the real collusion investigation.

[RainbowSingularity]

anti abortion law ...

?

 

[Write4U]

By issuing a subpoena to Barr to bring the unredacted version of the Mueller report, he is asking the attorney general to break the law.

No he is not. Any security issues of national importance, would not be made public and would be considered in "closed door" session.

And if you dare insert that "there will be leaks", speaks volumes of your attitude toward the vast majority of government professionals and representatives of the people.

Oh Mueller is corrupt. No doubt about that.

That is a flat out cowardly lie. Prove it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

But Bar seems to have integrity

That is a fat out lie, Barr applied for the job with promise he would serve Trump.

and Nadler is setting a trap for him to break his integrity.

No you cannot break the law, when the law demands your due dilligence.

So Mueller and Nadler are corrupt.

That is a flat-out cowardly lie. Prove it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[wegs]

No you cannot break the law, when the law demands your due dilligence.

Hi, can you explain what you mean?

 

[Bowser]

After the end of the Mueller investigation the president ordered an investigation into the origin of collusion against himself.

Now we don't know much about this investigation yet.

Except the evidence that was supposed to be used against the president has backfired.

Why? Because no amount of evidence can replace good character.

Throughout history bad evidence has always been used in collusion with evil and greed to displace good character. The French vs the templars, Jesus vs the Romans, and innumerable haneous unnamed accounts that use imagined evidence or corruption of the ignorant for their own gains of power.

So be careful with the roads that lead to power. They are long, winding, and full of evidence that does not explain its intent.

Not certain where it will lead, but it should prove interesting

 

[sideshowbob]

Sources? In order to judge a mans character you simply take a look at them if you can. In an instant you decide if you like them or not.

But true judges see in that instant what lengths a man would go. And good judges study before making decisions

And it is upon that means alone I have decided the mans "good" character.

There is nothing he would hide from me. His opponents on the other hand have a great many secrets. Including this very pungent reality.

Therefore his greatest strength is also his most vicious weakness. "The inability to lie. " a sign of a "good" character.
Yet you still see "blind faith" and ill tell you this is not true. He would not lie about life or death situations concerning his people. He would not lie about monetary concerns.

And above all he would lie to his enemies through the faces of his friends. Yet he doesn't appear to be making any enemies

I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or if you're just an idiot.

 

[iceaura]

Not certain where it will lead, but it should prove interesting

Repetition will not make that come true.

There is of course no such investigation. There is nothing to investigate, that Trump wants dredged up and back in the news. The Republican media feed will have to invent something, but it will not exist outside that media feed.

The actual origin of the Mueller investigation is well documented public information, and Trump is not going to touch that stuff - he wants all that stuff buried and ignored.

 

[Bowser]

Repetition will not make that come true.

There is of course no such investigation. There is nothing to investigate, that Trump wants dredged up and back in the news. The Republican media feed will have to invent something, but it will not exist outside that media feed.

The actual origin of the Mueller investigation is well documented public information, and Trump is not going to touch that stuff - he wants all that stuff buried and ignored.

Okay.

 

[billvon]

So he talked to some people that run countries and have hate and made them better people in the eyes of others, What a horrible leader.

Yes. When Trump empowers a man who tortures and kills thousands within his country every year, that makes him a horrible leader. We should be supporting Churchills, not Hitlers.

Looks more like he used campaign funds for campaign staff to stay at his place.

You claimed he spent his own money to campaign.

I demonstrated that not only did he get money from donors - he embezzled that money.

Was he supposed to pay for them to stay at the Hilton instead? So instead of being able to use contributions just once.... He retained them. Its a good legal business model.

Ah. So if you send me money for a charity, and I instead buy myself luxury stuff from a company I own, I have done the right thing?

I am starting to see why you support Trump. You sound a lot like him.

Here let me ask you a question. If he gives the donations back to the people that donated would that be illegal?

No, it would not be. Dumb question.

 

[Write4U]

Hi, can you explain what you mean?

Look up due diligence. (I spelled it wrong the first time)

Legal Definition of due diligence

1: such diligence as a reasonable person under the same circumstances would use : use of reasonable but not necessarily exhaustive efforts
— called also reasonable diligence

NOTE: Due diligence is used most often in connection with the performance of a professional or fiduciary duty, or with regard to proceeding with a court action. Due care is used more often in connection with general tort actions.

2a: the care that a prudent person might be expected to exercise in the examination and evaluation of risks affecting a business transaction
b: the process of investigation carried on usually by a disinterested third party (as an accounting or law firm) on behalf of a party contemplating a business transaction (as a corporate acquisition or merger, loan of finances, or especially purchase of securities) for the purpose of providing information with which to evaluate the advantages and risks involved the greatest exposure…for failure to conduct adequate due diligence arises in the context of public offerings of securities— G. M. Lawrence
c: the defense (as to a lawsuit) that due diligence was conducted

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/due diligence#note-1

1. is what Mueller exercised.
c. is Mueller's defense against accusation that his investigation was illegal.

In fact I would argue that Mueller's extreme sensitivity to the ability to issue a warrant to a sitting president is now cause for the defense to claim there is no cause at all, let alone commit an illegal act.

But remember Mueller is a Republican, so there cannot be a claim for an adversary relationship, only due diligence. The rest he left up to Congress in the understanding that his report would reviewed in its entirety. It is Barr who is obstructing justice by making arbitrary judgements of what part of Muellers report Congress shall have access to.

The law reads that Congress "shall" have access to the entire report, but the portions may be subject to "closed door" hearings for national security reasons.

 

[wegs]

Look up due diligence. (I spelled it wrong the first time) https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/due diligence#note-1

c. of course pertains to accusations that Mueller did something unlawful.
In fact I would argue that Mueller's extreme sensitivity to the ability to issue a wrrant to a sitting president is now cause for the defense to claim there is no cause at all, let alone commit an illegal act. Remember Mueller is a Republican, so there cannot be a claim for an adversary relationship, only due diligence.

Oh, I understand due diligence, I was confused in your reply above, but I see you're in defense of Mueller. Okay, thank you.

 

[Tiassa]

If you wish to have an argument its actually philosophy I have studied. Good and evil.

Try working with facts, sometime. Philosophy works a lot better when it does.

Seriously—

Sources? In order to judge a mans character you simply take a look at them if you can. In an instant you decide if you like them or not.

—how does that work?

And why would you evade explaining that?

 

[sculptor]

... Iran... The largest suplier of uranium in the world.

Do you think that Iran is a supplier of uranium?

 

[Beaconator]

Try working with facts, sometime. Philosophy works a lot better when it does.

Seriously—



—how does that work?

And why would you evade explaining that?

Philosophy work better when you understand the alternative is full of hate and misunderstanding. I simply suggest you don't have the means of understanding the battle between good and evil.

Hilary has done nothing to overcome. Philosophy is about overcoming.

To judge someone is unavoidable. Its just too bad most bias is formed at the heart of oneself.

You are an inexperienced freedom maker. Jovial, objective, but inexperienced in that which I consider the true evils of today.

 

[Beaconator]

Do you think that Iran is a supplier of uranium?

Wow ignorant of the uranium deal. Must be blissful. Well I can tell you they don't buy it from other countries.

 

[Beaconator]

Yes. When Trump empowers a man who tortures and kills thousands within his country every year, that makes him a horrible leader. We should be supporting Churchills, not Hitlers.

You claimed he spent his own money to campaign.

I demonstrated that not only did he get money from donors - he embezzled that money.

Ah. So if you send me money for a charity, and I instead buy myself luxury stuff from a company I own, I have done the right thing?

I am starting to see why you support Trump. You sound a lot like him.

No, it would not be. Dumb question.

None of that happens outside the Congo. But you don't care about black people.

You grossly missrepresent the meaning of embezzlement. I would like to have a long discussion about this. It happens between a business owner and a business worker.

Or between the government and an individual.

I can't steal or missapropriate what is mine. Unless I use it for truly nefarious purpose.

Welfare giving money to people who do drugs is more "embezzlement" by standard. Taking tax money from citizens and giving it to gangsters and cartel members by the billions.

 

[billvon]

None of that happens outside the Congo. But you don't care about black people.

Trump (and his ally Kim Jong Un) did all those things. Perhaps you are replying to a different post? Or just throwing "black" out there because you are losing the argument?

You grossly missrepresent the meaning of embezzlement.

Nope. Embezzlement is the misappropriation of funds placed in someone else's trust. For example, people donating to Trump's re-election campaign, believing it would go towards Trump's re-election - and instead being used to pump up Trump property profits.

I can't steal or missapropriate what is mine.

So once again. You give me $100 to help starving kids. I buy an air conditioner with the money because I am hot. You think that's just fine, because once you gave me the money, it was mine?

I am very glad you don't have anything to do with other people's money.

 

[Beaconator]

No he is not. Any security issues of national importance, would not be made public and would be considered in "closed door" session.

And if you dare insert that "there will be leaks", speaks volumes of your attitude toward the vast majority of government professionals and representatives of the people.
That is a flat out cowardly lie. Prove it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That is a fat out lie, Barr applied for the job with promise he would serve Trump. No you cannot break the law, when the law demands your due dilligence.
That is a flat-out cowardly lie. Prove it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

No he is not. Any security issues of national importance, would not be made public and would be considered in "closed door" session.

And if you dare insert that "there will be leaks", speaks volumes of your attitude toward the vast majority of government professionals and representatives of the people.
That is a flat out cowardly lie. Prove it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That is a fat out lie, Barr applied for the job with promise he would serve Trump. No you cannot break the law, when the law demands your due dilligence.
That is a flat-out cowardly lie. Prove it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

To tell you the plans of truly evil men... I would not dare to surmise. Except they prepare for the worst and plan it as well.

To say I recognize truly evil men is an understatement.

 

[Write4U]

To tell you the plans of truly evil men... I would not dare to surmise. Except they prepare for the worst and plan it as well.

To say I recognize truly evil men is an understatement.

I am suggesting that only evil men recognize evil men. Innocents are usually the victims of evil men.

 

[Beaconator]

Trump (and his ally Kim Jong Un) did all those things. Perhaps you are replying to a different post? Or just throwing "black" out there because you are losing the argument?

Nope. Embezzlement is the misappropriation of funds placed in someone else's trust. For example, people donating to Trump's re-election campaign, believing it would go towards Trump's re-election - and instead being used to pump up Trump property profits.

So once again. You give me $100 to help starving kids. I buy an air conditioner with the money because I am hot. You think that's just fine, because once you gave me the money, it was mine?

I am very glad you don't have anything to do with other people's money.

I don't loose arguments. You will apologize eventually or cease to post. I have defiantly been in worse situations. I just believe life is worse in the Congo and Africans can't apply for asylum because border security has been overlooked for so long.

I bought an air conditioner that pays for starving kids. Its a win-win. Not embezzlement. Embezzelment makes angry proprieter. You didn't donate therefore your opinion ceases to matter.

Its not your money its not your business its just something you don't understand that makes you angry.

You can't pay yourself unless you open up an air bnb.

 

[Beaconator]

I am suggesting that only evil men recognize evil men. Innocents are usually the victims of evil men.

Unfortunately you are missing a couple of scenarios. (=

I'm a little bit fearless