It's good , and I mean real good to talk to someone who has some sence. I like you duendy, i think i've said that enough before.
Then, duendy tell me what is there? There isn't a such thing as mental illness? Are you taking away the classification---to purpose---that the person actually isn't at fault---that the person has no "mental illness" ---no fault i'm sure? That, really and truely, I haven't got a mental illness, especially if it is proven to be a chemical im-balance? What about the others (ie, meta, ph): who have similar "problems"? What then do you call the mental health professionals, who work at "mental health institutions and such"? I have been to one before, they have tried to help me and I am very th ankful for their HELP, with my PROBLEM.
me)))))so-called 'chemical imbalance' whatever THAT is, is not a disease. it is a scam-label which says noting, and is where the quacks come outta the woodwork to give you 'correct chemical balance' wit thier pills.....say you were down. for various reasons, and they assume your chemical level is 'not right'---this is subjective. it mas noting. it is not like diagnosing a real physical disease.
So whatis the role of mental healt professional. well thers a place fpr experienced people to speak with in confidence of course, but when it becomes bio-psychiatry/psychologgy is when it becomes manpulative and ugly
of course youu and others MA feel helped by the 'meds'. i have spoken to two pople, one whoe praised ECT, which she had had....! and another paised haaven been sectioned. what do i do, arguethem wrong. IFthey say that they believes it. but i am trying to challenge the underlying myth about this. .....Look, not long ago, this same 'professional institution' was diagnosing homosexuals as mentally ill, right, and doing all kinds of harmful shit to them, npw some admit that all of that as wrong... hint hint?
I will agree with you that it is their behaviour. But that's it duendy. The people we are supposively talking to or about, actually, have problems. It is their behaviour, and if or not you call it "not mental disease", when actually, it is their sickness. It is again their problem --- their mental issues and lack of responsibility. I would say, at least...... duendy
me))))))it is not sickness, it isbehaviour. if you call it sicness you may as well call it disease. it is manfestations of distress, of self healing of organism which is not understoo by this materialistic culture. you HAVE to begin sussin out the philosophy of tis culure to also understand bout this exsta. to this culure we are mere biochemical machines wit no MEANING
indeed this may be one sided. If you tell the person he has a mental illness and to fight it, that is the best you can do. I agree with this statement i made, although it seems wrong. How?: Telling the person they have a problem is the same thing. Mentally ill is the same thing. They are mentally ill, if we call it, are they not? ..... I disagree with these points as far as I can see.....
me))))))i can feel you confusion. let me repaet. i am NOTsaayig someone who feels distress is not feeling distress. they may be very vulnerabe, even having visions etc. yes. but this is NOT disease un :ESS it is an organic disease of brain etc. if not thatit aint disease. it is a natrual pocess. we are all of us oppressed by system and ideology with its pressures etc. the whole is health. not saying someone is 'sick'. you with me?
sayt a kid is hating school...cant fit in, is eating crap food given to im at home, isfeeling lost and bullied, and bored wit shitty school. hence he may be hypewractive, or tired all the time/deressed, etc etc. so what is happening now. well tat kid is being diagnosed wit a mental illness is what. millions of them are......hiny hint?....see how tis scam operates
And here is where you apparently must have pity....
