5-6 ,months allowing for the difficuty in finding and surveying...there are literally thousands involved. [since 2003]When do you expect these stats to come back then?
5-6 ,months allowing for the difficuty in finding and surveying...there are literally thousands involved. [since 2003]When do you expect these stats to come back then?
This seems so utterly preposterous I'd like to see if I am reading this right: You are saying that AN's rude posts on a forum are causing the targets of said posts to have a spontaneous pneumothorax?
I might add , every thread and every post that you have used the accusation of dishonesty across the net has been retreived and archived. Every person you have attacked in this manner is being tracked down and surveyed especially for lung and respiratory disorders eg. [spontaneous Pneumothorax], including the lethal tension version. When the stats come back the evidence of what and who you really are is going to make headlines.
I do not need to, let the stats speak for themselves.
"you see the method AN uses is almost identical to that which my own father used when I was a teenager... some 35 years ago... it resulted in 5 pnemothoraxes including the resection of my left lung by approx 1/3"
and like my father AN probably can't control himself and tries to restrict his compulsion by using an internet forum like this one."
Just who do you think AN is?
I'd be most grateful if you could go into a few details of this method you say AN uses. It sounds interesting.
post away Emil your thoughts are always welcome...I tried to see the forum rules.
I failed. We no longer have rules?
I wanted to make sure, if allowed to comment on the person who posts ?
I appreciate your politeness.post away Emil your thoughts are always welcome...
I tried to see the forum rules.
I failed. We no longer have rules?
I wanted to make sure, if allowed to comment on the person who posts ?
Rules here. You can access them at the top of every forum.
Netiquette:
Do not insult or harass other members.
Do not engage in ad hominem attacks (i.e. attack the argument, not the person).
Behaviour that may get you banned:
Personal attacks on another member, including name-calling.
H. Netiquette
Civility
1. Members should abide by basic standards of good manners and courtesy when addressing other members. If another member insults you, do not return fire; report the offending post.
Referring to other members
5. Comments about other forum members that are derogatory, overtly sexual or which constitute harassment are unacceptable.
Replying to posts
10. Attack the argument, not the person. Avoid phrases such as ‘Only an idiot would say that’, which is equivalent to the personal insult ‘You are an idiot’. If you disagree with a position, explain why clearly and politely, and don’t forget to provide suitable evidence in support of your own position.
I. Unacceptable behaviour that may result in a temporary or permanent ban
Personal attacks, threats and stalking
2. A personal attack on another member usually involves the word ‘you’, express or implied by context, combined with a negative comment. Attacks on another member (known as ad hominem attacks), as opposed to criticisms of his or her arguments, are not tolerated. Childish name-calling, such as referring to a member as a ‘moron’, ‘twit’, or ‘idiot’, is one obvious example of a personal attack.