The purpose of anything can be determined by the qualities it possesses.
How very Platonic....
And thus.. right into the old ontology of qualia problem...
Similarly, taking the tact that it is irrational to assign purpose to the universe based on human experience says nothing about the purpose of an entity who's jurisdiction of prowess involves the creation,maintenance and annhilation of the universe.
Correct.
Yet interestingly, moot. We have no reason whatsoever to support the notion of such an entity.
even in terms of mundane thinking, human purpose is frequently turned on its head. Such is the nature of being forced to operate in a system that places obstacles in implementing one's will.
I fully agree.
But to thereby propose that those obstacles are in some way an antagonist is, again, unreasonable.
LG,
You seem insistent that 'value' (even in your odd definition) is a pervasive element of experience. I'm fine with that, and do not disagree with that. Unlike you however, I cannot support the notion that it is a necessary element of experience. Regardless of this question of scope and efficacy, what I cannot agree with you on, in any way whatsoever, is your insistence that it is somehow reasonable to claim anything whatsoever
beyond our particular realm of experience. All "value", or "purpose" I have ever known, is nothing but that invoked by a human mind.
It is this that ultimately causes the two of us to constantly find tension, regardless of the topic. Feel free to say that this is due to some 'value' of mine, call it reason, or logic,or what you will. In any case, all I can say is that there is no 'value' that I hold to, that could possibly cause me to see the utility in anything that is necessarily defined as being outside the scope of human experience. To me, that would be the height of folly.