It must be so sad that you have to keep up these pretenses, even after rounding losing.
What pretenses? The only pretending occurring during the entire impeachment ordeal was by Bozo and his Republican ass kissers, who had to pretend that facts don’t matter and that he did nothing wrong. You don’t consider it a loss to the country that the current leadership of the Senate and Executive branch are composed of corrupt individuals and a criminal?
And every Democrat was against him even doing that much. Easy to see how much worse off we'd be if any of them were in charge.
When a Democratic president is in a similar position to fail as Trump did, then you can criticize their conduct. Bozo had the chance to get ahead of the game when he took over three years ago, but instead decided to ignore warnings to prepare for the inevitable pandemic and now has to accept the blame he deserves. Stop trying to excuse your president’s actions and start demanding he do his fucking job.
Viruses are commonly named after their place of origin, like MERS (Middle East respiratory syndrome), West Nile virus, Ebola, Zika, etc.. It's an ignorance unique to leftists who think Trump did anything out of the ordinary by referring to it by it's place of origin. It must be so sad to be so ignorant of even the relatively recent past.
Who else of prominence has been calling it the Chinese virus? We all know that the childish person playing US President was going out of his way to take a dig at the Chinese government. And you and your infantile leader need to get up to speed on the current policy for naming diseases.
“ Under agreed guidelines between WHO, the World Organisation for Animal Health and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, we had to find a name that did not refer to a geographical location, an animal, an individual or group of people, and which is also pronounceable and related to the disease,” Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus explains. “Having a name matters to prevent the use of other names that can be inaccurate or stigmatizing. It also gives us a standard format to use for any future coronavirus outbreaks.”
The caution in naming the disease somewhat stems from controversy surrounding past names of new diseases, in particular MERS in 2013. MERS, or Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, was initially labelled 2012-nCoV (2012 novel coronavirus), much like the latest disease was first dubbed 2019-nCoV.
https://newatlas.com/medical/who-names-novel-coronavirus-covid-19/
Even the WHO repeated the Chinese lie that it wasn't human-to-human transmissible and urged against ANY travel restrictions at all.
No, the WHO said this on 1/12/20:
According to the preliminary epidemiological investigation, most cases worked at or were handlers and frequent visitors to the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market. The government reports that there is no clear evidence that the virus passes easily from person to person.
Based on information provided by national authorities, WHO’s recommendations on public health measures and surveillance for novel coronaviruses apply.
https://www.who.int/csr/don/12-january-2020-novel-coronavirus-china/en/
And what has the WHO recommended regarding novel coronavirus transmission since 2012?
What can I do to protect myself?
Exactly how people become infected with this virus is not known at this time. However, some general measures that would be prudent and help prevent the acquisition of any respiratory illness are to avoid close contact, when possible, with anyone who shows symptoms of illness (coughing and sneezing), and to maintain good hand hygiene.
https://www.who.int/csr/disease/coronavirus_infections/faq_dec12/en/
In other words they recommend that the virus should be treated as if it were transmitted person to person.
But if you happen to get your information from an unreliable source, it’s understandable that you would tend to repeat their nonsense.
WHO haunted by January tweet saying China found no human transmission of coronavirus
https://www.foxnews.com/world/world...ry-tweet-china-human-transmission-coronavirus
While the WHO did not recommend travel restrictions back in late January, they did recommend this:
The Committee believes that it is still possible to interrupt virus spread, provided that countries put in place strong measures to detect disease early, isolate and treat cases, trace contacts, and promote social distancing measures commensurate with the risk. It is important to note that as the situation continues to evolve, so will the strategic goals and measures to prevent and reduce spread of the infection. The Committee agreed that the outbreak now meets the criteria for a Public Health Emergency of International Concern and proposed the following advice to be issued as Temporary Recommendations.
https://www.who.int/news-room/detai...the-outbreak-of-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov)
Was there a concerted effort by Bozo and company to detect and trace the virus by way of international travel other that associated with China? Apparently not.
The WHO tests were also less precise.
To identify the virus, the C.D.C. test used three small genetic sequences to match up with portions of a virus’s genome extracted from a swab. A German-developed test that the W.H.O. was distributing to other countries used just two, potentially making it less precise.
But soon after the F.D.A. cleared the C.D.C. to share its test kits with state health department labs, some discovered a problem. The third sequence, or “probe,” gave inconclusive results. While the C.D.C. explored the cause — contamination or a design issue — it told those state labs to stop testing.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/28/us/testing-coronavirus-pandemic.html
You don’t think that other labs developing tests aren’t aware of the lack of precision associated with their tests? If you have many labs making tests, at least some of them will present adequate reliability, which is far better than a single one that doesn’t.
You post excerpts from an article titled,
The Lost Month: How a Failure to Test Blinded the U.S. to Covid-19, and you offer it as an excuse for the Trump administration’s bungled attempt at testing?
How about this nugget from the same article.
But the emergency announcement created a new barrier for hospitals and laboratories that wanted to create their own tests to diagnose the coronavirus. Usually, they faced minimal federal regulation. But once Mr. Azar took action, they were subject to an F.D.A. process called an “emergency use authorization.”
Even though researchers around the country quickly began creating tests that could diagnose Covid-19, many said they were hindered by the F.D.A.’s approval process. The new tests sat unused at labs around the country.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/28/us/testing-coronavirus-pandemic.html
So you can continue to play your sad little game of blame Trump, or you can get over all your petty indignation. Your choice.
Unfortunately Trump is the leader of the federal government tasked with dealing with health threats and emergencies like the one we are currently experiencing, so who else am I supposed to blame when he fails at that task? President Pelosi?
Or the guy he bought the store from?
No bullets or band aids, apparently Trump hasn't mastered the art of stocking shelves. Someone might want to check our military arsenals as well.