All or any of which arguments, Jan?
The ones laid out by Bill Craig.
No, I'm not going to do your homework for you. You say that all or any are good, so set one out.
Do your own home work mate.
I’ve set all of them as decent evidence, so take you pick.
I've seen no evidence from you, read no argument from you, just the claim that you support the arguments of William Craig.
Then go, look, see.
What arguments are those, Jan?
The ones laid out by Bill Craig.
What is the evidence that he puts forth that you agree with?
All of them.
There is everything to discuss: namely why some people accept the example as evidence and why some people don't.
So tell us why you don’t.
I assume you don’t.
If you have no intention then wtf are you doing in this thread,
No intention of what?
Discussing why I think that Bill Craig’s arguments provide evidence that God is real?
I’m more interested in hearing what you have to say about it, and God in general. There’s no requests for theists to specifically discuss why they think God is real, while the atheists just sit back and reject and deny.
Plus that has been the formula her for years and years. Obviously you’re not getting any closer to comprehension.
I say let’s come away from that lame structure, and look at the subject a different way.
Is that so bad?
Perhaps matters of "why?" or "why not?" Jan.
Boring!
It doesn’t work. It never had done, and it never will as long as we stick to this anal format.
I understand it is in your favour to keep this up, but we both know it leads nowhere.
However, what can be discussed or not is rather moot if nothing is put forth as the subject of discussion, if no examples are put forth.
WLC’s evidence for God has been put forward. Either look it up, or use Yazatas post.
I'm sure the boy thought so, too, as he left smiling with the turd on the floor.
Do you smile when you leave your turd on the floor? I ask because although it is entirely unrelated to anything in this thread, it seems a strange example to use.
William Craig, nor his arguments, are the boy, Jan. You are.
I think the whole scene is you.
Hope you’re better now. It’s one thing to keep poohing on the floor when you’re a boy, but it can be quite worthy of serious attention now you’re a man.
Pooh!
That you keep leaving on the floor.
"Supposed to do"? Wow, so you really do see people as there to do all your homework for you?
Do your own homework, I’ve already done mine.
This is a discussion forum, Jan. Try actually discussing sometime.
Will do as soon as someone wants to actually discuss. Unfortunately this thread seems to be populated with the usual defensive atheists, who do not know, or more importantly, want to know squat about God, or theism, only defending their worldview.
No, Jan. That's not how it works. You post what you consider to be evidence.
I have done, via a source Bill Craig.
I’m not going to start writing it out, and am waiting to see if there are any discussions worth having.
If he is your source, then be all means indicate that once you have detailed what you consider to be the evidence, but post what you think to be evidence.
Why? Just read anything he regards as evidence, then post or not, why you think it isn’t. If there is a discussion within what you say , we’ll discuss. If not, we won’t.
What do you consider to be evidence for God, Jan? Please detail a specific argument (or more than one) that you feel provides evidence.
I have to assume you’re not stupid, Sarkus.
I have given my consideration. So deal with it, or not. It’s now you’r call.
If you have no intention then please stop trolling the thread, please clean up your faeces, and leave.
Read above.
Jan.