Glass is mass , the equivalent of mass is energy ! How can you say space is not glass if energy can pass right through glass ? For all we know we could be in the middle of flat space sheet of glass. It wouldn't be obviously clear if we was to test for this anomaly , there wouldn't be any difference to spot in reality . How could we test for such an aether that would In a sense have no permeability in regards to photons passing right through it with no opposing forces except our own imaginations less stupidity of own thoughts ? It would be a difficult challenge for sure to gain an answer and adjust the science in consideration of an assumed aether .Glass is matter. Space is not matter. Therefore space is not glass.
That did not seem very hard to disprove.
This is too silly to respond to (much like the OP). My reply was sufficient to disprove the OP.Glass is mass , the equivalent of mass is energy ! How can you say space is not glass if energy can pass right through glass ? For all we know we could be in the middle of flat space sheet of glass. It wouldn't be obviously clear if we was to test for this anomaly , there wouldn't be any difference to spot in reality . How could we test for such an aether that would In a sense have no permeability in regards to photons passing right through it with no opposing forces except our own imaginations less stupidity of own thoughts ? It would be a difficult challenge for sure to gain an answer and adjust the science in consideration of an assumed aether .
Is English your first language ?This is too silly to respond to (much like the OP). My reply was sufficient to disprove the OP.
YesIs English your first language ?
You're wrong.I believe I've changed the way we can consider space !
I disagree. You have put forth an idea that I would expect from a 10 year old.The combination of thought and physical application being applied in a logical manner . You've disproved nothing but yourself and the ability to read fine explanation .
No, that is not a logical conclusion.If I can read my own writing and presentation of science then surely must you be able too also.
That makes no sense. But why start now...Taking science away without thought isn't difficult to finish with a good conclusion that I reached by thought.
Well I suppose sense is a good place to start but sense can be ambiguous in that not all peoples judgement is the same.Yes
You're wrong.
I disagree. You have put forth an idea that I would expect from a 10 year old.
No, that is not a logical conclusion.
That makes no sense. But why start now...
Of course when I say glass , I am using an example comparative . Obviously the standard term and substance of glass , has more density than "glass" .Given that photons as we understand them experience no internal time (owing to the fact that they're moving at lightspeed), they would need to traverse an infinite amount of glass for any given amount of time to pass in our observations. Given that glass has mass, the glass structure the light is traversing would collapse into a black hole long before the light traversed even a relatively small finite distance. (It couldn't traverse any distance, because distance in the universe containing the glass would have ceased to meaningfully exist as soon as the infinite glass came into being.)
Unless you mean matter is something that doesn't behave like the light and photons we are familiar with, and unless you also mean the glass doesn't behave like the glass we are familiar with in the universe we are familiar with, in which case you haven't actually communicated whatever idea you might have, because what you are talking about includes neither photons nor glass, but something you are calling photons and glass in spite of not being the things we call photons and glass.
You seem to know what you are talking about and understand that I am referring to an ether. An ether that is self expanding in the same way as spectral transitions work. We could possibly consider that beyond a form of ether is a lesser energy state than within the ether , significantly the interior of a BH .I think the term you may be looking for is aether, also spelled ether.
And that's more or less how we see space; as a thing, in and of itself, independent of the idea of directions. There is a lot of historical baggage associated with the word "ether", though, so it tends to be avoided.
Now, what's this about matter being light that is passing through it?
Glass has mass. I have money. It is as wrong to say glass "is" mass as it is to say I "am" money.Glass is mass , the equivalent of mass is energy !
What is right and wrong ? Who defines how we ourselves define things ? Things can be explained differently , there is no law that states we have to use strict definition. I think we could manage to reach an understanding if we keep considering space.Glass has mass. I have money. It is as wrong to say glass "is" mass as it is to say I "am" money.
If you want to make yourself understood you have to use definitions that your audience agrees on.... there is no law that states we have to use strict definition.
Well before I go to sleep later I will consider what you are saying about definitions . I just hope you've understood some of it?If you want to make yourself understood you have to use definitions that your audience agrees on.
NooooooooGlass is mass , the equivalent of mass is energy
I am not getting much from this thread, but at least the new definition of Newton's first law was pretty funny.Consider Newtons law of motion , an object will remain in motion unless
1. An external force acts on it
2. There is an obstruction in the way
Don't worry; you have!I sometimes wish I could just forget science and move on.
What you thought is not scienceTaking science away without thought isn't difficult to finish with a good conclusion that I reached by thought.
Newtons law of motion , an object will remain in motion unless
1. An external force acts on it
2. There is an obstruction in the way