The unmanned Mars missions were probably faked

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes there is, there are lots of rocks and Mars has rocks ..there is your proof.
Alex
Did anyone else watch the "faked" flawless take off mission to Mars yesterday?? How about all those other "faked" take-off missions to Mars since the 70's. And what about the failed faked missions to Mars by the USSR and Russia...or the faked Mars orbiter mission where they inserted the "faked" wrong figures for a proper "faked" orbital trajectory and sent it flying off into "faked" oblivion.:p:D
Perhaps Freddy is also fake? the only other alternative is.......;)
 
Hey FF you gotta see this.
What do you think?
My guess is the fake Moon landings is a story spread by folk trying to get a jump in the Moon gold rush.
It all fits don't you think?



Alex
 
So you agree with NASA's stand that the Chinese spacewalk was real.
So you went from "the Mars landings were fake" to "the moon mission was faked" to "China's mission was faked."

At this point it would make more sense to ask you what conspiracy theories you do NOT believe. 9/11 truthers? Flat earthers? Lizard extraterrestrials running the government? The Deep State? Are you just all-in on all of them?
 
So you agree with NASA's stand that the Chinese spacewalk was real.
So you went from "the Mars landings were fake" to "the moon mission was faked" to "China's mission was faked."

You're not going to impress the viewers by dodging my questions.


At this point it would make more sense to ask you what conspiracy theories you do NOT believe. 9/11 truthers? Flat earthers? Lizard extraterrestrials running the government? The Deep State? Are you just all-in on all of them?

I think it's pretty clear that 9/11 was an inside job.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...orted-9-11-terrorists.456423/#post-1066183060

There's a dead link in the above post (third from the bottom). Here's a fresh one.

Scientific View - Why you can't believe the truth about 9/11 - Because you're scared of the Truth


There seems to be a shadow government. Do a search on "Bilderberg group".
 
You're not going to impress the viewers by dodging my questions.
And I suppose you believe you are impressing the viewers with your gullible stupidity.
Really it's a wonder people like you are game enough to get out of bed each morning, with all this conspiracy myth.:p
 
You're not going to impress the viewers by dodging my questions.
I don't have a TV show so I have no interest in "impressing the viewers. " Nor do I really care what you think of my replies.
I think it's pretty clear that 9/11 was an inside job.
OK so your list of conspiracy theories so far is:
9/11
Moon landing
Mars probe landings
"Shadow government"

How about:
Flat Earthers
Extraterrestrial lizards running the government
 
How about:
Flat Earthers
Extraterrestrial lizards running the government
I don't believe those two. I think they were created by a public-relations firm to discredit the people who believe in the real theories.

provocateurs,shills and disinfo agents


The people who say they believe them don't really believe them. Only a moron would actually believe them.
 
I don't believe those two. I think they were created by a public-relations firm to discredit the people who believe in the real theories.
WHAT? Mad Mike Hughes was certainly no PR creation! He was as stupid and non-photogenic as they come. And he came THIS CLOSE to proving the Earth was flat with his rocket!
Oh you gullible fool. In the very first video, at 2:20, after the rocket leaves the atmosphere - you can see a piece of tape on a support strut fluttering in the wind! I suppose you think there's wind in space?

Then at the 4 minute mark as the boosters separate you see some flame being blown UPWARDS - as if the booster had just been dropped from an almost stationary platform (like a balloon) and is now falling downwards, not upwards. At the 5 minute mark the Earth looks slightly curved - but when they switch cameras (between 5:20 and 5:45) the Earth suddenly gets a lot MORE curved. They must have used the wrong background!
 
This looks like typical NASA damage-control.
https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/msl/multimedia/pia16052-color.html


NASA has no credibility. They faked the moon missions* and they maintain that the Chinese spacewalk** was real.


*
https://www.giraffeboards.com/showthread.php?t=31034


**
https://forum.cosmoquest.org/showthread.php?169361-The-Chinese-spacewalk-was-faked-in-a-water-tank
So my fat friend, you don't believe that we have the technology to go to the Moon, or send probes and landing craft to Mars, but then in the same breath in another thread for the conspiracy nuts ,you say that the government/s is hiding all sorts of fantastic technological machines and such from us......
YouTube is full of stuff like this. I'm not in a position to be able to verify any of it.

Top 10 Most Famous Magnetic Motors

Why These Engines Are Banned?


free energy generator - outside - filmed in one take


Video response to free energy generator.


My Magnet Motor Free Energy Study

Perpetual motion machines 永久運動機


Fix the World Documentary Part 1


SOLAR DEATH RAY WATER aqua lens with 1/3 Kilowatt Heat Energy grid free energy
So are you really apparently that stupid as reflected in your contradictory posts or simply trolling?
 
So you went from "the Mars landings were fake" to "the moon mission was faked" to "China's mission was faked."

At this point it would make more sense to ask you what conspiracy theories you do NOT believe. 9/11 truthers? Flat earthers? Lizard extraterrestrials running the government? The Deep State? Are you just all-in on all of them?
Qanon? :D
 
https://www.clubconspiracy.com/counter-intellegience-tricks-and-techniques-t4702.html
(excerpts)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Distraction by voluminous postings with no information by blowhards and empty name-callers. (Can be hard to distinguish from genuine blowhards.) People who wallow in the mud do not need to outdebate you; they only need to drag you down there with them. Kill files can help if your newsreader has them.
----------------------------------------------------------------
They may work in teams, supporting each other and giving the illusion of popular support on the net.
----------------------------------------------------------------
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top