exchemist
Valued Senior Member
Misnomer?
Science in " NON-Science " forums .
- Thread starter river
- Start date
- Status
I'll interpret that as I don't take enough drugs.You're not stupid, BwS, you just take too many drugs.
For fucks sake, let's just say the Moon, like most other astronomical bodies, has angular momentum, or turns. That is clear! Any perceived difference is pedantic at best...spins, rotates, turns, the point being made is that our highly psychotically delusional friend river, did not know this.
exchemist
Valued Senior Member
Oh dear. You do worry me at times.
River, you should indeed be in Hollywood...you are an actor.
Let me again be clear...there is nothing inherently wrong with ignorance or a lack of knowledge. There is plenty wrong with fools, clowns and charlatans that are ignorant and lack proper knowledge, to claim they know with certainty, as you do, and the point wegs was making and that has seemingly gone right over your head.
In your case, as having been witness to many of your anti science claims, all with no evidence whatsoever, it certainly appears that you have a serious case of psychotic delusions of grandeur.
You then hide behind this malady and make excuses for it, by falsely claiming that mainstream science and scientists cannot and do not think outside the box. This coming from someone that does not even know what is inside the box!!
Yes, now you know...After being backed into a corner, and having your stupid claims shown as being 100% wrong, you finally decide that to avoid looking like a 150% carat idiot, you had better relinquish your crazy position and then pretend that it exonerates you.
How about your other gross errors of judgement and lack of knowledge that infests this forum over many subjects...you know, things like atomic wars on Mars between Alien species...claims that spacetime is not bent/warped twisted in the presence of mass/energy...claims conflicting with gravitational lensing...and a hundred other crazy notions.Now what? The answer to that is obvious. But because you are essentially an anti science nut, lacking generally the intestinal fortitude to see how logically wrong you are, along with your delusions of grandeur malady, it wont happen.
Oh, and I forgot to mention, this is why you are confined to the fringes, non science sections, and need to practice dishonesty to spread your nonsense.
Bye river, I'll stick to science thank you.
River, you should indeed be in Hollywood...you are an actor.
Let me again be clear...there is nothing inherently wrong with ignorance or a lack of knowledge. There is plenty wrong with fools, clowns and charlatans that are ignorant and lack proper knowledge, to claim they know with certainty, as you do, and the point wegs was making and that has seemingly gone right over your head.
In your case, as having been witness to many of your anti science claims, all with no evidence whatsoever, it certainly appears that you have a serious case of psychotic delusions of grandeur.
You then hide behind this malady and make excuses for it, by falsely claiming that mainstream science and scientists cannot and do not think outside the box. This coming from someone that does not even know what is inside the box!!
Yes, now you know...After being backed into a corner, and having your stupid claims shown as being 100% wrong, you finally decide that to avoid looking like a 150% carat idiot, you had better relinquish your crazy position and then pretend that it exonerates you.
Now what? The answer to that is obvious. But because you are essentially an anti science nut, lacking generally the intestinal fortitude to see how logically wrong you are, along with your delusions of grandeur malady, it wont happen.
Oh, and I forgot to mention, this is why you are confined to the fringes, non science sections, and need to practice dishonesty to spread your nonsense.
Bye river, I'll stick to science thank you.
Oh ...Bye pad . In as many languages possible .
In " pseudoscience forums " page 3 at the very top , thread called " BB is an incomplete theory " . Closed for replies , but gives a clear understanding of my theory .
Read my reasoning of why I think they way I do and those who question my reasoning , and my response to my reasoning being questioned . My proof , of my reasoning .
( This reading of this thread should take a little time for both reading and comprehension )
Then there will be some who won't bother , some who do bother but that disagree with me , and some that bother and think about what I'm thinking ( as few as there probably is ). The last people are the ones I would like also to hear from.
Read my reasoning of why I think they way I do and those who question my reasoning , and my response to my reasoning being questioned . My proof , of my reasoning .
( This reading of this thread should take a little time for both reading and comprehension )
Then there will be some who won't bother , some who do bother but that disagree with me , and some that bother and think about what I'm thinking ( as few as there probably is ). The last people are the ones I would like also to hear from.
Last edited:
- Status