respectively, and these powers are exquisitely typecast by these temptations.

2). The three angels' messages (Revelation 14:14-20) are an antithesis to the three demons' messages, respectively.
==========================

Is that part of this?
 
billvon said:
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/2116/144/1600/FireSteelBuildingCollapse.View attachment 6834

"About 50 firefighters tackled the blaze at the ESP plant in the Enigma Business Park, near Malvern, which started on Wednesday morning.

The roof collapsed inside the building and flames leapt 45ft (14m) into the sky in a strong wind, Hereford and Worcester Fire and Rescue Service said.

A spokesman for the fire service said the blaze had resulted in a black smoke cloud which could be seen for miles.

He added: "Intense heat buckled the steel girders holding the roof.""
Click to expand...
"Intense heat buckled the steel girders holding the roof." Nothing like that happened on 9/11.
 
Eugene Shubert said:
"Intense heat buckled the steel girders holding the roof." Nothing like that happened on 9/11.
Click to expand...

In that case intense heat bucked the girders holding up the BUILDING. In the case I listed the roof just collapsed. In the case of the WTC the section of the building that was burning collapsed. That, of course, caused the top of the building to fall and start the collapse.
 
Eugene Shubert said:
That's a great picture and a perfect representation of what I'd expect a fire to do to a metal building.
Click to expand...

Weaken the steel and cause it to collapse after the fire burned long enough to heat the steel. And - what do you know? - the WTC's collapsed after the fire burned long enough to weaken the steel.
 
MacGyver1968 said:
So Gene...you've been harping on how Harritt's paper was peer reviewed, and now it exposed that that journal it was published in pretty much publishes anything....what do you have to say to that?
Click to expand...
It's certainly something to investigate. Also, to test Harrit's credibility as an authority in chemistry, all of his 60+ published papers need to be carefully examined. My initial reaction is laughter. It appears that no editor of the journal was fired when the journal published computer generated CRAP but when it came to a political issue that stepped on big toes then real shit hit the fan.
 
Eugene Shubert said:
View attachment 6835 This picture indicates that fire should produce a gradual deformation.
Click to expand...


Hey!! You're finally right about something! The fire caused the floor joists pictured here:

wtcExtColumnsLarge.jpg


to eventually sag and break there connections to the perimeter columns...causing them to buckle and lose structural integrity...which began the collapse.
 
billvon said:
Ah, so Satan is part of the conspiracy too?
Click to expand...
I accept Chomsky's thesis that each of the world's major players are individually following their own self-interest, which has a synergistic effect. I simply allow for a larger explanation if Chomsky's thesis is incomplete.
 
Eugene Shubert said:
I accept Chomsky's thesis that each of the world's major players are individually following their own self-interest, which has a synergistic effect. I simply allow for a larger explanation if Chomsky's thesis is incomplete.
Click to expand...

Once again ignoring the evidence provided to you....damn...you make my job easy.
 
MacGyver1968 said:
to eventually sag and break there connections to the perimeter columns...causing them to buckle and lose structural integrity...which began the collapse.
Click to expand...
Yes, play makebelieve like Read-Only who imagines that he's an expert on everything. The official computer model describing the collapse of WTC 7 is classified because knowing the facts "would jeopardize public safety." Ha Ha!
 
the groundbreaking for both towers were in 68 and 69. Which is irrelevent...you're still ignoring evidence.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top