Psychometry is a form of extrasensory perception characterized by the claimed ability to make relevant associations from an object of unknow and is okay n history by making physical contact with that object. Supporters assert that an object may have an energy field that transfers knowledge regarding that object's history.
Well, that certainly radiates a great gloriole of science cred around the Proof's head; i.e., is very much in the domain of respectability.
I guess the "2010" date must explain why "structural model of personality" is mentioned in this 2003 paper, but I can't find anything about "13 gods" subsumed in it:
Scientific Proof of God (2003)
Why stop there? Throw in the
13 tribes of Israel (yes -- 13, not 12!) and all the other scattered, triskaidekaphilic correlations and beliefs throughout history. I mean, sometimes "13" seems to border on the popularity of the number "seven" when it comes to mystical associations.
_
[George E Hammond MS physics ('67) Cape Cod MA USA]
... Okay, the dictionary contains "
2 definitions of Psychometry" your definition above refers to a medieval superstition long ago thrown on the ash heap of history. That definition is often confused with the modern definition:
What is psychometric psychology?
... n. the
branch of psychology concerned with the quantification and measurement of mental attributes, behavior, performance, and the like, as well as with the design, analysis, and improvement of the tests, questionnaires, and other instruments used in such measurement.
Also called psychometric psychology; psychometry.
... As you can see the 2 uses of the word "
psychometry" have absolutely no relation to each other!
... Meanwhile, I've done a little searching around on
SciForums to learn where and what you have been posting about. From this I gather that I should consider you more or less like an
average television, female, journalistic reporter type of interviewer! In particular you're obviously not a scientist
per se and your Association with the term "consular diplomacy" tends to confirm that my identifying you as a "
female television news interviewer" is probably closer to the mark!
... In that light, I'm rather glad to see you, since the
discovery of the SPOG (the worlds first
Scientific
Proof
of
God) is certainly a
dramatic news story.
...
Meanwhile my discovery
that the "12 Olympian gods" of psychometry, are actually caused by the "
cubic cleavage of the brain" is actually the
foundational discovery that I made back in 1994, and
I published it in the peer reviewed academic literature.
... It is this peer published result showing that the
axiomatic cubic embryological cleavage of the brain is what causes "
13 personality types" In the
Field of Academic Psychometry.
... In fact, this discovery forms the first level of an
eigenvector pyramid well known to
Academic Psychometry (supported by a massive 50 year worldwide peer reviewed literature) and at the
TOP of this pyramid is a
mysterious and
non-understood single, lone, eigenvector that the psychologists have dubbed the "
GFP" (
General Factor of Psychology).
...
SO, because I have discovered that there are "
axiomatically 13" personality types at the ground level and because they are "
axiomatic physics wise" they must be the "
so-called gods" of antiquity, namely in this case quite obviously the
12 Olympian gods, and that this tells us
immediately that the single lone eigenvector at the top of the pyramid
must be the God of the Bible.
QED: the world's first scientific proof of God has been discovered!
... And to top it all off, the
frosting on the cake, is that I easily show that the 4 x 4 metric (E, N, P, g) is actually a space-time metric which is not diagonal and is therefore what Einstein would call a "
curvature of (subjective) space-time" .
So in the end, it turns out that the world's first scientific proof God is actually explained and founded upon "Einstein's theory of relativity".
Wouldn't you know it?
... Okay
CC, if you as a diplomat and an interviewer and an investigator, can't see
who it is that is talking to you (a physicist) and what he's talking about, and that it actually is "
front page news"
, then you as a diplomat have failed the test ! But I have a suspicion that you may be a different kind of worldly observer, not a scientist, but a suspicious detective, well aware of academic jealousy, religious controversy and general intellectual rowdiness, and may adopt a more
cautious and suspicious attitude about all this !!
