And that's why no rational person think your posts have any merit.Truth Matters .
Integrity Matters .
And that's why no rational person think your posts have any merit.Truth Matters .
Integrity Matters .
That is part of it. The trolling aspect is another part of it. When confronted with facts and/or reality, he resorts to trolling, and also resorting to the well worn old cliche/s that those that agree with mainstream cannot think for themselves, and have their heads in the sand, and that he is the sole person on the forum, with enough foresight to see through the mainstream nonsense.I think the issue river is that we aren’t allowed to post pseudo-science as fact even if the topic is posted in the “non-science” forums. The non-science forums are to discuss pet/personal theories or “junk” science theories that fall outside of the hard science forums. But it’s not a place to post non-science “science,” as fact. I think that could be why your posts are targeted.
I think the issue river is that we aren’t allowed to post pseudo-science as fact even if the topic is posted in the “non-science” forums. The non-science forums are to discuss pet/personal theories or “junk” science theories that fall outside of the hard science forums. But it’s not a place to post non-science “science,” as fact. I think that could be why your posts are targeted.
Liar, liar, pants on fire!!!See your point .
Thanks for the insight .
I never thought of this perspective .
river
you are banned from posting to our Science sections. You cannot get around that ban by posting science threads in non-science sections. You were given many chances to change the way you posted about science before being banned from posting to those sections of our forum, but you never changed. The only solution to stop your nonsense was to prevent you from posting in those sections.
If you continue to post inappropriately, we will have to remove you from the forum altogether.
No I will not .
I will say what I say wether you like what I say or not .
My right to free-dom of speech , anybodies free-dom of speech seems to be threatend here James R.
wegs said: ↑
I think the issue river is that we aren’t allowed to post pseudo-science as fact even if the topic is posted in the “non-science” forums. The non-science forums are to discuss pet/personal theories or “junk” science theories that fall outside of the hard science forums. But it’s not a place to post non-science “science,” as fact. I think that could be why your posts are targeted.
See your point .
Thanks for the insight .
I never thought of this perspective .
river
No worries, river. It takes a village..er forum.![]()
Yes, that's my understanding.I think the issue river is that we aren’t allowed to post pseudo-science as fact even if the topic is posted in the “non-science” forums. The non-science forums are to discuss pet/personal theories or “junk” science theories that fall outside of the hard science forums. But it’s not a place to post non-science “science,” as fact. I think that could be why your posts are targeted.
Yes, that's my understanding.
There is no part of the forum in which one can expect to be immune from criticism. But if one posts nonsense in the science sections, one can expect - in addition to attracting criticism - to run the risk of getting moderated for it and having it removed.
Carte blanche?Criticism ; criticise me all you want exchemist .
river
While I have now decided after much advice to ignore your trolling and pseudoscience nonsense, let me say that I doubt very much that wegs was agreeing with you, rather she being a big softy at heart, was feeling sorry for you, and your psychotic delusions.exchemist , your thoughts .
Curious, that statement is disputed yet also confirmed. Read this;This from someone who did not even recognise that the Moon rotates on its axis.
Misconception (About the Moon)
The Moon does not rotate.
https://moon.nasa.gov/about/misconceptions/Reality
The Moon does spin on its axis, completing a rotation once every 27.3 days; the confusion is caused because it also takes the same period to orbit the Earth, so that it keeps the same side facing us.
Rotate is a verb. Spin is both a verb and a noun. Revolution is a noun, the associated verb being "revolve".Curious, that statement is disputed yet also confirmed. Read this; https://moon.nasa.gov/about/misconceptions/
I'm not sure if I can visualize a distinction between "rotate", "spin", and "revolution". What's the difference?
You're not stupid, BwS, you just take too many drugs.Carte blanche?
Me, I'm too stupid I'd make his brain explode.
Thanks for clarifying. But I was not adressing Paddo's post per se.There is nothing curious about the statement you quote. "The moon does not rotate" is stated to be a misconception.
Which both agrees and disagrees with the curiously worded explanation in the following NASA quote. This appears to present a conflicting statement.paddoboy said: ↑ This from someone who did not even recognise that the Moon rotates on its axis.
The curious part is that it leaves the reader with the question "does the moon rotate or not"?Misconception (About the Moon)
The Moon does not rotate.
Reality
The Moon does spin on its axis, completing a rotation once every 27.3 days; the confusion is caused because it also takes the same period to orbit the Earth, so that it keeps the same side facing us.
Not in the least. It's perfectly clear.Thanks for clarifying. But I was not adressing Paddo's post per se. Which both agrees and disagrees with the curiously worded explanation in the following NASA quote. This appears to present a conflicting statement.
The curious part is that it leaves the reader with the question "does the moon rotate or not"?
Not to me.Not in the least. It's perfectly clear.